Subject
From
Date
List
[Netconf] IETF 101 SN Question 3: DSCP as its own feature?[Netconf] IETF 101 SN Question 3: DSCP as its own feature?
Eric Voit (evoit)
2018-04-03
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/MJTM1AaG6ithLzvQ_Ozj46J9fPY/
2566943
1779067
Re: [Netconf] IETF 101 SN Question 3: DSCP as its own feature?Re: [Netconf] IETF 101 SN Question 3: DSCP as its own feature?
Joel M. Halpern
2018-04-03
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/lBQgfZuEambArOLDPPQz4o3LDF0/
2566946
1779067
Re: [Netconf] IETF 101 SN Question 3: DSCP as its own feature?Re: [Netconf] IETF 101 SN Question 3: DSCP as its own feature?
Eric Voit (evoit)
2018-04-03
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/Kwj1Dtz47YVl0Si35-KGoHzzdD8/
2567059
1779067
Re: [Netconf] IETF 101 SN Question 3: DSCP as its own feature?Re: [Netconf] IETF 101 SN Question 3: DSCP as its own feature?
Joel Halpern Direct
2018-04-03
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/tX2Z6whq6iOSSv81b8oTfDiEFTo/
2567069
1779067
Re: [Netconf] IETF 101 SN Question 3: DSCP as its own feature?Re: [Netconf] IETF 101 SN Question 3: DSCP as its own feature?
Alexander Clemm
2018-04-10
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/7E6bq8txI12OP37wW3-AGwljZfY/
2570460
1779067
Re: [Netconf] IETF 101 SN Question 3: DSCP as its own feature?Re: [Netconf] IETF 101 SN Question 3: DSCP as its own feature?
Eric Voit (evoit)
2018-04-16
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/j3Gs9K3r87soGLL9a3vGnNh5P8o/
2572755
1779067
[Netconf] Impacts of bcp56bis on RESTCONF?[Netconf] Impacts of bcp56bis on RESTCONF?
otilibil
2018-04-03
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/neQ4NggCyirOyKF3tvE2IVk6grg/
2566594
1778931
[Netconf] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis[Netconf] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis
Mahesh Jethanandani
2018-04-02
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/CrbPBC-4U542fkKz1R4AHAaclV8/
2566096
1778695
Re: [Netconf] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bisRe: [Netconf] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis
Martin Bjorklund
2018-04-06
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/FA4uE7fJTthPBB-Zk33fR2j0uuo/
2568789
1778695
Re: [Netconf] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bisRe: [Netconf] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis
Mahesh Jethanandani
2018-04-06
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/vyWTRGQsQL11534njNLcPd9QQCI/
2568903
1778695
Re: [Netconf] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bisRe: [Netconf] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis
Martin Bjorklund
2018-04-09
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/FAio-w_WWat8d0cHqWU6_4aYf_Q/
2569463
1778695
[Netconf] yang push: push-change-update for leaf-lists[Netconf] yang push: push-change-update for leaf-lists
Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
2018-03-29
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/1_dhXyJS7T5LbUBQRkJste4S4aU/
2565165
1778305
Re: [Netconf] yang push: push-change-update for leaf-listsRe: [Netconf] yang push: push-change-update for leaf-lists
Eric Voit (evoit)
2018-03-30
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/kh8ktJBvWY9iYDVCqeZsO0Ej18M/
2565750
1778305
Re: [Netconf] yang push: push-change-update for leaf-listsRe: [Netconf] yang push: push-change-update for leaf-lists
Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
2018-04-03
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/GtXhmFbNp7uVH4JPzE69EhlxmYo/
2566628
1778305
[Netconf] Draft minutes[Netconf] Draft minutes
Mahesh Jethanandani
2018-03-29
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/znGY1n6BiZOsv4k2RrbEeTkfjBY/
2565144
1778300
[Netconf] [Errata Rejected] RFC6242 (5305)[Netconf] [Errata Rejected] RFC6242 (5305)
RFC Errata System
2018-03-27
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/TyV3XFHahXlhDj1SEeofCinYnHA/
2564206
1777997
[Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6242 (5305)[Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6242 (5305)
RFC Errata System
2018-03-26
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/tDYeAxJFRW2mwsT3wFlNdoLmnko/
2563407
1777780
Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6242 (5305)Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6242 (5305)
Ignas Bagdonas
2018-03-26
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/TtU8mnsnTKXw_ciFOcJh0FVKBRw/
2563661
1777780
Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6242 (5305)Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6242 (5305)
Mahesh Jethanandani
2018-03-26
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/akA6dxoCst4RDRwIabWdXxG0pgY/
2563673
1777780
Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6242 (5305)Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6242 (5305)
Robert Wilton
2018-03-26
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/rIcipz9X7fV5VUWpYfa1K3xPac8/
2563676
1777780
Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6242 (5305)Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6242 (5305)
Kent Watsen
2018-03-26
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/KKMzdMkb6v7dPMbkMoQ8yv42zcA/
2563848
1777780
Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6242 (5305)Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6242 (5305)
Robert Wilton
2018-03-27
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/KJUza25d2xPep7RWPjcc_czo1Ss/
2564012
1777780
Re: [Netconf] 回复： [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6242 (5305)Re: [Netconf] 回复： [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6242 (5305)
Ignas Bagdonas
2018-03-27
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/xMBJjW9Sn5xzXZYhwVbRM0Im1fg/
2564186
1777780
Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6242 (5305)Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6242 (5305)
Margaret Cullen
2018-03-27
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/UEeIThtUWtiOnXAdMng4jVZ9qVw/
2563882
1777780
[Netconf] How to grep through a YANG? With grepyang[Netconf] How to grep through a YANG? With grepyang
otilibil
2018-03-24
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/BotUwSWSF1sV0edTqSUQ2PrSUZc/
2563179
1777681
Re: [Netconf] How to grep through a YANG? With grepyangRe: [Netconf] How to grep through a YANG? With grepyang
Bert Wijnen (IETF)
2018-03-26
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/iGWdsBRLFmHA9dC9yAEaOG45H3Y/
2563477
1777681
Re: [Netconf] How to grep through a YANG? With grepyangRe: [Netconf] How to grep through a YANG? With grepyang
otilibil
2018-03-26
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/twvms79OCI8worJMw1lrvhYGL3M/
2563479
1777681
[Netconf] Fwd: Re: How to grep through a YANG? With grepyang[Netconf] Fwd: Re: How to grep through a YANG? With grepyang
otilibil
2018-03-30
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/5iYDsTUZgInIMnU4uK2y-M8SK_g/
2565567
1777681
[Netconf] mbj comments on draft-kwatsen-netconf-crypto-types-00[Netconf] mbj comments on draft-kwatsen-netconf-crypto-types-00
Martin Bjorklund
2018-03-21
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/eR9HGpIYovf7H_DKF5L--_pOfHg/
2561505
1777061
[Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?[Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?
Mahesh Jethanandani
2018-03-21
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/q-DmW_a22XcRwuOeSMasldKg3HI/
2561024
1776868
Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?
Juergen Schoenwaelder
2018-03-21
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/Ol-i66BAQsZl4iQCuPWZWT9ZasY/
2561042
1776868
Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?
Andy Bierman
2018-03-23
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/mBRwpuQtt5gNGTp6jjBJK03ZaUk/
2562944
1776868
Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?
Mahesh Jethanandani
2018-06-26
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/uWNTAFmCML2FVnf-8sK3kt4iUyQ/
2599437
1776868
Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?
Andy Bierman
2018-06-26
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/VhW-NzQfD_-PddwcAQCT-k7YUY8/
2599458
1776868
Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?
Mahesh Jethanandani
2018-06-29
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/oHcyDYi8ROWUAnupTdi2UJnoXDk/
2601077
1776868
Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?
Carsten Bormann
2018-06-29
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/59RtdoGwz5zOBNQiVHjMm0znzNo/
2601140
1776868
Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?
Juergen Schoenwaelder
2018-06-29
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/G4ObimUv7AuHWblVXr_rRoHzI-8/
2601149
1776868
Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?
Andy Bierman
2018-06-29
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/jdl8UPjxx1hVvKCG6h_kLMCo0es/
2601176
1776868
Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?Re: [Netconf] Issue #2 for binary encoding: Should the new encoding include the Message layer?
Carsten Bormann
2018-06-29
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/Gufm_2JN4PxKMFx9096SiBfdQ-A/
2601245
1776868
[Netconf] Do we need <activate> to indicate start of alternate form of encoding? #1 (Was: Re: NETCONF Encoding)[Netconf] Do we need <activate> to indicate start of alternate form of encoding? #1 (Was: Re: NETCONF Encoding)
Mahesh Jethanandani
2018-03-20
netconf
/arch/msg/netconf/SSq29JkyslQbu2pKed-6IDd96XU/
2560719
1776763