IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] WGLC for draft-ietf-6lo-ethertype-request-00.txt

Samita Chakrabarti <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com> Wed, 20 April 2016 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB4C12EF75 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hUzIF325OxVF for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usplmg21.ericsson.net (usplmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6216B12EF3C for <6lo@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c6180641-f796f6d000000e1e-b8-5717bb760e57
Received: from EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.90]) by usplmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 95.40.03614.77BB7175; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:25:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.90]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:25:52 -0400
From: Samita Chakrabarti <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com>
To: "Ralph Droms (rdroms) (rdroms@cisco.com)" <rdroms@cisco.com>, "paduffy@cisco.com" <paduffy@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: WGLC for draft-ietf-6lo-ethertype-request-00.txt
Thread-Index: AdGbJj3QJaDWXrwYSJa/46k5GaLsfQAAOwrQ
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:25:51 +0000
Message-ID: <ECA43DA70480A3498E43C3471FB2E1F02238F2B1@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.12]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ECA43DA70480A3498E43C3471FB2E1F02238F2B1eusaamb103erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrPLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPlG75bvFwg3vHZSyapwhYXL9UYfFm 6Rx2B2aPKb83snosWfKTKYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugStj+p9XrAWLoive/jvF3sA4I6CLkZND QsBE4sCd06wQtpjEhXvr2boYuTiEBI4ySux6dpMFwlnOKDHj5j12kCo2ASuJjt49YLaIQLbE xXOLmEBsZgFFiVtzethAbGEBe4nPtxcwQtQ4SGzdvRuq3kiiYdt8sDiLgKrEuet/wep5BXwl Zn5cCVbDCHTF91NroGaKS9x6Mp8J4joBiSV7zjND2KISLx//g7paSWLO62vMEPX5Etff32aF mCkocXLmE5YJjMKzkIyahaRsFpIyiLiOxILdn9ggbG2JZQtfM8PYZw48ZkIWX8DIvoqRo7S4 ICc33chwEyMwWo5JsDnuYNzb63mIUYCDUYmHN6FbPFyINbGsuDL3EKMEB7OSCG/ldqAQb0pi ZVVqUX58UWlOavEhRmkOFiVxXu/If2FCAumJJanZqakFqUUwWSYOTqkGxvb/icJXprnManh5 +jDP0/SXfbpvZd7v11m57EaXQ3ZvbUZU0/eO6A21lkd4pVKWTVX1ml37edHsB6KZYboiRcct cu59We54p9b+j2vkVs7PyRGbr7s8zQ0JvSOYJS6dzb0jMUfcMdZj3vObO0rMWz6qXD0sUqzu xlaySYzn3FSXkMLNy8N8lViKMxINtZiLihMBqdonN5ICAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/Hnto5ixFISjOxFyTdsLsAlpYDsg>
Cc: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lo] WGLC for draft-ietf-6lo-ethertype-request-00.txt
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:25:57 -0000

Comments :


'Introduction' section of this draft  indicates a few bullet points on how it might be useful in 802.15.9 and  wifi/Ethernet technologies , but it is not clear to me that if this type is now mandatory for other non-802.15.4  L2 technologies as well.

Can you please add a section on the document on usage with other L2 technologies? Or is this draft only limited to Wifi/Ethernet technologies?

If it applies to other foo L2 technologies, then an explanation is requested  as to when to consider adding this "type" in the solution and whether any existing RFCs( bt-le, lowpanz etc.) require any modification.

Best regards,
-Samita


From: Samita Chakrabarti
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 10:07 AM
To: 6lo@ietf.org
Cc: 6lo-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-6lo-ethertype-request-00.txt

Hello All:


The WG Last Call for the following document starts today.

Please provide your input on improving the document and comments on proceeding towards the next step.

The LC will end on May 4, 2016.



Thank you.

-Samita & Gabriel













>        Title           : Assignment of an Ethertype for IPv6 with LoWPAN Encapsulation
>        Authors         : Ralph Droms
>                          Paul Duffy
>             Filename        : draft-ietf-6lo-ethertype-request-00.txt
>             Pages           : 4
>             Date            : 2016-04-18
>
> Abstract:
>   When carried over layer 2 technologies such as Ethernet, IPv6
>   datagrams using LoWPAN encapsulation as defined in RFC 4944 must be
>   identified so the receiver can correctly interpret the encoded IPv6
>   datagram.  This document requests the assignment of an Ethertype for
>   that purpose.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-ethertype-request/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-ethertype-request-00

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email