Re: [Trans] Verifying inclusion proofRe: [Trans] Verifying inclusion proof
Adam Eijdenberg
2015-07-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/8ilqKqh7r419TgwzUbFHA8NCgKg/
2045504
1646632
Re: [Trans] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis-01.txtRe: [Trans] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis-01.txt
Stephen Kent
2015-07-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/0po3KPVXzWgtjT3Bs8pUmWFop7Y/
2045459
1646628
[Trans] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis-01.txt[Trans] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis-01.txt
Melinda Shore
2015-07-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/IXvlC8_H095x97uvnG7VLj8zoS4/
2045417
1646628
[Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis-01.txt[Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis-01.txt
internet-drafts
2015-07-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/KzDqJTE-GQPjlvY3Ta9zqpWZNMM/
2045409
1646628
Re: [Trans] clarification on scope of 6962-bisRe: [Trans] clarification on scope of 6962-bis
Melinda Shore
2015-07-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/vQ4QV3tU2vIhDvGQrbloQ5Avxe4/
2045365
1646629
[Trans] clarification on scope of 6962-bis[Trans] clarification on scope of 6962-bis
Stephen Kent
2015-07-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/8jtS6Sm6ATJEuXoNbzxAneBCSEM/
2045266
1646629
Re: [Trans] [trans] #80 (rfc6962-bis): Re-introduce the issuer key hash into the PrecertificateRe: [Trans] [trans] #80 (rfc6962-bis): Re-introduce the issuer key hash into the Precertificate
Stephen Kent
2015-07-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/TEW5LQDlaxKy9z6lBe9OB9cywyo/
2045239
1646656
Re: [Trans] [trans] #80 (rfc6962-bis): Re-introduce the issuer key hash into the SCT (was: Re-introduce the issuer key hash into the Precertificate)Re: [Trans] [trans] #80 (rfc6962-bis): Re-introduce the issuer key hash into the SCT (was: Re-introduce the issuer key hash into the Precertificate)
trans issue tracker
2015-07-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/oiGV8h-Cdnhebk63A2o2QZYX0Us/
2044642
1646656
Re: [Trans] [trans] #80 (rfc6962-bis): Re-introduce the issuer key hash into the PrecertificateRe: [Trans] [trans] #80 (rfc6962-bis): Re-introduce the issuer key hash into the Precertificate
trans issue tracker
2015-07-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/PtvMiMKC4ZMN8_RYMmb74s_j6y8/
2044638
1646656
Re: [Trans] [trans] #80 (rfc6962-bis): Re-introduce the issuer key hash into the PrecertificateRe: [Trans] [trans] #80 (rfc6962-bis): Re-introduce the issuer key hash into the Precertificate
trans issue tracker
2015-07-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/tqZqSkxh5gemqIFzh-KyC_0ma8w/
2044475
1646656
Re: [Trans] [trans] #80 (rfc6962-bis): Re-introduce the issuer key hash into the PrecertificateRe: [Trans] [trans] #80 (rfc6962-bis): Re-introduce the issuer key hash into the Precertificate
trans issue tracker
2015-07-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/E50nPUG-XpyyNb94RbsSmgzYEgA/
2044458
1646656
Re: [Trans] [trans] #92 (rfc6962-bis): get-entries needs to return the whole X509ChainEntryRe: [Trans] [trans] #92 (rfc6962-bis): get-entries needs to return the whole X509ChainEntry
trans issue tracker
2015-07-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/ePdwr_HHg6Ro9t1pT9mC6e_6CTo/
2044360
1646630
Re: [Trans] [trans] #86 (rfc6962-bis): SCTs should be returned in final formatRe: [Trans] [trans] #86 (rfc6962-bis): SCTs should be returned in final format
trans issue tracker
2015-07-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Pt-Tjp1bTUgQDAlTt7KYtMHXXTw/
2044354
1646640
[Trans] [trans] #92 (rfc6962-bis): get-entries needs to return the whole X509ChainEntry[Trans] [trans] #92 (rfc6962-bis): get-entries needs to return the whole X509ChainEntry
trans issue tracker
2015-07-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/L_Z_DVCQ-ba4Hk10hwl_7TlR3NI/
2044334
1646630
Re: [Trans] Verifying inclusion proofRe: [Trans] Verifying inclusion proof
Matt Palmer
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/C-oohSUgWe2IkXPsskhmvN6SuY4/
2044139
1646632
Re: [Trans] [trans] #91 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify encoding of fields in the log client messagesRe: [Trans] [trans] #91 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify encoding of fields in the log client messages
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/V_sYbDA3Vl2dOoKC3ZEXSlqC7Fw/
2044095
1646631
Re: [Trans] [trans] #68 (rfc6962-bis): specification of sha-256 for the SCTRe: [Trans] [trans] #68 (rfc6962-bis): specification of sha-256 for the SCT
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/UPM7egoRsffIgM_SJt4K7v61Fnc/
2044094
1646693
Re: [Trans] [trans] #69 (rfc6962-bis): old data name (sha256_root_hash) in 3.6Re: [Trans] [trans] #69 (rfc6962-bis): old data name (sha256_root_hash) in 3.6
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/6MU9Z7ZHdc0PlUcV0zwEQQrkp5s/
2044093
1646692
Re: [Trans] [trans] #72 (rfc6962-bis): Section 2.1.4 cites specific algorithmsRe: [Trans] [trans] #72 (rfc6962-bis): Section 2.1.4 cites specific algorithms
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/y5loV4TixAxXeElK0nQ60hx-g7A/
2044088
1646677
Re: [Trans] [trans] #82 (rfc6962-bis): Add a way to get the SCTs for entries returned by get-entriesRe: [Trans] [trans] #82 (rfc6962-bis): Add a way to get the SCTs for entries returned by get-entries
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/tPUVN0tzCEer2mf1zBUj4TuvGJY/
2044086
1646654
Re: [Trans] [trans] #89 (rfc6962-bis): get-entries: "end" greater than "tree_size" should be allowedRe: [Trans] [trans] #89 (rfc6962-bis): get-entries: "end" greater than "tree_size" should be allowed
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/cjQ533z2vno2LzmI_UoerhUqYsc/
2044085
1646635
Re: [Trans] [trans] #72 (rfc6962-bis): Section 2.1.4 cites specific algorithmsRe: [Trans] [trans] #72 (rfc6962-bis): Section 2.1.4 cites specific algorithms
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/EaK8QlVrqCGYERIQSdUpSjhXqE8/
2044084
1646677
Re: [Trans] [trans] #88 (rfc6962-bis): get-entries: "end" should be greater-than-or-equal to "start"Re: [Trans] [trans] #88 (rfc6962-bis): get-entries: "end" should be greater-than-or-equal to "start"
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/xbLEOMe2tMcAKvleFBwzlpcSzaY/
2044083
1646636
Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm agility discussion is inadequateRe: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm agility discussion is inadequate
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/1TdYZUW0JIVdob3pzFxQtpnG2cY/
2044082
1646671
Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative client behavior specified in Section 5Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative client behavior specified in Section 5
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/9Gbkebc43GvUSFRj6WXCnqDlzxY/
2044081
1646672
Re: [Trans] [trans] #76 (rfc6962-bis): Normative client behavior specified in Section 3.4Re: [Trans] [trans] #76 (rfc6962-bis): Normative client behavior specified in Section 3.4
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/whfFNYRtSuMKiZPYQJE0fr6pExw/
2044080
1646673
Re: [Trans] [trans] #64 (rfc6962-bis): remove specification of signature and hash lags from section 2Re: [Trans] [trans] #64 (rfc6962-bis): remove specification of signature and hash lags from section 2
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/ilBtNcPwqnyYht3khhEWk1xDJtw/
2044078
1646697
Re: [Trans] [trans] #63 (rfc6962-bis): remove all normative references to client behaviorRe: [Trans] [trans] #63 (rfc6962-bis): remove all normative references to client behavior
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/_nLv49nmWAlnCGoop7FFwQ-FT9E/
2044073
1646698
Re: [Trans] [trans] #73 (rfc6962-bis): Section 3 text re log cert validation is ambiguousRe: [Trans] [trans] #73 (rfc6962-bis): Section 3 text re log cert validation is ambiguous
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Ldltqo72kIbl26xVFUyqa8q0Dh0/
2044062
1646676
Re: [Trans] [trans] #71 (rfc6962-bis): Section 1 does not define mis-issuanceRe: [Trans] [trans] #71 (rfc6962-bis): Section 1 does not define mis-issuance
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/b_D26W37XIZLO1v60dumdM7HjNM/
2044056
1646678
Re: [Trans] [trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec needs to define top-level extension syntaxRe: [Trans] [trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec needs to define top-level extension syntax
Stephen Kent
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/4AiW3mOe6viAQAgjDNwXNJCfETQ/
2044055
1646689
Re: [Trans] [trans] #65 (rfc6962-bis): remove section 5.4 and reference to "Auditor" in section 3Re: [Trans] [trans] #65 (rfc6962-bis): remove section 5.4 and reference to "Auditor" in section 3
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/c0xsyS2raHo0XdhqAqa-HVYq_aQ/
2044052
1646696
Re: [Trans] [trans] #74 (rfc6962-bis): normative statement of TLS client behavior in Section 3Re: [Trans] [trans] #74 (rfc6962-bis): normative statement of TLS client behavior in Section 3
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/gYRBfxY7sE1XLAYuZRYOhVdqHHc/
2044018
1646675
Re: [Trans] [trans] #75 (rfc6962-bis): run on sentence in section 3Re: [Trans] [trans] #75 (rfc6962-bis): run on sentence in section 3
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/sgMTHIb9SUKgwejV6vvyO9Zn84o/
2044015
1646674
Re: [Trans] [trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec needs to define top-level extension syntaxRe: [Trans] [trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec needs to define top-level extension syntax
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/ksmlm-2796hiiS5CxU0oXH_l0LE/
2044010
1646689
Re: [Trans] [trans] #80 (rfc6962-bis): Re-introduce the issuer key hash into the PrecertificateRe: [Trans] [trans] #80 (rfc6962-bis): Re-introduce the issuer key hash into the Precertificate
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/1Q-g9TEBbRqc84gzB-GJccxo3xA/
2044009
1646656
Re: [Trans] Verifying inclusion proofRe: [Trans] Verifying inclusion proof
Adam Eijdenberg
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/sYifcCJtIvbHlyETknRcIjn2TqQ/
2043856
1646632
Re: [Trans] Verifying inclusion proofRe: [Trans] Verifying inclusion proof
Ben Laurie
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/pF1Qc13OFxQMHh9PkzvEJ9_gSVY/
2043587
1646632
Re: [Trans] Verifying inclusion proofRe: [Trans] Verifying inclusion proof
Ben Laurie
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/EcAlfZrheelRFIkL0xFYVNEwJy4/
2043586
1646632
Re: [Trans] Verifying inclusion proofRe: [Trans] Verifying inclusion proof
Matt Palmer
2015-06-29
trans
/arch/msg/trans/vFm6p9adG86MHsgvx1dDfLdj-78/
2043277
1646632