Re: [3gpp-ietf-coord] 3GPP review on draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-13

["Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <[e-mail]>]

Lionel,

Thank you for your prompt reply and I fully understand that weeks after a dense meeting are busier than usual (I am only recovering from IETF-115!).

Let's synch up again week of 5th of December then.

Regards

-éric


From: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Date: Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 12:22
To: Eric Vyncke <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Cc: Gonzalo Camarillo <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, lp-wan <[e-mail]>, Erik Kline <[e-mail]>, Lars Eggert <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: 3GPP review on draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-13

Hi Eric,

We have discussed the LS last week during the 3GPP WG meetings in Toulouse. Because people were busy during the meeting week and the next one, it was said that any feedback from the delegates can only be provided at the end of the week or next week. It is aligned with my own comment during the coordination meeting.
I hope if it is fine.

Regards,

Lionel



Orange Restricted
De : Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[e-mail]>
Envoyé : mardi 22 novembre 2022 11:52
À : [e-mail]; MORAND Lionel INNOV/NET <[e-mail]>
Cc : Gonzalo Camarillo <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; lp-wan <[e-mail]>; Erik Kline <[e-mail]>; Lars Eggert <[e-mail]>
Objet : 3GPP review on draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot-13

Lionel, Gonzalo, and others,

After our 3GPP-IETF coordination meeting in London on the 8th of November 2022 (2 weeks ago), and if not mistaken, 3GPP was about to review draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot in the line of the 2 existing liaison statements [1] [2] during last week 3GPP meeting.

Did such discussion take place during the 3GPP meeting ?

Was there any decision ? Notably:
1/ is the current IETF draft ready to go from 3GPP point of view ? (any technical issues ? is the wording about information/normative ok ?)
2/ else, should the informative parts (use of SCHC compression by a future 3GPP release) be better tagged/introduced as informative only (we did our best) ?
3/ else, should the informative parts be moved to an appendix  (breaking the flow hence a big work by the authors)?
4/ any other comment ?

Thank you very much in advance for any piece of information,

Regards

-éric

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1480/ (dated 2016... IETF was rather slow to act on 3GPP demand :-( ....)
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1796/ (dated 2022)


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.