Subject
From
Date
List
Re: [tcpm] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-11.txtRe: [tcpm] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-11.txt
gorry
2015-05-22
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/-qHeHJjcE0fIvf6A5-Pz0viaoQ4/
2023611
1637428
Re: [tcpm] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-11.txtRe: [tcpm] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-11.txt
Mirja Kühlewind
2015-06-01
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/xzX6vXHmdbRoa7C_ENu_671AqF8/
2027714
1637428
[tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-11.txt[tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-11.txt
internet-drafts
2015-05-22
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/czDkT5EZGvQxaSrcj8f-1Er64ow/
2023605
1637429
[tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?[tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?
Tom Sanders
2015-05-20
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/2jQVqyu16VPCyQH4cEj4Y9jtVfs/
2022298
1637430
Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?
Rick Jones
2015-05-20
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/zzkNxfcImCBG0tLZhQ7Ob_aEFtc/
2022320
1637430
Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?
Tom Sanders
2015-05-20
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/UdXD62hwD4pxZ3UrdyxzGqQRjLw/
2022441
1637430
Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?
Rick Jones
2015-05-20
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/wS-fWN98pwy3WCK2eirWEZTuo6w/
2022448
1637430
Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?
Tom Sanders
2015-05-21
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/P1KNXNVnBF383Qmo51GQMqfUhnQ/
2022659
1637430
Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?
Mirja Kühlewind
2015-05-22
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/CkPC7JkMN7IpvU-rAfBKYYEd1eI/
2023391
1637430
Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?
Tom Sanders
2015-05-23
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/Bn1E9wFQFPUvkGxNRZYlbvd-2z8/
2023786
1637430
Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?
Gavin McCullagh
2015-05-23
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/hVCWJcupepXkwFmdzfxUbjbTva0/
2023820
1637430
Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?
Tom Sanders
2015-05-23
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/vOhNMTdx8y_9os1HmztPSS7CG1o/
2023842
1637430
Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?
Rick Jones
2015-05-23
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/VtUIvKjh3AkJlWcCkLPwjsrxksA/
2023889
1637430
Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?Re: [tcpm] Why is Cubic said to be RTT-fair?
Mirja Kühlewind
2015-06-01
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/eilOsDz3-CrNyEBKpRKq8Fim2gQ/
2027725
1637430
[tcpm] ip_local_reserved_ports impact on inet_csk_get_port (Linux)[tcpm] ip_local_reserved_ports impact on inet_csk_get_port (Linux)
Erik Hugne
2015-05-18
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/ET5Opzg-7N2ae4c_y3amfMJZ5K4/
2021138
1637431
Re: [tcpm] ip_local_reserved_ports impact on inet_csk_get_port (Linux)Re: [tcpm] ip_local_reserved_ports impact on inet_csk_get_port (Linux)
Christos Zoulas
2015-05-18
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/d9FLyfqvtb0vJz2xIxH5AokFlX4/
2021184
1637431
Re: [tcpm] ip_local_reserved_ports impact on inet_csk_get_port (Linux)Re: [tcpm] ip_local_reserved_ports impact on inet_csk_get_port (Linux)
Erik Hugne
2015-05-18
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/OmOkjCP3F-Lt8cb4_4AV6qsbLls/
2021324
1637431
Re: [tcpm] ip_local_reserved_ports impact on inet_csk_get_port (Linux)Re: [tcpm] ip_local_reserved_ports impact on inet_csk_get_port (Linux)
Christos Zoulas
2015-05-18
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/_bVpSRJYdwroStMhNulVdn17uqs/
2021346
1637431
[tcpm] WG acceptance of draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic[tcpm] WG acceptance of draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic
Scharf, Michael (Michael)
2015-05-18
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/Yfod5yLxwCg7-vpcXqWDyKUaykA/
2021117
1637432
[tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?[tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?
Bob Briscoe
2015-05-15
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/84N8OF4NHA83749m4BZ7Of06-6Q/
2020303
1637433
Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?
John Heffner
2015-05-15
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/UcFBnkwUtrGOWA04C3bISomxNvQ/
2020415
1637433
Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?
Yuchung Cheng
2015-05-15
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/r14Xf43t6HuwYbGFIGQnHea4bHM/
2020538
1637433
Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?
Ilpo Järvinen
2015-05-15
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/PNM8N4tNvwe2NSWrFNmwpraR-EI/
2020545
1637433
Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?
Bob Briscoe
2015-05-16
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/xpPUDs_rvVJdv5zJsOuyVJXT56o/
2020703
1637433
Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?
Yoshifumi Nishida
2015-05-18
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/_CBwjvc5OVBJucuLlG0E8Y3XcEs/
2021128
1637433
Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?
John Heffner
2015-05-18
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/bw3TE8E3DMvRwUTYEOmm0QC5x40/
2021256
1637433
Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?
Joe Touch
2015-05-18
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/3ujsb9rmfIzbEVWUSWZmQxZpA1Q/
2021262
1637433
Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?
Joe Touch
2015-05-18
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/VY35CW-b-41B38ozvdCTOhxSe4g/
2021398
1637433
Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?
Matt Mathis
2015-05-18
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/lwQu4cAwaEGb6oFZCj9rCaiNZrU/
2021405
1637433
Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?
Bob Briscoe
2015-05-19
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/1-y5X5sIsr83JlN343Ncst6ZVfE/
2021643
1637433
Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?
John Heffner
2015-05-19
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/II-khreh23nQQvKc-nYHl92UcWQ/
2021678
1637433
Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?
Ilpo Järvinen
2015-05-19
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/iFQV2BP7V_DdyW9sB9VZrs3fqt0/
2021721
1637433
Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?
Yuchung Cheng
2015-05-18
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/PTH-xkshxbXCEkzu4SkNA1w49So/
2021423
1637433
Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?
Bob Briscoe
2015-05-19
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/qLZgdiL3-Kp5WwvPCFhP3kBkKlI/
2021645
1637433
Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?Re: [tcpm] Why is the minimum ssthresh 2*SMSS (rather than 1)?
Joe Touch
2015-05-19
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/Ncar12QxCSXpCZkHv-C9yN31ViY/
2021860
1637433
[tcpm] Window update handling in the BSD TCP stack[tcpm] Window update handling in the BSD TCP stack
Lawrence Stewart
2015-05-14
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/q4AU-bjN1dIU2Nt-018n6n5unh0/
2019852
1637434
[tcpm] about synchronization losses in Cubic and draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic-01[tcpm] about synchronization losses in Cubic and draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic-01
Dino.LOPEZ
2015-05-13
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/oez4AQ4nA-Uymcr1v19-JjBw3tY/
2019274
1637435
[tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5925 (4365)[tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5925 (4365)
RFC Errata System
2015-05-12
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/-sG1MWHRwWMVoRtfKV_JFhQmZTo/
2020968
1637340
Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5925 (4365)Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5925 (4365)
Joe Touch
2015-05-12
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/GVZBdTLxazfYKNc6a_ceXcPIWUQ/
2018906
1637340
Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5925 (4365)Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5925 (4365)
Scharf, Michael (Michael)
2015-05-13
tcpm
/arch/msg/tcpm/AfKxU8hPG109y0L3cqn9gSGkRvk/
2019470
1637340