Re: [106attendees] Signs with room names

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Mon, 18 November 2019 08:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: 106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACD0120881; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:12:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.4, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L4JakZn05LRY; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:12:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 843FC1200B2; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:12:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-8a04.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-8a04.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.138.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 458832421173; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 08:12:04 +0000 (UTC)
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Message-Id: <ED045D50-398F-4E15-809E-D5FB620D4B35@rfc1035.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_35E38D2A-A88A-40DA-B18F-98707F718329"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 08:12:01 +0000
In-Reply-To: <740C581B-62DC-484D-BF7C-304A7CDA354E@timwattenberg.de>
Cc: 106attendees@ietf.org, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org>
To: Tim Wattenberg <mail@timwattenberg.de>
References: <740C581B-62DC-484D-BF7C-304A7CDA354E@timwattenberg.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/106attendees/zbwPbpiJ_F-A0e7pFHUj3C7TEdA>
Subject: Re: [106attendees] Signs with room names
X-BeenThere: 106attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 106 attendees for official communication <106attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/106attendees>, <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/106attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:106attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/106attendees>, <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 08:12:08 -0000


> On 18 Nov 2019, at 07:58, Tim Wattenberg <mail@timwattenberg.de> wrote:
> 
> As we have the first room changes between sessions, I noticed that the signs/screens telling the room names are not ideal.

It would be even nicer if the screens outside the rooms said which WG was taking place inside.

And while I'm whining, could one of the two down escalators on the fourth floor be changed to go up? That would make it easier to move between the food outlets in the basement and the meeting rooms.