Re(2): [67ATTENDEES] Anyone get the 'broadband' connection in the IETFhotel

"Peter Lovell" <peter.lovell@sparta.com> Wed, 08 November 2006 19:06 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhslF-0000sC-SM; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:06:57 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhslE-0000s6-EN for 67attendees@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:06:56 -0500
Received: from m4.sparta.com ([157.185.61.2]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhslD-0002K9-0M for 67attendees@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:06:56 -0500
Received: from Beta5.sparta.com (beta5.sparta.com [157.185.63.21]) by M4.sparta.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id kA8J6pdW023365; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:06:51 -0600
Received: from nemo.columbia.ads.sparta.com (nemo.columbia.sparta.com [157.185.80.75]) by Beta5.sparta.com (8.12.11/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kA8J6nv3020356; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:06:51 -0600
Received: from [130.129.69.93] ([157.185.80.253]) by nemo.columbia.ads.sparta.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:06:48 -0500
From: Peter Lovell <peter.lovell@sparta.com>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>, "T.J. Kniveton" <tj@kniveton.com>
Subject: Re(2): [67ATTENDEES] Anyone get the 'broadband' connection in the IETFhotel
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:06:45 -0800
Message-Id: <20061108190645.1531119700@127.0.0.1>
In-Reply-To: <455228A2.5020403@dougbarton.us>
References: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F0BB1A1FC@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com> <455 12FCA.9010708@kniveton.com> <20061108013840.GA17635@nokia.com> <45513C5B.30900 07@levkowetz.com> <45515822.9020201@ktrc-na.com> <45521DEA.30803@kniveton.com> <455228A2.5020403@dougbarton.us>
X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail version 5.5 build 4456 English (intel) <http://www.ctmdev.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Nov 2006 19:06:48.0214 (UTC) FILETIME=[0A45BB60:01C70369]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2
Cc: 67attendees@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: 67attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 67 Attendess <67attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/67attendees>, <mailto:67attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/67attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:67attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:67attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/67attendees>, <mailto:67attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 67attendees-bounces@ietf.org

>T.J. Kniveton wrote:
>
>> I thought the WTR54G was a nice solution too, especially for $19 at 
>> Fry's.. until I bought one and it didn't work at all.
>
>Unfortunately Linksys changed the internals on that model without 
>changing the model number. Up through version 4.x the WRT54G (and 
>WRT54GS) ran Linux under the hood, and were prized by hackers 
>everywhere. Version 5 switched to VxWorks internals (and cut the ram 
>in half), and there have been lots of problems reported.
>
>If you can find a WRT54G with versions in the 3.x or 4.x ranges, or 
>one of the newer WRT54GL models (the L stands for Linux), you'll be 
>fine, but they are more expensive. Here is a URL for those interested 
>in more info:
>
>http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4729641740.html
>
>I myself have 2 of the old Linux based models, and have never had a 
>single problem with them.
>
>hth,
>
>Doug
>
>-- 


The Buffalo one is similar to the earlier Linksys one with regard to
being hackable. There are DD-WRT versions available for it too.

Cheers.....Peter


_______________________________________________
67ATTENDEES mailing list
67ATTENDEES@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/67attendees