IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-05

Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com> Thu, 17 November 2016 01:18 UTC

Return-Path: <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00F11296E3; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:18:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.793
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.793 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XHet-iIAYnIL; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:18:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm3nam03on0120.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.41.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2170712961E; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:18:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=ebmN11SNE0ndLzmfbyA7ghWKgkb+Bm/Gz0cwUgsYcgI=; b=ei0eSrDsBBiQviXrpnTh87leoN1PI7i3ns9dWXMQU2BZS3JRWQrULHadChKNlFVtUQCQGfnr32Covk3dWq3RVlzHP5A8fQo5SosA6vCOSpNCsodAogxFy3YAl9rni9dc9n3E1qCrdV3dce4Z59fZNVwEQb3/zyNRmSnykSpFl9I=
Received: from BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.225.156) by BN1PR03MB070.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.225.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.734.8; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:17:57 +0000
Received: from BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.7.116]) by BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.7.116]) with mapi id 15.01.0721.010; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:17:56 +0000
From: Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, "draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD evaluation: draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-05
Thread-Index: AdJAWYCYthXNUHuJQ5eI6Wc+XC006AAFDhOg
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:17:56 +0000
Message-ID: <BN1PR03MB072210991DBE264EE625D8A95B10@BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF643FFCB09@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF643FFCB09@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:67c:370:128:552a:70e5:ca05:2669]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN1PR03MB070; 7:uBvTS/PEROXCXlpFckpowGvlr9GgqkvPbgz6e0eezoSqF96wz2O2S2JMeTlKhDgBYHvYuRudVQ4Kxe535vhpN2DIN0dJcECHvJbZU24eOMBVVUtl0icjVZpp4F8dWhhYqgyxyEQ+VmewiM/SCWVWzbAf03SzcX/3UTsx0aKfs6klrUgbbW16m+CxZOBzm2+BsI9tUuq/TDdF2gJpmkXUYGcfqXQuZt39kbKzgeTxg2alNpflLQy3RgTT5uW9kdBWcq4BPBKEcVkQDd0ki0ODmNCPrCNu0w4UuDKSu/00/LyEIaSb+PDKtjPkOXgv2b8hJbLWs3CdStjDr9/Ih+We2TF7NnaBaDZ+Zq8SHn0Y3SJLWSRwckS3w+pOvzc3N9Hq
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: da97e6a2-ac19-43f4-0d61-08d40e87901a
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:BN1PR03MB070;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN1PR03MB070D7B3D0718FB823CFA60A95B10@BN1PR03MB070.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(37575265505322);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(102415395)(61425038)(6060326)(6045074)(6040281)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038)(6061324)(6041223)(6046074)(6047074)(6072148); SRVR:BN1PR03MB070; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN1PR03MB070;
x-forefront-prvs: 01294F875B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(199003)(189002)(13464003)(81156014)(5005710100001)(86612001)(81166006)(10290500002)(5890100001)(2501003)(5001770100001)(76576001)(7846002)(102836003)(305945005)(97736004)(74316002)(6116002)(7736002)(8990500004)(87936001)(92566002)(5660300001)(7696004)(2900100001)(2950100002)(3660700001)(122556002)(86362001)(105586002)(230783001)(99286002)(33656002)(106356001)(10090500001)(189998001)(229853002)(3280700002)(2906002)(76176999)(50986999)(99936001)(8936002)(8676002)(4326007)(54356999)(68736007)(9686002)(6506003)(101416001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1PR03MB070; H:BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_BN1PR03MB072210991DBE264EE625D8A95B10BN1PR03MB072namprd_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Nov 2016 01:17:56.5022 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN1PR03MB070
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/JFNYKXAPTEEaqJcED7oyXbCe5KU>
Cc: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lo] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-05
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:18:19 -0000

Great catch, Suresh, thanks!

I've submitted the corrected version (please see attached). I also updated the affiliations for a couple of my co-authors.

Thanks,

Gabriel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 07:34
> To: draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry.all@ietf.org
> Cc: 6lo@ietf.org
> Subject: AD evaluation: draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-05
> 
> Hi authors,
>    I have gone through the draft and I found a minor issue that needs to be
> fixed before I send it forward
> 
> In Section 3, the ESC dispatch byte is described as
> 
> ESC: The left-most byte is the ESC dispatch type containing '0100000'
> 
> The actual byte value is incorrect and should be '01000000'
> 
> Please submit a new rev with the right value and I will progress the document.
> 
> Thanks
> Suresh
--- Begin Message --- 
A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-06.txt
has been successfully submitted by Gabriel Montenegro and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry
Revision:       06
Title:          6lowpan ESC Dispatch Code Points and Guidelines
Document date:  2016-11-16
Group:          6lo
Pages:          9
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-06.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-06
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-06

Abstract:
   RFC4944 defines the ESC dispatch type to allow for additional
   dispatch bytes in the 6lowpan header.  The value of the ESC byte was
   updated by RFC6282, however, its usage was not defined either in
   RFC6282 or in RFC4944.  This document updates RFC4944 and RFC6282 by
   defining the ESC extension byte code points including registration of
   entries for known use cases at the time of writing of this document.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat
--- End Message ---

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status