Re: [6lo] Command frame ITU-T distribution details

[Brian Haberman <[e-mail]>]

On 7/22/15 8:53 AM, Samita Chakrabarti wrote:
> Good Question.
> 
> If we are giving  0x01 - 0x1F  to ITU-T , then   it  does not need to
> be specified in IANA registry specifically and it's within ITU-T's
> administrative use of G.9903 and G.9905 (for future use).
> 
> If we decide to give away only the bits that are specified  for
> protocol use in G.9903 and G.9905 then we would request suggestions
> from Ralph/Scott  for more guidance.
> 

If you recall, I pointed out in the session that the IANA registry is
listed as "Specification Required", which means a designated expert
needs to validate the request for codepoints.  If there is not an ITU-T
spec listing values, you can't hand them out.

Regards,
Brian

> -Samita
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Carsten Bormann
> [mailto:[e-mail]] Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 5:42 AM To:
> Samita Chakrabarti Cc: [e-mail]; Ralph Droms (rdroms)
> ([e-mail]); Thierry LYS ([e-mail]) Subject: Re:
> [6lo] Command frame ITU-T distribution details
> 
> What is the registry going to say for 0x3..0xF?
> 
> Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lo
> mailing list [e-mail] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>