IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] SCHC HC over IEEE 802.15.4: 1. Generic vs IEEE 802.15.4-specific document

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 13 July 2023 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533C4C19E112 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 08:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mT0sLC7WjazT for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 08:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F849C19E110 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 08:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A395F38994; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 11:25:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GR6lFAMOvZ8E; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 11:25:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:40a:34ff:fe10:f571]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEAA738990; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 11:25:23 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1689261923; bh=MZWHtFdP9DnfT53E/5UWqcDNEr1aqOex+KsZCWcTX70=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=jEZijV7RgxPo2/5iQNMLizvkLFTko9bfyBRvfK97iyyYC1lBNcuX2Jm5fYK6H0ML2 Vn0WmedciXdLNQrvyYw8+msVXn09+1yj1T5PuBYvmHgc6zTi3TGLTILTBsP/yZADHH Me3exm9XLcQqgxLGaqobXe0CE97MhEEroBjjkp6XBTcNKylqosTHiPHN4lQ/wBN6K+ XvRwcyhc6QdZG8p/Psx+/9SZI6IdAaizm1V/aYnV2YsJ51xfSWiZ5G7YUR1f1q26EH HRkPQ3calHQJ4ihSpGCnYBsRAAUVFZG+oA/u3TEilM0u6mKD26cckntoWiUf/lS1rx 0+qEtFxITJk/Q==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37594B4; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 11:25:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: carles.gomez@upc.edu, 6lo@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAAUO2xzozvZJEb4wV56Y5F1aK=Yfve5Kudet_Gk0+_c-LnC8gw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAUO2xzozvZJEb4wV56Y5F1aK=Yfve5Kudet_Gk0+_c-LnC8gw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 11:25:23 -0400
Message-ID: <7442.1689261923@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/2D0GmRl5wYZGPXMh_fyfQ7yIDKI>
Subject: Re: [6lo] SCHC HC over IEEE 802.15.4: 1. Generic vs IEEE 802.15.4-specific document
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 15:25:30 -0000

Carles Gomez Montenegro <carles.gomez@upc.edu> wrote:
    > 1. Generic vs IEEE 802.15.4-specific document

...

    > We (authors) followed the current IEEE 802.15.4-specific approach as it
    > seemed more straightforward, and focusing on IEEE 802.15.4 entailed
    > interesting opportunities. Coincidentally, this approach is similar to

Are you writing to enable SCHC over *802.15.4* radios, or any network which
happens to use 6lo compression techniques?  e.g. DECT, G.99, PLC, ??
Do you expect SCHC frames to co-exist with 6lo frames?
(It sounds like it uses 6lo code pages, etc)

    > - The document uses only the SCHC header compression component (i.e.,
    > 6LoWPAN/6lo functionality is used for fragmentation).

    > Thoughts? Would you have any particular preference on this matter?

i think the answer should be driven by input from those who might want to use
this on other media.  What do they want, if anything.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email