[6lo] Comparison between 6lo and SCHC
Laurent Toutain <laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr> Thu, 07 November 2019 07:56 UTC
Return-Path: <laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3EA120154 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 23:56:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=imt-atlantique.fr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yyTDJG0st8a6 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 23:55:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zproxy110.enst.fr (zproxy110.enst.fr [137.194.2.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A19C1120048 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 23:55:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zproxy110.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F92382109 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 08:55:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from zproxy110.enst.fr ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (zproxy110.enst.fr [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id oizyX5zWBMXk for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 08:55:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zproxy110.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FD88198E for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 08:55:55 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zproxy110.enst.fr 99FD88198E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imt-atlantique.fr; s=50EA75E8-DE22-11E6-A6DE-0662BA474D24; t=1573113355; bh=CZoYcq9mN3saVhEMrpnsn7D7bal5SW1laIxjBhuaRMo=; h=MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:To; b=b7DpiyGEtRIrqB3N2kgwTiZt1Zb2hzfLMlJNuwHB+7R7JUYy2nCc5Ry0PI7yulZ1q HplPewBL3+pLeWK+Pso5ZIkdfTrCXgLm5utmKP6RqXgdl0PbFPlEFe9ss1tzyX1k7P f9LIoUHcWyc3t2uEwdjw5cuW+qZ7byXJvDfRxBIk=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zproxy110.enst.fr
Received: from zproxy110.enst.fr ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (zproxy110.enst.fr [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id NPOIpFnay5Iz for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 08:55:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-yb1-f175.google.com (mail-yb1-f175.google.com [209.85.219.175]) by zproxy110.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51E1582109 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 08:55:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-yb1-f175.google.com with SMTP id v17so618536ybs.3 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 23:55:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX8eOR0Msf1ZxhsgJZZ0VAZwSYq8hTuFQENA+Tg359Dg5I1LUVp lZyfcdQd/sSjTTp2JbfiVyoOFmRZ7Byki9sSzBE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyw/v2UxHtPR1qA2tkc52tsnhA1dGCJ5Mi3zsA0ZYrHseErUn4HUoO+5JEhsjjBt+KYlhe9hNeq+n85BWsXP1I=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:ba01:: with SMTP id t1mr1986449ybg.309.1573113353941; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 23:55:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Laurent Toutain <laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 08:55:17 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CABONVQb7gLHx5OHYdtY_pYQMt+k6-4dSX3Dd52QLWW01oV02rw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABONVQb7gLHx5OHYdtY_pYQMt+k6-4dSX3Dd52QLWW01oV02rw@mail.gmail.com>
To: 6lo@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a738fa0596bcfe05"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/RYtJh0oN29d_7spcjRBDZJu6YIc>
Subject: [6lo] Comparison between 6lo and SCHC
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 07:56:01 -0000
Dear chairs, I've submitted a small draft on a comparison between 6lo and SCHC: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-toutain-6lo-6lo-and-schc-00 Could it be possible to have a slot during the next session to present it? 6lo and SCHC are complementary solutions, and it could be interesting to see if we can establish bridges between them. Thanks, Laurent
- [6lo] Comparison between 6lo and SCHC Laurent Toutain