IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [107attendees] IETF 107 Standard Registration and Internet Draft Deadline Approaching

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr> Fri, 06 March 2020 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: 107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 107attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EAE3A0EA4; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 04:48:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id punY2qBr77Kr; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 04:48:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 499A93A0EA1; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 04:48:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 6135B280191; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 13:48:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5ACAB2806DE; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 13:48:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (unknown [10.1.50.11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531FE280191; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 13:48:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.users.prive.nic.fr [10.10.86.133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBA667F2EC0; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 13:48:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CF8BE3FD75; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 13:48:13 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 13:48:13 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: 107attendees@ietf.org, Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200306124813.GA26396@nic.fr>
References: <158344386661.14598.13307571424986389922@ietfa.amsl.com> <4295F611-DDB6-4BCB-AFF3-B7F313C6C9A6@sobco.com> <19D579B6-E81E-47BE-9881-6DFA3D5173D1@ietf.org> <5B5288DF-2E4E-417B-94A7-B0E7A89FB9B5@sobco.com> <C5159B8D-46A0-44FF-B5C1-15CA524B8ED2@me.com> <CF47024C-EC16-4503-99B5-997CD4D13B66@ietf.org> <913D117B-731D-4C5A-8A5F-0949E6E7D3AD@tzi.org> <09A1A713-3C6D-4DC2-8A69-999FE76806F6@ietf.org> <170ad423be0.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <170ad423be0.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 10.3
X-Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-8-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000069, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2019.11.5.63017
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/107attendees/e0fNvpqB5GZZKe3fLF6wUiD04s4>
Subject: Re: [107attendees] IETF 107 Standard Registration and Internet Draft Deadline Approaching
X-BeenThere: 107attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 107 attendees for official communication <107attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/107attendees>, <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/107attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:107attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/107attendees>, <mailto:107attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:48:37 -0000

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 07:33:08PM -0500,
 Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote 
 a message of 115 lines which said:

> 1) Everyone's situation is different / unique and often more
> complicated than simply who is canceling. I strongly urge you, the
> LLC and the iesg to have a single consistent, and public, refund
> policy for all.

I find the current policy simple to understand, consistent and fair. I
don't see why the IETF should reimburse if some companies find
suitable to override official advices and to ban travels to places
like Canada, where the risk is low.

I hope that the LLC will keep its head cold, even if many companies do
not.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email