[mif] RFC 6731 on Improved Recursive DNS Server Selection for Multi-Interfaced Nodes[mif] RFC 6731 on Improved Recursive DNS Server Selection for Multi-Interfaced Nodes
rfc-editor
2012-12-19
mif
/arch/msg/mif/wD3nj0_u4xqrgyQbEhvnuvhFlOM/
926433
1484850
[mif] (no subject)[mif] (no subject)
Daniel Park
2012-11-17
mif
/arch/msg/mif/u9P2-jjbG4L5tGQCFv7aGGUnvwI/
926432
1484851
Re: [mif] #25: Should document that it updates RFC 6434 (node requirements)Re: [mif] #25: Should document that it updates RFC 6434 (node requirements)
Brian E Carpenter
2012-11-16
mif
/arch/msg/mif/NrbyLkCPwMaPlyoKu4OYiau-UJc/
926431
1484852
[mif] #25: Should document that it updates RFC 6434 (node requirements)[mif] #25: Should document that it updates RFC 6434 (node requirements)
mif issue tracker
2012-11-15
mif
/arch/msg/mif/sSvhxkgb4oh_N7ZL-Racn1R2bNQ/
926430
1484852
[mif] #24: Officially document that this updates RFC 4862[mif] #24: Officially document that this updates RFC 4862
mif issue tracker
2012-11-15
mif
/arch/msg/mif/uI2IuPbRu4wfSp32KvIbjqE_GHA/
926429
1484853
Re: [mif] IETF 85th MIF MinutesRe: [mif] IETF 85th MIF Minutes
Hui Deng
2012-11-14
mif
/arch/msg/mif/-uEWWGAdI-Zfa8q2rPemG_lQDzE/
926428
1484854
Re: [mif] IETF 85th MIF MinutesRe: [mif] IETF 85th MIF Minutes
Alexandru Petrescu
2012-11-14
mif
/arch/msg/mif/shuKwx89NAxwxLdNFUw9nTg9kZU/
926427
1484854
Re: [mif] IETF 85th MIF MinutesRe: [mif] IETF 85th MIF Minutes
Konstantinos Pentikousis
2012-11-14
mif
/arch/msg/mif/kWg8Nz9bOkGO7pC6ghmE-OuNRJ4/
926426
1484854
[mif] IETF 85th MIF Minutes[mif] IETF 85th MIF Minutes
Hui Deng
2012-11-13
mif
/arch/msg/mif/bkNTg5kOXqvu7TDFCRcu80pD6DU/
926425
1484854
Re: [mif] some questions about dns-server-selectionRe: [mif] some questions about dns-server-selection
Michael Richardson
2012-11-12
mif
/arch/msg/mif/6TeiYbrjmzV5ujshBjx-AET35tk/
926424
1484855
Re: [mif] some questions about dns-server-selectionRe: [mif] some questions about dns-server-selection
teemu.savolainen
2012-11-12
mif
/arch/msg/mif/6zenHZ4etWyw2HKNgcY5oZauhcg/
926423
1484855
Re: [mif] Issue #16: Re: draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option in mif WG charterRe: [mif] Issue #16: Re: draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option in mif WG charter
Ted Lemon
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/xRtxdnOuebjo4x9gKpRDg6FalLE/
926422
1484873
[mif] some questions about dns-server-selection[mif] some questions about dns-server-selection
Michael Richardson
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/3glKkhd2GizGTTAYTvyALc1EIbo/
926421
1484855
Re: [mif] Issue #16: Re: draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option in mif WG charterRe: [mif] Issue #16: Re: draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option in mif WG charter
Margaret Wasserman
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/pGZZQcmgDXPSrK6EnzMj8Iadbbw/
926420
1484873
[mif] #23: Prefer 'preference' over 'metric'[mif] #23: Prefer 'preference' over 'metric'
mif issue tracker
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/uzgdgdUsev4SboCbnuhqXrhPlJE/
926419
1484856
[mif] #22: Some use cases assume IP multicast is not part of the Internet architecture[mif] #22: Some use cases assume IP multicast is not part of the Internet architecture
mif issue tracker
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/4Eq9Pv5gIF0zwQdBdo8agrocofs/
926418
1484857
[mif] #21: Some use cases assume IP multicast is not part of the Internet architecture[mif] #21: Some use cases assume IP multicast is not part of the Internet architecture
mif issue tracker
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/JG_fXK_eeLtjpmhRRODK_o-x3LU/
926417
1484858
Re: [mif] Issue #16: Re: draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option in mif WG charterRe: [mif] Issue #16: Re: draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option in mif WG charter
Andrew Sullivan
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/QOd7z_EGYuFHX5X5bKr4wz41M_E/
926416
1484873
[mif] #20: Use case #9 suggests changes to IPv6 deployment architecture[mif] #20: Use case #9 suggests changes to IPv6 deployment architecture
mif issue tracker
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/Jfd80P4LcbtU_d4kzHw6kqJ6wWQ/
926415
1484859
[mif] #19: Last paragraph of 7.1 needs clarification[mif] #19: Last paragraph of 7.1 needs clarification
mif issue tracker
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/czQl6hihgrdQSg2A9Dy878qSHVw/
926414
1484860
Re: [mif] Issue #18: Vague problem statement...Re: [mif] Issue #18: Vague problem statement...
Lorenzo Colitti
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/W7ceG36maKIuvL44rF8ZWQ-_ro8/
926413
1484872
Re: [mif] Issues #10, #11 & #12: "Walled-garden" use cases are invalidRe: [mif] Issues #10, #11 & #12: "Walled-garden" use cases are invalid
Lorenzo Colitti
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/UAfP5PAvW6qrZOOks7v-5gZKAhA/
926412
1484868
[mif] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mif-api-extension-03.txt[mif] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mif-api-extension-03.txt
internet-drafts
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/0QmzklC4maRPwVkghG6kSWYAFpU/
926411
1484861
[mif] Issue #7: Separate specific routes from default routes?[mif] Issue #7: Separate specific routes from default routes?
Margaret Wasserman
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/9EbrZlSeQjdxqIfP4pK7Yuxwvw8/
926410
1484862
[mif] Issue #8: Absent MAC Address of Default Route[mif] Issue #8: Absent MAC Address of Default Route
Margaret Wasserman
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/-SKlbAkUxP_HNBLCt8304B8svMs/
926409
1484863
[mif] Issue #6: Lifetime field length should be 16 bits for ND compatibility[mif] Issue #6: Lifetime field length should be 16 bits for ND compatibility
Margaret Wasserman
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/QWZQZBr00drIMh-ZGL09uQatnNY/
926408
1484864
[mif] Issue #5: Only one default route?[mif] Issue #5: Only one default route?
Margaret Wasserman
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/6JgcFnVQATPC1S7aEOmZQQDBNJs/
926407
1484865
[mif] Issue #13: Use case #10 is self-referential[mif] Issue #13: Use case #10 is self-referential
Margaret Wasserman
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/zcwaSDOTSqfbcpsS-kPL8JTR83Y/
926406
1484866
[mif] Issue #14: Use case #6 is insufficient[mif] Issue #14: Use case #6 is insufficient
Margaret Wasserman
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/Uk4_VYEXjMxUuhED9cEy-db3_6k/
926405
1484867
[mif] Issues #10, #11 & #12: "Walled-garden" use cases are invalid[mif] Issues #10, #11 & #12: "Walled-garden" use cases are invalid
Margaret Wasserman
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/_9GJ3MmdVN_A_Hn9oFQ4rGORngE/
926404
1484868
[mif] Issue #9: Violates RFC 5505 section 3.2.1 (fate sharing)[mif] Issue #9: Violates RFC 5505 section 3.2.1 (fate sharing)
Margaret Wasserman
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/FIv97Ad9tNApG1fTXArnsVdIapE/
926403
1484869
[mif] Issue #17: Status of DHCP Route Option should be clarified[mif] Issue #17: Status of DHCP Route Option should be clarified
Margaret Wasserman
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/XqblFNUabTaJGYRerr86-UpIzlA/
926402
1484870
[mif] Issue #15: Use case #1 does not justify standardization...[mif] Issue #15: Use case #1 does not justify standardization...
Margaret Wasserman
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/6DPpto1Cc9ekikz0zKBa1ifj74o/
926401
1484871
[mif] Issue #18: Vague problem statement...[mif] Issue #18: Vague problem statement...
Margaret Wasserman
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/7dBwf3NJuGOKO9pNksDXUfs6H60/
926400
1484872
[mif] Issue #16: Re: draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option in mif WG charter[mif] Issue #16: Re: draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option in mif WG charter
Margaret Wasserman
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/Vt3ZYY4YAVB10tc4C4U_xUrXuBg/
926399
1484873
[mif] draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option in mif WG charter[mif] draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option in mif WG charter
Ralph Droms
2012-11-09
mif
/arch/msg/mif/ac3aFje90QtmKVXCBIocFWapNSw/
926398
1484873
Re: [mif] #15: use case #1 does not justify standardization of this optionRe: [mif] #15: use case #1 does not justify standardization of this option
Arifumi Matsumoto
2012-11-06
mif
/arch/msg/mif/rNxBHH057X-oMHYOQXsnP9_u5Ck/
926397
1484882
Re: [mif] #15: use case #1 does not justify standardization of this optionRe: [mif] #15: use case #1 does not justify standardization of this option
Lorenzo Colitti
2012-11-06
mif
/arch/msg/mif/K8vDJCsF01gC6J7GHvLVjfV8XYU/
926396
1484882
Re: [mif] #15: use case #1 does not justify standardization of this optionRe: [mif] #15: use case #1 does not justify standardization of this option
Ted Lemon
2012-11-06
mif
/arch/msg/mif/1uJCA9MLf6ZG2mmERwbmjCwafkU/
926395
1484882
Re: [mif] #15: use case #1 does not justify standardization of this optionRe: [mif] #15: use case #1 does not justify standardization of this option
Lorenzo Colitti
2012-11-06
mif
/arch/msg/mif/4r3mOjydecvtAFgJi09I--G4j94/
926394
1484882