Re: [6lo] Short Hierarchial IPv6 addresses

Haoyu Song <haoyu.song@futurewei.com> Wed, 10 November 2021 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <haoyu.song@futurewei.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D62F3A142E; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:25:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.089
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.089 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=futurewei.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EwZRCC4u0bFS; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:25:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam11on2139.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.220.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 460A93A1409; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:25:31 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jY/i19G4nM4ZIax9oKBlH+fvKknjJALm3FWeVYZuwb7o3GeEV8BgbwBOtsMYi3aiqLamqBeo0UziAvLpLpVeCPDXL8M9cTmcXmN5c2idiiHawXHnBFfTK9wJsLBZWuIeTCaVqDrPfOpwPANdvI6TTml2jy8lvExErgrOj+D8ep41zkD6RkeVLAp2BuXUIJiYm9Tu4ax/B81sJrwiQwWIf+VV+VzPuPAaM70sIVl/mI3/b+maxRyiFA2s2o201E9Ph+wjZ5xSTy0ygSfCZdBfdTemY8CcfZSbJQF6Q5x4JWN3t2GW5KbzjbLvWTegrXWwNd9D0dE+yGCP1xm9eVaBuA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=1S7DGDRFir5MGsrpoXCNC1J9Sny8/umqj0o8bc7VuBQ=; b=b1MxtHlkUNlu6oV6xTtEz8AOrzkLxoGOLNcENtaYa+pfvRLcDz3bA7EWg5b4/0BDAbtvOHvOJ/MeDVOTVMa/ZLzE0M85lQg0wYtfPX4uZfOarnSEbdAG873DVUxFOBIlV1mAk8/QkjNePyAMuKcvpYfGUFC2qzTfNQ18/0gdwljoUyd9qpntC+9lRdcFBFb4gCYHakdOs/EWEbQ+Bj3hz/nE/JTSFvNvRPcL5M1XvURT7YO8iD4kUG2BNo0rqIy+QBZwOd3LeS783msXm+67iBMPnWbuaEQDUH/kiN2C4kVdfqHGf0dY9oNMDCu1ty8nrKiO7NIEV+YUyc4EcSJJDQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=futurewei.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=futurewei.com; dkim=pass header.d=futurewei.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Futurewei.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=1S7DGDRFir5MGsrpoXCNC1J9Sny8/umqj0o8bc7VuBQ=; b=sRw/VCNIBME5MCt1DeN6H3vwI1MoZP722cbNmaCUqvut9yTaiB/6VSrc1fR3btvdHjWWEz4yx877o7lFTx1zPYAQQJP2JHO75KtPJWnPmjBMAJC3tNzUMeO1USzTSEoWQ5FRtzPoXB7Iei+m30bzyOiBPkOQ6rwbP+AcFYymbmI=
Received: from BY3PR13MB4787.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:357::13) by SJ0PR13MB5404.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:421::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4669.6; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 22:25:24 +0000
Received: from BY3PR13MB4787.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::410d:64ed:3b3a:a6b5]) by BY3PR13MB4787.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::410d:64ed:3b3a:a6b5%7]) with mapi id 15.20.4690.014; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 22:25:24 +0000
From: Haoyu Song <haoyu.song@futurewei.com>
To: Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org>
CC: Alexander Pelov <a@ackl.io>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6lo] Short Hierarchial IPv6 addresses
Thread-Index: AQHXxE2k5RiVL/FvQkSxjPM5MXIYUavZFSzQgCEoJiCAAJpSAIAA6AtQgAAjT4CAAB6GMIABH7+AgABXHhA=
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 22:25:23 +0000
Message-ID: <BY3PR13MB478705606B1A60564D39435F9A939@BY3PR13MB4787.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
References: <b9d172392013f578cdbd8e7120f6154e.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu> <BY3PR13MB47870F8078E156139DE953769ABC9@BY3PR13MB4787.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <16151.1634581572@localhost> <BY3PR13MB4787D81E9B56FBBEA62EA28A9ABC9@BY3PR13MB4787.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <BY3PR13MB4787BBE8A65861E0927E615C9A919@BY3PR13MB4787.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <5CB1DC41-6BB9-4251-A080-207120F0311E@cisco.com> <BY3PR13MB47875C6A873BBA1FDD9F9E9F9A929@BY3PR13MB4787.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CACQW0EovGkJFiiN29Y3yadVQiXLyjHu6jsFJWYvZv+Rwu7JSqg@mail.gmail.com> <BY3PR13MB4787C4DF1D74A7BD79995BD39A939@BY3PR13MB4787.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CABOxzu3nFw1AxCiYv1ao2Dui_JgPrQK6My4xFWjiUm+_fMGOKQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABOxzu3nFw1AxCiYv1ao2Dui_JgPrQK6My4xFWjiUm+_fMGOKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ieee.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ieee.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=futurewei.com;
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 600e7cf1-6c52-48e5-fc5b-08d9a498fd3e
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SJ0PR13MB5404:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SJ0PR13MB540427B6B246C802E1885DA99A939@SJ0PR13MB5404.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BY3PR13MB4787.namprd13.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(366004)(71200400001)(4326008)(8676002)(33656002)(52536014)(8936002)(38070700005)(122000001)(53546011)(66476007)(66446008)(186003)(6916009)(66946007)(44832011)(55016002)(64756008)(86362001)(38100700002)(76116006)(9686003)(316002)(5660300002)(7696005)(2906002)(54906003)(508600001)(6506007)(66556008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: RlTjVtBc6kiOzqcItNmJT2eFm3NHHXfRkrO5HwErDDZItha5wwcjuSSUTxMS3Wmz2DrI39wZCv3S+ztOqHnA/0T3JMQ5FhCY4nWa/4yOVo/UxsT6M9FHEs61nXC0eFq3Smni0E5NsnDJ7BjJhjdzocClLpU78izs0kfWgikKV7dJv8gwtFEzB8mwGR6K4eWPQiSMPLtizfs/W9KfqGHBldNj8o67k0J6oVlwIw5rntID+KvN+8ugJ0SSmW0Vc/cOP2OZsnr6f90Qh+5lYsXbaoMQJbzdS91mtGkv9qnYmhxb01B0yXaMuLrW2oEb1fbnOC0q6oyWGoLckULjsLaI/jjTqOvDIbWq7aM2HbXAHm3ndkTjSuvk/jvW9f8NDxVaXqc5EAJ93qBYhR6wOrr1srG1H5XQdltlvq+HdcsFoHZJBMCVHe3oKYjSVLzLjQRmYE+K/ARREdhDQJ1/e2x/P5PCZ3GvvLodrhgfU+S2gjSTyiTfvi/DvsDVeFwKjDYzDQrD+0JERBjn+YwL/PKikgdnq/PdUMgOPxNCG9faTEeH0qCYh3+N9b2WWl4JqIUvWV8kbcxtEBBsbGJBqIGUiRWjwMrwxLHdeQuznnAClfuMsJTYYMWARTHRTxpKdSIos1lVKLrmL/4dYdrqAwGOrjmDMu/iVF7rl30lp5cXmSrfYuKKXHTc56c1ofi3puFZ33qW9HXk7VVlbjiwxa1q8sr9BMQzDVnvrg/rUzF32LCqHtUWag1NVnI2Hd4ltjWvnc/UlaoTPK2d4iaE2ZnlM6gr/ujL6nkGn/Tj74A1YD5vTLfAntreSo9HCQBJhKRMwuqqRPTBadLPZLiva/7rSZlBwSv3Xri6b8QsarqwM+oi+8zT8Dn441uaOswYohJHvIm2EzjP6+GMb86+SCYBb05bolM5rZsD3RsvuDSVHtWmfVVeb++wUeSjb2lvAEtfap6O2/tY14tRhu6/NhA478FpKS4O6TuNe1m228niobbSAS8e17kAp6ePHbz8Hf2aI4h8VMDURfi2HTFev4lpj6Fq1z+v1d0CYEyIOEH8gpSii8qYaQvDRxNVFQzwHSAhyjzHYRwX/C283ovwkVhYtEov15IunHM7iY5a0ey1fW59Mz9oOssIOEx7HZrsuKvzNLJXYlOZ10rekXXC7fCD8sJvBqyYngVpOZTiVvBu2kmG0wHePqPBOq84p5o40TSUzovpH8HKZxo/wXZtpY54hVRuwHCZzdyblk3ht8oc4iiit8g49MIRj2q+qTE37cxPVGYgpgK3K2JtrYNrlOPJnDvAi6rZHh5pY4j+7e7DncFfIAn/Jq8Ut3145UH048a0FB3jVyjq2/iG48pRdBZjEhGG7nMGWlWzK6uSEC/XOB0MHUzYHncX0O3mwScnrEcwZNn9W36K57G9U5UhIfWpNLHr0mSJaqK9JaFfNydjvOh9U8g++ipdeZQVjl99VCX5FgR1xjbu1F35uB9oAIb9hleT3j87KTzDPdibcfwFoFHiUAtOzAIgBIEULzL8fPUcU3DlDH+9FBPqTyRNMySz7GGEPm5vloGer6WhsePl61VLEWt9gi+/Eg2iAUZnMmOAioHmbEJf2ofNPkM3ieYAwBxvA7ZbZ+5VTu9xdRxOlwTZrGpkJp1sohGdsscqWwW5KXvEuPS5Wxy2fAc5vrsy6G+tCmJEkWK3tpnUCEKQlh4=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY3PR13MB478705606B1A60564D39435F9A939BY3PR13MB4787namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: Futurewei.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BY3PR13MB4787.namprd13.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 600e7cf1-6c52-48e5-fc5b-08d9a498fd3e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Nov 2021 22:25:23.8810 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 0fee8ff2-a3b2-4018-9c75-3a1d5591fedc
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: MOIXdBeGRBUOI7XvxfoWkBLijDFxJ8DiiVWA2pbl8asT0Wt6DFXV3JTgGrHqKcoDBND0hMqErYAC2WJ7x0pPvA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SJ0PR13MB5404
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/0vLuqPvWdsf488Kk-nW9hRBr0oE>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Short Hierarchial IPv6 addresses
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 22:25:37 -0000

Hi Kerry and Alexander,

Thank you very much for the information. It seems the existing standards serve their purpose well. But Kerry did mention an interesting point: both these networks have low data rate and are insensitive to latency. So maybe for the networks or applications where low latency is a critical requirement in addition to the bandwidth efficiency, we could find such context-less scheme more compelling. This is very helpful discussion. Thanks a lot!

Best regards,
Haoyu

From: Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 9:04 AM
To: Haoyu Song <haoyu.song@futurewei.com>
Cc: Alexander Pelov <a@ackl.io>; Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>; int-area@ietf.org; 6lo@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lo] Short Hierarchial IPv6 addresses

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 7:15 PM Haoyu Song <haoyu.song@futurewei.com<mailto:haoyu.song@futurewei.com>> wrote:
Hi Alexander,

Thanks for the clarification! It seems you suggest that the bandwidth efficiency (i.e., the header overhead) is much more important than the cost of storage and processing in wireless. It would be great if we could find some quantitative research results. Is there any such info available?  It’s also good to know that SCHC already supports direct device communications.  How about 6loWPAN? Same?

It is important to note that there are several 6lo data links that employ RFC6282
header compression including RFC8163, which is wired. (Indeed, I believe 6282
is a common denominator of published 6lo RFCs.) So, from my perspective, I'd
like your proposal to show why RFC6282 _won't_ work for your application.

Re: quantitative research results for the comparative energy costs of different
6lo design tradeoffs, I believe these studies do exist and folks in t2trg might be
able to point you to specific papers. Most (all?) 6lo data links are characterized
by low data rates, so it's important to consider the latency win of IPv6 header
compression as an additional consideration.

Regards, Kerry

<snip>