Re: [6lo] 转发: New Version Notification for draft-hou-6lo-plc-00.txt

Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 21 March 2017 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FAF712951D for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0r6nJCzRKYFs for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x229.google.com (mail-vk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 974DC127342 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id j64so93623001vkg.3 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+diWyz4jF1VyaRonuedJHr3EPKYl81LxZHV60qvAbcM=; b=h30D/sd6B9IpZq9gHXGl6oStils1NPhMSl08/Lx8kzNAYURPkVY8EOrRws8hDiB3Dw kZgb5NYoot+5Zb2F3v+6Wi9+4UZBK6dgTO9dE5W09o9haTSz/JJsRZ0EUwlpawNhXrXK uT69m77TMf0ufmhkcraGRM6f4cnGEpRCOhYmxM5m6uQjmO3lpm+5jFVtrvGv+Igw5Kw1 1XXq3i+ILrBEfp/NHCmGixrOdnd1JgdqAJ+dwwjjiMiZ2DKfb1deYYSpMts6ejq9aPaT K3gIQX15SY8ZqS4PEXKXM821qS4R0Mrv2DJqO8isvkEQ4wSnYLk4aXMhdl81X0lcxhrc qA5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+diWyz4jF1VyaRonuedJHr3EPKYl81LxZHV60qvAbcM=; b=DD59L3d3IY0IiTlno95UdnIEKCHy3bKyneFR7n/8XS4FwIXVGQlvQuAZuyeOpBbnHZ zuXoTWtttjbD0cKgAioWlexDCllN9g6j3BNWBpDxSQUoPH7WuarI3xp/xlt/+qS3alG0 dzNEAgy/rt0bJyBNh2WHASA4n1QqN3/z2tsPZ/v1DfmlJL0qAWQ351aJ5oPjN/l7OraV 4q7nfiEXKLeY+pNU4hTTjzat6P8rORCenoQt+qZJg21QIR/fT3whMWUlpHt8TnRLrXcy UKU2JLrtT5+Q79cyFtCml3fNCM+QYyjcInKeJ/MiBTCCkY62r3ulxvygrIvtLdIDW4ij nVzQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H20HdGy8bVmJs5bchjMYCaBkr8X2RQWQJ+DscKEMhzzyjLLD6LUfFTLhcWj2TGvRjBjXEERXxmO+B4dpQ==
X-Received: by 10.31.185.73 with SMTP id j70mr5391766vkf.102.1490131251583; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.222.134 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DD0A994E4D6B3F4080662703C8C7C086A0055B@DGGEMM506-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <148937017215.24745.5145016282589745191.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DD0A994E4D6B3F4080662703C8C7C086A0055B@DGGEMM506-MBS.china.huawei.com>
From: Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:20:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKmdBpdS=NeUbSGObybTSiCzJTfBCsaWcZ2TsnTKwk1hh8Ba1Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: houjianqiang <houjianqiang@huawei.com>
Cc: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11439f3ceb6d8b054b4437f9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/OkbLb7o2ztOLKQvDQoJd7yDo_vY>
Subject: Re: [6lo] 转发: New Version Notification for draft-hou-6lo-plc-00.txt
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:20:55 -0000

Hi Jianquiang and co-authors:

I have browsed through the draft and thank you for bringing this work at
IETF.

A few comments and questions:

1) Is it safe to assume that all the nodes in PLC network are line-powered?
2) How does the IPv6 addresses are assigned in the mesh or tree network?
3) In the abstract the document talks about RFC6775, but originally G3-PLC
started using RFC 4861 IPv6-ND, is there a plan to adapt to 6lowpan-nd (RFC
6775)  ARO messages toward the PAN-co-ordinator or LBR ?
4) Section 4.1.3 talks about address mapping for 64-bit MAC address or
16-bit short address and there is one line on possibility of non-MAC
address derived addresses for privacy. Can you please elaborate/recommend
the privacy address procedure based on RFC 8065 ? Also, please indicate
when to use short-addresses and when to use 64bit ID based addresses in PLC
networks (such as local and Internet connectivity)?
5) Section 4.2.6 documents the 6lowpan extension headers and ESC dispatch
type usage. In the appendix or somewhere in the document, please explain
the use of command id and need for the extension in a short paragraph.
Please refer to RFC 8066 in the ESC header byte context and make sure it
follows the guideline described there.
6) Please provide an example of header orders(with diagrams) used in PLC
network from node to the LBR of PLC network. Does it always use Mesh header
along with IPHC?

Thanks,
-Samita



On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:08 PM, houjianqiang <houjianqiang@huawei.com>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> We would like to draw your attention that we have submitted a new draft
> <draft-hou-6lo-plc-00.txt> which describes the transmission of IPv6 packets
> over Power Line Communication (PLC) networks. You can access this draft
> from here:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-hou-6lo-plc-00.txt
>
> Your comments are highly appreciated.
>
> Best regards,
> Jianqiang
>
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
> 发送时间: 2017年3月13日 9:56
> 收件人: houjianqiang <houjianqiang@huawei.com>; Yong-Geun Hong <
> YGHONG@ETRI.RE.KR>; Yong-Geun Hong <yghong@etri.re.kr>; Xiaojun Tang <
> itc@sgepri.sgcc.com.cn>
> 主题: New Version Notification for draft-hou-6lo-plc-00.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-hou-6lo-plc-00.txt has been successfully
> submitted by Jianqiang Hou and posted to the IETF repository.
>
> Name:           draft-hou-6lo-plc
> Revision:       00
> Title:          Transmission of IPv6 Packets over PLC Networks
> Document date:  2017-03-10
> Group:          Individual Submission
> Pages:          17
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hou-6lo-plc-00.
> txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hou-6lo-plc/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hou-6lo-plc-00
>
>
> Abstract:
>    Power Line Communication (PLC), namely using the electric-power lines
>    for indoor and outdoor communications, has been widely applied to
>    support Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI), especially the smart
>    meters for electricity.  With the inherent advantage of existing
>    electricity infrastructure, PLC is expanding deployments all over the
>    world, indicating the potential demand of IPv6 for future
>    applications.  As part of this technology, Narrowband PLC (NBPLC) is
>    focused on the low-bandwidth and low-power scenarios, including
>    current standards such as IEEE 1901.2 and ITU-T G.9903.  This
>    document describes how IPv6 packets are transported over constrained
>    PLC networks.
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
> tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>