IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [110attendees] tools agendas

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 08 March 2021 14:50 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: 110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 110attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F5E3A2B88; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 06:50:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1FmQsg-Lrnkc; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 06:50:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 775AF3A2B90; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 06:50:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unformal.local ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 128Eo063006906 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Mar 2021 08:50:00 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1615215003; bh=n4su2Xo7stpZ0GjB60UT2d8MPU5EET4a9BlWBU10Jqw=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=h1A3fykwHF1qJfnUqJ7sX11/nUSLCsZrbWqPGkggQZ03VYGMt2U3InIhX7C0yKxIO 03MkC9I21WSIfSUPe2MoiE8QTPleHAX6QusRM6DqwhqcPBdYESbW8s+IvcAPrHuAxE tT+0wrov+Uhz3FU7GRL3ULAJqw0rOGnubl6tCWIQ=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.local
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Greg Wood <ghwood@ietf.org>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: 110attendees <110attendees@ietf.org>
References: <m24khmped1.wl-randy@psg.com> <B11F5816-06EB-4000-BA2B-8D936DA5EE17@ietf.org> <EF1CF0822A4C9C5550F2DBCF@PSB>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <8f9a2db1-9e50-d7de-2736-f215b607a16b@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:49:55 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <EF1CF0822A4C9C5550F2DBCF@PSB>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/110attendees/LhMkMB3xxaF1yPLUqnaEHYQcHAQ>
Subject: Re: [110attendees] tools agendas
X-BeenThere: 110attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 110 attendees <110attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/110attendees>, <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/110attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:110attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/110attendees>, <mailto:110attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 14:50:09 -0000

John -

Henrik has corrected the tools agenda for this meeting. But in the long 
term, yes, the plan is for the datatracker to hold the agenda that gets 
used. If there are features that the datatracker does not provide, 
please point them out on the thread on tools-discuss.

(I have captured the "subscribe by specific session" requirement for 
calendaring already).

RjS

On 3/8/21 8:01 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
> Greg,
>
> Does your response translate into "the tools agenda has
> basically been abandoned"?
>
> For those of us who find benefits in the tools agenda that are
> not available in the standard one, that is a fairly serious
> loss, especially finding out after the meeting has nominally
> started.
>
>     john
>
> --On Monday, March 8, 2021 06:18 -0500 Greg Wood
> <ghwood@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Randy,
>>
>> Please see the IETF Datatracker for more current meeting
>> agenda information:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/agenda/
>>
>> The idr wg agenda is at:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/agenda-110-
>> idr-03
>>
>> Hope that helps,
>>
>> -Greg
>>
>>> On Mar 7, 2021, at 9:29 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> starting on https://tools.ietf.org/agenda/110/ i choose a
>>> wg's link, e.g. https://tools.ietf.org/wg/idr/ and then click
>>> on Agendas.  i get
>>>
>>>     IETF-110 idr agenda
>>>     Sorry, no agenda available as of today. Either no meeting
>>>     was held, or the document has not yet been submitted.
>>>
>>> i strongly suspect the idr wg has an agenda for this week.
>>> same for every wg i tested.
>>>
>>> randy
>>>
>>> ---
>>> randy@psg.com
>>> `gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd
>>> randy@psg.com` signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header
>>> mangling
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> 110attendees mailing list
>>> 110attendees@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/110attendees
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Greg Wood
>> IETF LLC
>> +1-703-625-3917
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email