Re: [6lo] Initial version of the minutes from 6lo at IETF 113

Dear Chairs and all,

Thanks chairs and minutes takers. Maybe it's fault of my pronunciation, I don't think we discussed any topic about security. If I remembered, in that time we discussed constrained devices and more general case, which one is the typical use cases of APL. Maybe we should correct the following lines a bit.

[11:40] Native Short Address for LLN Expansion (Luigi Iannone ) 15 min

    goes through changes since IETF112
    applicability mostly in static deployment, otherwise, need to renumber.
    next: will try to evaluate gain with this approach; will respond to latest comments.
    then will consider asking for adoption
    Carles: draft states applicability for static deployment of wired technologies. PLC?
    Luigi: some others, will do literature review
    Guangpeng: PLC, also APL (Advanced Physical Layer) which is extension of 802.3cg
>    Carles: other additions needed to the draft?
>    Guangpeng: security
    Peng Liu: support this work

Thanks,
Guangpeng Li

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 6lo <6lo-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Carles Gomez Montenegro
> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2022 4:57 PM
> To: 6lo@ietf.org
> Subject: [6lo] Initial version of the minutes from 6lo at IETF 113
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> The initial version of the minutes from the 6lo session at IETF 113 has been
> published:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/materials/minutes-113-6lo-00.txt
> 
> Many thanks to Dominique, Adnan and Michael for the excellent
> minute-taking!
> 
> Also, many thanks to all participants for the productive session and
> discussions.
> 
> Should you identify anything that might need to be corrected from the
> minutes, please let us know.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Shwetha and Carles
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo