[6lo] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4944 (4359)

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Thu, 28 May 2015 12:04 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436AA1A9057 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2015 05:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s6Mavx5zlB2l for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2015 05:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DCA01A9059 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2015 05:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4521488129 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2015 05:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brians-mbp.jhuapl.edu (swifi-nat.jhuapl.edu [128.244.87.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD7F71B0001 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2015 05:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5567044A.5080103@innovationslab.net>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 08:04:26 -0400
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
References: <20150507190739.24460180207@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150507190739.24460180207@rfc-editor.org>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20150507190739.24460180207@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UMDai8QRwx8dLO6Eifv5kxpAPr7LvqSTK"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/LerveOPz4DTAAkUBrE2__UzYILI>
Subject: [6lo] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4944 (4359)
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:04:39 -0000

All,
     I would like feedback on this erratum.  It appears to be correct,
in my view.  Any objections to me marking it Verified?

Regards,
Brian


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4944 (4359)
Date: Thu,  7 May 2015 12:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
To: gabriel.montenegro@microsoft.com,
nandakishore.kushalnagar@intel.com, jhui@archrock.com,
dculler@archrock.com, brian@innovationslab.net,
terry.manderson@icann.org, geoff.ietf@mulligan.com, cabo@tzi.org
CC: gabriel.montenegro@microsoft.com, 6lowpan@lists.ietf.org,
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4944,
"Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4 Networks".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4944&eid=4359

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Gabriel Montenegro <gabriel.montenegro@microsoft.com>

Section: 5.1

Original Text
-------------
   ESC:  Specifies that the following header is a single 8-bit field for
      the Dispatch value.  It allows support for Dispatch values larger
      than 127.

Corrected Text
--------------
   ESC:  Specifies that the following header is a single 8-bit field for
      the Dispatch value.  It allows support for Dispatch values larger
      than 63.

Notes
-----
The (non-ESCaped) Dispatch value is a 6-bit selector. However, it used
to be a 7-bit selector, which has a value at most 127. When the field
became a 6-bit selector, this maximum became 63, but the referring text
was never updated.

For historical reference, see an early version from IETF 67 proposing
the Dispatch value within the Dispatch header as a 7-bit field:

http://6lowpan.tzi.org/FrontPage?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=tentative-draft2-ietf-6lowpan-format-07.txt

   The dispatch type is defined by a zero-bit as the first bit.  The
   dispatch type and header is shown here:

                        1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |0|  Dispatch   |  type-specific header
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


   Dispatch               7-bit selector.  Identifies the type of header
                          immediately following the Dispatch type.

The relevant slides also show this (slide 8):
http://6lowpan.tzi.org/FrontPage?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=6lowpan-header-proposal-2.ppt

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC4944 (draft-ietf-6lowpan-format-13)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4
Networks
Publication Date    : September 2007
Author(s)           : G. Montenegro, N. Kushalnagar, J. Hui, D. Culler
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : IPv6 over Low power WPAN
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
E.F.A. Project, and is believed to be clean.

Click here to report this message as spam.
http://efa.daedelus.com/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=97F1D60054.A616F&token=a00583b5361cce8776745f1ea05415c9