Re: [119attendees] Worst IETF hotel ever?

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Tue, 19 March 2024 23:41 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: 119attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 119attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD3BC14F5FC for <119attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kyKsDnc84GP9 for <119attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C140C14F5F2 for <119attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (dhcp-8280.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.130.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8440D2420E4A; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 23:40:59 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <F0B0AD4A-A203-40A6-89BB-E2845A98E51F@apnic.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 23:40:55 +0000
Cc: "119attendees@ietf.org" <119attendees@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C8681B45-CC52-4F5B-94DD-7B557FA94FEC@rfc1035.com>
References: <7134b79c-1269-475b-9c00-c718eeb3b661@gmail.com> <687b49e08a550c2e21a9e66ecad018a7@doria.org> <FE25D332-FB2D-47DD-BB1B-3EF1DAFF1CBF@live555.com> <be5f476f-bcb3-4969-aa98-9f77ef035acf@labs.htt-consult.com> <CAA=duU07RpmWjCS6B3d=gjcT4JRhXcFCWx1YFNA=iS6g_NRpng@mail.gmail.com> <F0B0AD4A-A203-40A6-89BB-E2845A98E51F@apnic.net>
To: George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/119attendees/JBXYmfnuPzDCFNxvXHvherb-yVo>
Subject: Re: [119attendees] Worst IETF hotel ever?
X-BeenThere: 119attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 119 attendees <119attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/119attendees>, <mailto:119attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/119attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:119attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:119attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/119attendees>, <mailto:119attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 23:41:10 -0000


> On 19 Mar 2024, at 23:33, George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net> wrote:
> 
> the Vancouver hotel with new form "name your floor I select the elevator" mechanism which did not have congestion control…

In Scotland, "name your floor" lifts have bigger problems:
	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMS2VnDveP8