Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Ryan Sleevi
2013-08-15
websec
/arch/msg/websec/gM1kovdYkEY3efKq23eJteU5eds/
1505331
1665095
[websec] ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09.txt>[websec] ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09.txt>
IETF Secretariat
2013-08-15
websec
/arch/msg/websec/CZH7CsNNAekIjfEEAvKB9j3Cn84/
1505332
1665081
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Yoav Nir
2013-08-15
websec
/arch/msg/websec/H6U0DWtlXfRMPcTIPhZPWXPJScw/
1505330
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Tobias Gondrom
2013-08-15
websec
/arch/msg/websec/x8YZPwLt9PmhiXx6wjdEQy4CKjA/
1505329
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Yoav Nir
2013-08-15
websec
/arch/msg/websec/JPXz9L9krV8-tSis3rIIdnKd0vI/
1505328
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Trevor Perrin
2013-08-15
websec
/arch/msg/websec/WBBlsVWRPu7eeDZjLAGo2oPWXvI/
1505325
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Gervase Markham
2013-08-15
websec
/arch/msg/websec/FmIto1kYkAuFC6dKoIRXcJeBLiY/
1505324
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Trevor Perrin
2013-08-15
websec
/arch/msg/websec/C5R8aFUmrdMdMRdiJzp7rmbHPZY/
1505323
1665095
[websec] Joel Jaeggli's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)[websec] Joel Jaeggli's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)
Joel Jaeggli
2013-08-15
websec
/arch/msg/websec/P8w8n7I2HwQWPOy6EMJj_G5kIC0/
1505322
1665075
Re: [websec] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)Re: [websec] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)
Pete Resnick
2013-08-15
websec
/arch/msg/websec/5XcPRcxrTTgeh3P-PIA_-SmCbq4/
1505327
1665078
[websec] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)[websec] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Richard Barnes
2013-08-15
websec
/arch/msg/websec/VsQC5VXxdVSUNTYGsJbOR253M5U/
1505321
1665076
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Gervase Markham
2013-08-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/GQX9XQ0eLQmpawIoU5q4oiU_UNs/
1505320
1665095
[websec] Stephen Farrell's Yes on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)[websec] Stephen Farrell's Yes on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)
Stephen Farrell
2013-08-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Rl--nXsZbGP4m4Om3tS-VSsDGLg/
1505319
1665077
Re: [websec] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)Re: [websec] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)
Barry Leiba
2013-08-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/bGV4dlPCQzvtD9BniggUKgX8Cf0/
1505318
1665078
[websec] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)[websec] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)
Pete Resnick
2013-08-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/8C2jSaX6hxilPvjn4ZmQ3eP8AII/
1505326
1665078
Re: [websec] Ted Lemon's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)Re: [websec] Ted Lemon's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)
Ted Lemon
2013-08-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/JOGzKhmcOyfs1lyDS7_ci4FflBY/
1505317
1665079
Re: [websec] Ted Lemon's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)Re: [websec] Ted Lemon's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)
Tobias Gondrom
2013-08-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/EMa7pJlNvxvDeU-foRhxpiHZxwU/
1505316
1665079
Re: [websec] Sean Turner's Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [websec] Sean Turner's Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Tobias Gondrom
2013-08-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/bPPLoes5llYA4DxcF9qP0TPZye8/
1505315
1665080
Re: [websec] Sean Turner's Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [websec] Sean Turner's Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Ted Lemon
2013-08-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Hc7mkQjt9Es_JKFnfPTB4rJzU_E/
1505314
1665080
[websec] Ted Lemon's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)[websec] Ted Lemon's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)
Ted Lemon
2013-08-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/3VIWyp59HIW924wtlTYvocEEV_s/
1505313
1665079
Re: [websec] Sean Turner's Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [websec] Sean Turner's Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Tobias Gondrom
2013-08-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/1OCjuvD2w7CKXwiuatVDbYVgkuA/
1505312
1665080
Re: [websec] Sean Turner's Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [websec] Sean Turner's Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Ted Lemon
2013-08-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/b9gWv53ktagXBnx1TW11Xufi3nE/
1505311
1665080
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Yoav Nir
2013-08-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/A5LAEqSnX8pLtqStzbuKOXQSk8E/
1505310
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Trevor Perrin
2013-08-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/u3oZrrXnBxsiSPdF8IjytiiTwug/
1505309
1665095
Re: [websec] Sean Turner's Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [websec] Sean Turner's Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Yoav Nir
2013-08-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/sWYrMcUdvQSgMMZZRs0m8UeirKs/
1505308
1665080
Re: [websec] Sean Turner's Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [websec] Sean Turner's Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Tobias Gondrom
2013-08-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/7_9J9gn_QUc0NxY_2-QhtN4hg44/
1505307
1665080
Re: [websec] Sean Turner's Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [websec] Sean Turner's Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Barry Leiba
2013-08-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/oNaQb8PXTahH3-cQW0tzXrbEuic/
1505306
1665080
[websec] Sean Turner's Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)[websec] Sean Turner's Discuss on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Sean Turner
2013-08-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/pe0Uc6BvKEt79ljbGB-ZdxG5d3k/
1505305
1665080
Re: [websec] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-07Re: [websec] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-07
Robert Sparks
2013-08-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/NwCC7zrrzFrC66cKetcwAebWWFQ/
1505304
1665089
[websec] ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09.txt>[websec] ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09.txt>
IETF Secretariat
2013-08-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/sjLa--l4QT_WEEacJv3EOhyKyBQ/
1505303
1665081
[websec] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09.txt[websec] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09.txt
internet-drafts
2013-08-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/7OCT6erMCThG_BEde6V_qFpaO5w/
1505302
1665082
[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09.txt[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09.txt
internet-drafts
2013-08-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/DKXe8evCgGWAQm0mQGkd3F75DsY/
1505301
1665083
Re: [websec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-08: (with COMMENT)Re: [websec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-08: (with COMMENT)
Tobias Gondrom
2013-08-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/29uq5XnEWXmo1kT-sZ6fBPpoTuo/
1505300
1665084
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Gervase Markham
2013-08-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/DzDA5skkz0l0FmwL5NrCTcTgWTc/
1505298
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Trevor Perrin
2013-08-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/wuY-1Tg1LhH0rdqDOQ_0_sG3-lQ/
1505297
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Trevor Perrin
2013-08-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/1h5AZEGvevb6A2gSdWgbntTp6oY/
1505296
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Jeremy Rowley
2013-08-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/H3YiV2NjecLzpZaD2HrXfyZKj1Q/
1505295
1665095
[websec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-08: (with COMMENT)[websec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-08: (with COMMENT)
Spencer Dawkins
2013-08-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/yo8PngEx8o1BewZfuNh-A2wlUvw/
1505299
1665084
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Trevor Perrin
2013-08-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/tDHYuD75EGktV6y9q69t6FLFlGM/
1505294
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Ryan Sleevi
2013-08-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/PIJ31y-WZ1_gEnotubd5h6UZYQA/
1505293
1665095