[tsvwg] Re: [Teas] Re: Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics[tsvwg] Re: [Teas] Re: Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/ciBY4S6X-u5jBZj6WT-KOKvXEQo/
3486254
2143624
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/EKr_IiUueMdAayDkyBzn-UlCd6M/
3486170
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-23[tsvwg] Re: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-23
Greg White
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/ELs0lpF7Undjr08fyRObb5qEjdA/
3486154
2139726
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/2jym_H9E0j2YBCk2PRU1y1PsqvM/
3486143
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/VEbebpwkEPJLrJNZunf3elyRnDo/
3486003
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/6Smby5PXs3MMVKa7YJHBrr_SliY/
3485998
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/DlTKi2VDa9A2K4lfH6f9gnt-NDQ/
3485977
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/zxCwKhu9QvmRVgdDc-jM2WsqoeY/
3485970
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Greg White
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/kDJ95yRctSn-s5r0u6s8omLuoNM/
3485940
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/t0AS50J78bBOPtYuOYueDCLMC6A/
3485930
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/aDrZEseSO8Prqsx0nL2RJ3mOXcY/
3485896
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/5l6fwTfRaf6RmcZTLCFDuEEQJOs/
3485889
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/fXc0kgq3oHkC88jNs6dODylA-JM/
3485884
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [Teas] Re: Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics[tsvwg] Re: [Teas] Re: Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics
Vishnu Pavan Beeram
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/35cGG_LCYysrubZy8ldiXFDhTU0/
3485883
2143624
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/id76aPidGb6bts5ZSoqQeec07A0/
3485817
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Overcash, Michael (CCI-Atlanta)
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/PsxkQPys4nvj1uwj6aGVq9WRZWc/
3485814
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/mnvKaLTWeanJXNrkybsEW0l20Qc/
3485810
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/DY48teiFSVpMLQTyyWrkYOoqASY/
3485803
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/aQ3lZ4wHOwhKRZ-vrJRz7tTJgig/
3485798
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/815qSeH1T1zmeBok_CBrYUEJcRk/
3485795
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/zhwhUgqLoTiTlgv-qfnlR7K9chw/
3485785
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Overcash, Michael (CCI-Atlanta)
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/n3yI1RRMfBVL0oosESqyyVb5Zn4/
3485743
2144431
22 Messages