[v6ops] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-tiesel-v6ops-ipv6-app-testing[v6ops] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-tiesel-v6ops-ipv6-app-testing
Nick Buraglio
2025-12-05
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/NzxMRfIR4xlizxLx1aVr85g2_Ik/
3681943
2224758
[v6ops] Re: The V6OPS WG has placed draft-tiesel-v6ops-ipv6-app-testing in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"[v6ops] Re: The V6OPS WG has placed draft-tiesel-v6ops-ipv6-app-testing in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Timothy Winters
2025-12-05
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/N8npavLfHfdEE34Iwr40wmNzH2M/
3681891
2222879
[v6ops] Re: The V6OPS WG has placed draft-tiesel-v6ops-ipv6-app-testing in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"[v6ops] Re: The V6OPS WG has placed draft-tiesel-v6ops-ipv6-app-testing in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Kyle Ouellette
2025-12-05
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/csNKYdjpoCFy0UAAGh1h53Sv940/
3681887
2222879
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: New draft: "The IPv6 Loopback Address Prefix"[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: New draft: "The IPv6 Loopback Address Prefix"
Michael Richardson
2025-12-04
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/3ANGT9PajxfENzs8oKWUBKens94/
3681501
2223364
[v6ops] Re: Why I chose 1::/32 (Re: Re: [IPv6]Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?)[v6ops] Re: Why I chose 1::/32 (Re: Re: [IPv6]Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?)
Nick Buraglio
2025-12-04
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/WHOlQwWnqykgmdSlny3CrKVEtIA/
3681443
2224496
[v6ops] Re: public prefixes on loopback[v6ops] Re: public prefixes on loopback
David Farmer
2025-12-04
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/cRfRCZ19hTZCbZlGhdo_w09PQI8/
3681410
2224497
[v6ops] Re: Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?[v6ops] Re: Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?
Daryll Swer
2025-12-04
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/3yuKMXzH_iCseww_iFJE0trpCUs/
3681336
2224134
[v6ops] Re: Why I chose 1::/32 (Re: Re: [IPv6]Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?)[v6ops] Re: Why I chose 1::/32 (Re: Re: [IPv6]Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?)
Daryll Swer
2025-12-04
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/kdA7fhabNzvQoDIQoty1jWu7ozI/
3681334
2224496
[v6ops] Replying to Re: The V6OPS WG has placed draft-tiesel-v6ops-ipv6-app-testing in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"[v6ops] Replying to Re: The V6OPS WG has placed draft-tiesel-v6ops-ipv6-app-testing in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Tommy Jensen
2025-12-04
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/BvS7fxHsPrm_KkUYuHv9GjK_6iM/
3681308
2224511
[v6ops] Re: Why I chose 1::/32[v6ops] Re: Why I chose 1::/32
sthaug
2025-12-04
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/gW5dUSln8mC39ha279tQo92I5FI/
3681301
2224496
[v6ops] Re: Why I chose 1::/32 (Re: Re: [IPv6]Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?)[v6ops] Re: Why I chose 1::/32 (Re: Re: [IPv6]Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?)
Mark Smith
2025-12-04
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/XhLvvUflQwsrlhCLz1PuHSgXILg/
3681270
2224496
[v6ops] Re: Why I chose 1::/32 (Re: Re: [IPv6]Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?)[v6ops] Re: Why I chose 1::/32 (Re: Re: [IPv6]Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?)
Ole Trøan
2025-12-04
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/A9lDmkcPB94UIUy8yXl_MUBa4_Q/
3681266
2224496
[v6ops] Re: Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?[v6ops] Re: Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?
Mark Smith
2025-12-04
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/FByw4cAki-PyTIFC4pyMvAxqsgI/
3681257
2224134
[v6ops] Re: public prefixes on loopback[v6ops] Re: public prefixes on loopback
Brian E Carpenter
2025-12-04
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/cBGcoExY21hX9suM8xovWHzioQ0/
3681255
2224497
[v6ops] public prefixes on loopback[v6ops] public prefixes on loopback
Michael Richardson
2025-12-04
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/f0ehxHiCOh0R33Wp4Dq4H2pSguY/
3681251
2224497
[v6ops] Why I chose 1::/32 (Re: Re: [IPv6]Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?)[v6ops] Why I chose 1::/32 (Re: Re: [IPv6]Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?)
Mark Smith
2025-12-04
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Q5WEG2yT-i46wDf_UZP9Up5_UVM/
3681249
2224496
[v6ops] Re: Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?[v6ops] Re: Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?
Owen DeLong
2025-12-04
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/0SmcJKV4HDsmvjrGXU1ji-PYBw4/
3681241
2224134
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?
Nick Buraglio
2025-12-03
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/0gkdMK7zHe7No3Yxr7IKfll3Jpc/
3681197
2224134
[v6ops] Re: Advancing RFC7757, RFC7755, and RFC7756 to standard[v6ops] Re: Advancing RFC7757, RFC7755, and RFC7756 to standard
Nick Buraglio
2025-12-03
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/DwcI5in2xJUsJ7KF5qnMY0uRcpI/
3681195
2221646
[v6ops] Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dnsop-rfc6303-bis-00.txt[v6ops] Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dnsop-rfc6303-bis-00.txt
Tim Wicinski
2025-12-03
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Ex8sB2vTbzxbO6Qwk2t3RDDBEIE/
3681023
2224219
[v6ops] Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dnsop-rfc6303-bis-00.txt[v6ops] Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dnsop-rfc6303-bis-00.txt
mohamed.boucadair
2025-12-03
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/q9GXSXUIJUQPW9EuvferswtYu3M/
3680808
2224219
[v6ops] Re: Advancing RFC7757, RFC7755, and RFC7756 to standard[v6ops] Re: Advancing RFC7757, RFC7755, and RFC7756 to standard
jordi.palet@consulintel.es
2025-12-03
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ochTwpZ-WDpQuLKnXna3ItLItYc/
3680764
2221646
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?
David Farmer
2025-12-03
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/wRQDoYr5c2tCOX0tc7FZYx0LIZs/
3680736
2224134
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]New draft: "The IPv6 Loopback Address Prefix"[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]New draft: "The IPv6 Loopback Address Prefix"
Michael Siegenthaler
2025-12-03
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/c-jefEUPT72ZmigoT4YylQAdrBQ/
3680722
2223364
[v6ops] Re: Advancing RFC7757, RFC7755, and RFC7756 to standard[v6ops] Re: Advancing RFC7757, RFC7755, and RFC7756 to standard
Michael Richardson
2025-12-03
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ypBZEpDgB4Ybc_AqQMgfeVp0C_Q/
3680671
2221646
[v6ops] Re: Advancing RFC7757, RFC7755, and RFC7756 to standard[v6ops] Re: Advancing RFC7757, RFC7755, and RFC7756 to standard
Brian E Carpenter
2025-12-02
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/BLdgQ3NOi8Lalw650wQLLfc4uSA/
3680529
2221646
[v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dnsop-rfc6303-bis-00.txt[v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dnsop-rfc6303-bis-00.txt
Tim Wicinski
2025-12-02
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/uKTRXzJF1G9ETmFohAxnmTq1144/
3680503
2224219
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?
Michael Richardson
2025-12-02
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/-adxdk5ZGyhKxMO9fPCE1xnEBTY/
3680452
2224134
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: New draft: "The IPv6 Loopback Address Prefix"[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: New draft: "The IPv6 Loopback Address Prefix"
Michael Richardson
2025-12-02
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/b7O0rBZ0TYCoYD03y-gg1kuqxMI/
3680436
2223364
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: New draft: "The IPv6 Loopback Address Prefix"[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: New draft: "The IPv6 Loopback Address Prefix"
Philipp S. Tiesel
2025-12-02
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/6WeW8OxsJfMsCHNbLNWA0mOE9K4/
3680424
2223364
[v6ops] Re: The V6OPS WG has placed draft-tiesel-v6ops-ipv6-app-testing in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"[v6ops] Re: The V6OPS WG has placed draft-tiesel-v6ops-ipv6-app-testing in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Nick Buraglio
2025-12-02
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/dlWuGo2-jj_71TsfiOXBm3-Kem0/
3680418
2222879
[v6ops] Re: Advancing RFC7757, RFC7755, and RFC7756 to standard[v6ops] Re: Advancing RFC7757, RFC7755, and RFC7756 to standard
Nick Buraglio
2025-12-02
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/pxWa85JPKQmDJaUArLpoj0s7aKQ/
3680413
2221646
[v6ops] Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?[v6ops] Why not add loopback semantics to 2001:db8::/32?
Mark Smith
2025-12-02
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/2UY9AN-v_HtK3fBMXFiFssuA6o4/
3680226
2224134
[v6ops] Re: The IPv6 Loopback Address Prefix - a couple of options[v6ops] Re: The IPv6 Loopback Address Prefix - a couple of options
James Harr
2025-12-02
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/2GhT5JpC7L7jFsJaLLRYZn8clgU/
3680183
2223486
[v6ops] Re: The IPv6 Loopback Address Prefix - a couple of options[v6ops] Re: The IPv6 Loopback Address Prefix - a couple of options
Owen DeLong
2025-12-01
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/W758zM8DWlq4I_6ZtztSKMx7iJo/
3680030
2223486
[v6ops] Re: The IPv6 Loopback Address Prefix - a couple of options[v6ops] Re: The IPv6 Loopback Address Prefix - a couple of options
David Farmer
2025-12-01
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/uF_wgBAIuc10E0JRZQJ6zt3A2Mo/
3679989
2223486
[v6ops] Re: New draft: ASN Prefix-based Addressing for IPv6[v6ops] Re: New draft: ASN Prefix-based Addressing for IPv6
David Farmer
2025-12-01
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/6Q_Fatsu_ViQi9kM85C-yA3Dbcs/
3679825
2223555
[v6ops] Re: The V6OPS WG has placed draft-tiesel-v6ops-ipv6-app-testing in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"[v6ops] Re: The V6OPS WG has placed draft-tiesel-v6ops-ipv6-app-testing in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Tim Wicinski
2025-11-30
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ULAj7m_3wamszV_K6kzCsPKf4cA/
3679525
2222879
[v6ops] Re: New draft: ASN Prefix-based Addressing for IPv6[v6ops] Re: New draft: ASN Prefix-based Addressing for IPv6
John Kristoff
2025-11-29
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/72jrIyPkyhfKerwlNJtEG95b9aI/
3679303
2223555
[v6ops] Re: New draft: ASN Prefix-based Addressing for IPv6[v6ops] Re: New draft: ASN Prefix-based Addressing for IPv6
Erik Kline
2025-11-29
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/LK2rnsExiU0MitThaLq-EzXVMWE/
3679236
2223555