Re: [6lo] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration-16
Pascal Thubert <pascal.thubert@gmail.com> Thu, 21 March 2024 18:01 UTC
Return-Path: <pascal.thubert@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46161C14F701; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mxNrGagAejUh; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x533.google.com (mail-pg1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62C4FC151083; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x533.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5e4f79007ffso862776a12.2; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1711044095; x=1711648895; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4vpGV1hQgFYhj82YUNVsOprCGk1Pd5AwjxhVYzQxfFY=; b=cQCSAABLsoAkbfPIqnGDnTP/P6w7rHKEZIruc/LP/QSj1uz/ovSCgdkYKsX3cipstF UvkWr02sLN58a0d1fj4fjOFMiaFwZ5pVm9renOWzCA5N/wit93gQTIpfmcJr9nSMkEGB BGs247qqU/ep3U+DtrIYFuV/G8X4rW9McQjIKoqLo6kBL26HxC3V6qlbfJQJytY334NI 0JCcI+YoOeMvazMAhHR91debPz6xj38E54Ra1DxyQulSsqXop99rE4l1YFs+uYyLlqYR swfthg3Oa9tOQw7MdJmUvVhHPRma2vyKUcgS4AZTig1CcpFGgT8wx5QnykSuWXYMg1v+ o7vQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711044095; x=1711648895; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=4vpGV1hQgFYhj82YUNVsOprCGk1Pd5AwjxhVYzQxfFY=; b=UMi+2VURIM6RYVA+3jLz9UO8Sgp2oRHEB7nVY+SMkEMs2wY20oJfw+BrWTkX7ofPLS 3EslUg99n7Lf6tVc7fiy+FzRsSIhhByTb+YLGlKHx3VmsV6mss9fUX6GLBgp3KF4nF/a UZtqf3sNh37MvfQRQewckvz0aj5nsd9KAf2p04k2yLcthYohMeR7JvLl5PDq8jgG1tg0 xUPIvSPyGmCQkC6gwLVPm64b6UGoP4EFY0qnuASPI1dXDnXZiJ2chodbhJkpkK39uLfe iOZHVDEV/SpyMYaCSs3wujV9krzZPZT6FQ1W7Iu+P0P/85Ys6OfLkesYh+gLCHfG7ON3 5AEg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU0NOGwJEt8Y+Y1tftgGKn6sSP0C7VlkrQGOoJXqLK8Tt7gnh/WEATPsfHjoI3phoN7CgTUwIeM7NVgDVyQkEe+BzbqbpCHdZNKPtr+0jC9Zsw5o68LqAcXfGVBC3Mu4VZRBe9P8mPziqlzyKY4ltfx7lIWpMPLTIkDPflm8zDyBKqroeE=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxtQ5B6SMXxo8YOzBcxrpD7/zVs8XtP3w1Po+4/B4EqFaS86PSz aI0IBXVld55zK7EKBKps7imZgDwWbokNI+jQ346mKISQ2Xud6Ah2XMmQI3jGnDc1ZI9aXaT1Pxg YIhvd3rkdUfcB35ti/J6Oyjt/dzg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEgmQzlvITEHgI20RaNVQszVgSfqDh+gQN7DSZ8rKyYBmosuTIyMVOuI6mbhZIJ8QsTZqhdGgSKYWFS15nT0c4=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4b84:b0:29c:7536:bdec with SMTP id lr4-20020a17090b4b8400b0029c7536bdecmr108233pjb.34.1711044094602; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <170954095101.37992.864490258274966532@ietfa.amsl.com> <c153c37f-d543-4f00-a433-0122dbcc0609@gmail.com> <CAFgnS4Ui7Sas6hJC31R42Ox=nyrph_-2+56ey+yPjFYoyqHDrw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFgnS4Ui7Sas6hJC31R42Ox=nyrph_-2+56ey+yPjFYoyqHDrw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pascal Thubert <pascal.thubert@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 19:01:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CADPqcJLu7uKGtkoDq8xstWHQdjpuMVCm-XvBMEo283ci=sF44Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, 6lo@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000074367006142f7ff8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/7wuPXEIakXoisFy0cGU3q7Gc_VQ>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration-16
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 18:01:39 -0000
Ack Dan, I'll put some words to that effect. Many thanks! Pascal Le lun. 11 mars 2024 à 21:16, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi Pascal, > > Thank you for your response. This makes sense to me, with one observation. > > > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 3:11 PM Pascal Thubert <pascal.thubert@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> 2. The deployment and backwards compatibility sections are quite good, but is >> there a recommended strategy for updating existing deployments in the field? >> >> This specification introduces a new MoP (14.5. >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration-16#section-14.5>New >> RPL Mode of Operation >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration-16#name-new-rpl-mode-of-operation>) >> . This means that you cannot update a live network. You have to create a >> new instance with MoP 5 and migrate nodes to that instance by allowing them >> to join it. MoPs a re tradictional RPL since RFC 6550, meaning that the >> behavior is already known outside of this specification. >> >> >> With the other hat that I sometimes wear, the one of an OPS-DIR reviewer, > I would say that this needs to be clarified in an Operational > Considerations statement. > > Regards, > > Dan > > -- Pascal
- [6lo] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-m… Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
- Re: [6lo] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6… Pascal Thubert
- Re: [6lo] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6… Dan Romascanu
- Re: [6lo] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6… Pascal Thubert