Re: [6gip] wanted to ask as a software engineer

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Sat, 16 July 2022 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7353FC14792A for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 07:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.662
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.662 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fVriaHc1MUIo for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 07:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C242C14F736 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 07:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 26GEmlaw064834 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 16:48:47 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 77863201B8D for <6gip@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 16:48:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE18201B7B for <6gip@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 16:48:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.14.0.99] ([10.14.0.99]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 26GEmlYd003055 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 16:48:48 +0200
Message-ID: <a89a8734-64ff-a8bd-bd7c-aa057effabc0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 16:48:47 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: fr
To: 6gip@ietf.org
References: <CAB_544VKe_hAPiykc-vCW-bR4Oqj1cQh9roF4R17eR8ZOar8jQ@mail.gmail.com> <BE1P281MB285483D05E3C3A54A795E568D1879@BE1P281MB2854.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAB_544U0-FZc6Xrg0c-omGG_GZErWgFTPYQ9Q15Q91EzMkycrw@mail.gmail.com> <d8ad8d3c-3fbc-bea0-d9ff-0585cbed295e@gmail.com> <m1cze9t44w.fsf@switch.ch> <89a73b81-5c5e-e6cd-aa77-10b95e61b7cd@gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <89a73b81-5c5e-e6cd-aa77-10b95e61b7cd@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6gip/H4sNtXlI8iNGHVR8qZGuOtB2Bqk>
Subject: Re: [6gip] wanted to ask as a software engineer
X-BeenThere: 6gip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Issues in 6th Generation Mobile Network System \(6gip\)" <6gip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6gip/>
List-Post: <mailto:6gip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 14:48:54 -0000

I run my own tests too.  It is from someone's 5G smartphone on Free 
mobile operator at 3640-3710MHz band, with speedtest app on android.

APN IPv4: DL 224mbit/s, UL 8.24mbit/s, RTT 39ms.
APN IPv6: DL 178mbit/s, UL 14.9mbit/s, RTT 55ms.

There were a few minutes between the two tests.

(in theory, an APN IPv6 would only give an IPv6 address to the 
smartphone, but whatismyip shows I have an IPv4 address too even if on 
an APN of type IPv6; this is contrary to intuitition, because it does 
not allow to say whether the speeedtest while on APN IPv6 was an IPv6 
speedtest or an IPv4 speedtest; on another hand, while on an APN IPv4 
one is sure there is no IPv6 whatsoever).

The user experience on 5G is that I felt the download was really fast 
when I downloaded the 50mbyte speedtest app from Google Play.

Alex

Le 16/07/2022 à 15:56, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit :
> 
> 
> Le 13/07/2022 à 17:37, Simon Leinen a écrit :
>> Alexandre Petrescu writes:
>>> Do you know what bandwidth is possible on a 5G smartphone?
>>> (browse www.speedtest.net from a 5G smartphone)
>>
>> Some numbers from the real world:
>>
>> I've been doing a few tests with the Ookla Speedtest app on my Google
>> Pixel 6 phone when connected to 5G service on one of the Swiss mobile
>> networks (Sunrise/Yallo).
>>
>> The download rates are often 250-300Mb/s.  Upload rates are much lower,
>> typical values are 20Mb/s, but I have seen as low as 5Mb/s even when
>> downloads are as fast as mentioned.  (OK, 5Mb/s is not too shabby, but
>> the down/upload discrepancy impresses me.)
> 
> Thanks for the figures.
> 
> This 250-300mb/s looks high to me, used to a 4G max around 50mbit/s.
> 
> I will try to identify my own figures, but I have to ask someone close 
> for a 5G smartphone to try.  I dont myself have a smartphone.
> 
>> The base RTT is relatively low (10-20ms), but can easily grow to
>> 300-1000ms during download and (especially) upload tests.
> 
> Thanks for this report.
> 
> For comparison, I did hear about a minim 20ms on a satellite LEO 
> Internet link (Starlink).  This is a point of jonction.
> 
>>
>> Sunrise seems to be using the 700, 1400, and 3500MHz bands for 5G.
>> [citation needed]
> 
> I suspect the highest bandwidth is in the 3500MHz bands.
> 
> Alex
> 
>>
>> Cheers,
>