IETF Logo Mail Archive

[6lo] 6lo-ap-nd comments

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Fri, 08 April 2016 01:23 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF4912D583 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6iQUoSovbjnQ for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22f.google.com (mail-lf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CC3C12D126 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id j11so68950751lfb.1 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 18:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=aJf6gIqJV9w+R5vk5SMyGWuuLjzMo+tmet/qzE1VDL0=; b=yNKY3S1zoAWhGjtlznad+hYmccQtc7AedzD5nb4g8N7Cu2Y8KH/qqNBTZb0PSP+/5P 5hDR3AqHFsZHtYYb+4qr2Hj8swQbHId9jR6yTBKdEkz7TLluJuGPz6BM+E+0Cgws94It 8TKBKhJpKh9OZJ3vzo4fAyRjEqzrLuwgebct7jt4e8ygNdS6SntXSBHZNqhh2W03U1N7 WgLfm5NgIP/DY3Xr4f1EJdRj2A+ZepaZacPlm7BGrmQFfr86aL8ij2T2lMhX4rIlVnNy F4CttMOszBsBn5lYin9gl97PELhBb4Lq6nWp9WVjsHiT2zb1w/HhXzenUA9kQTi8fRRX qedw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=aJf6gIqJV9w+R5vk5SMyGWuuLjzMo+tmet/qzE1VDL0=; b=iJwX0w6gvGPch6EsfKDAPiShGjxAbEOFCQ/gqAnGzNOUFF+wO/faVvR26dlYnI0Um0 zljmsAZLMPLrQHGuJRKt+bICikt0cehaDxRHUaTf3llbIjzsuA49g+PAfJVNsWgshS+Z rytx7TH/+9jdBZa5epd7/8hat1DYllKr6vOvt5e2llGm7Ow7Zy+PCXMUhg9ZgbvuvTK7 SJYUXmwWoJMSArPyst3+cNOesaiRPQDLTLBd+SElJBe/q26FowgIsmGEuveY5LM+Iv2z JNXFXX9MYXpTHHGoZMvGs8TF22kUxvqXqPx2umjwee30SUdS/Jbp7IJvi9wdHckCCsGg 3zhQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJh0HJUapcTlsmIbE9BZx0v8c9RFARnRZucpFrR8LLZgA3TXY+OXEMWKRf1T6aFJsiOWZnPdKpBx7KsDQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.17.91 with SMTP id g88mr2619557lfi.38.1460078618350; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 18:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.252.135 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 20:23:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAceXvifG76Da0eGbKn=EENuDHuadETJ7rR1B0ZPekEk3gg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Mohit Sethi M <mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/ROV2CvQNf6oIhwZAI_8xbpXlw1I>
Cc: Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: [6lo] 6lo-ap-nd comments
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 01:23:42 -0000

Hi Mohit,

Sorry I could not understand your comment at the mic today.
ND is not secure and securing ND is an issue. While there is SeND, we
need something for 6LowPAN ND or RFC 6775 and 6lo-ap-nd is developed
for this purpose.

Can you clarify your point?

Regards,

Behcet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email