Re: [6lo] WGLC for draft-ietf-6lo-ghc-03

Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name> Fri, 08 August 2014 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich@herberg.name>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409571B2BB6 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 10:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TaqgHdKIhPYu for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 10:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22f.google.com (mail-vc0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9350F1A045D for <6lo@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 10:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id ik5so8720348vcb.34 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 10:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herberg.name; s=dkim; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Yqx4RQ+aNzeAn2oLM4RF1zSxYi2iHJnMVSHIlXPUsnI=; b=1alh4EsZlelEf3D50qezu4cB3Gg0VBHrmbracwGhNGxjhr9a7eVdBSV/ImuujZlptJ 5qztQTfvuVQprkAxrFuvv9OC50+J7Vgnd8y+RahjIKXFMQ6EMqqOExHrGM6ytz9O2nao EHs43d9Qi2X0pPxrf8pqz8A+sZ+p+jlT701HM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Yqx4RQ+aNzeAn2oLM4RF1zSxYi2iHJnMVSHIlXPUsnI=; b=aeYhPWor5SvH1x/G3BeJqJsAVqy+MTUFdt37XQE/+FjovGFIkznGkalalw6JK1tUF6 kfqk/FLjw+KZl0x98PwEoHS0JdgpjuBYEuct8t7DnALe7xo2ZrTB//UxW7IWIvXGuKM2 Y0CdLEfPPLD3qan1Y0shBuuyED1VV8GPQNExmOxhEQ+KIhgzwVFoUCOGFIC74ATG5ZgI 9ZZOiG7jOkaOPix/eWeOBXjXeaXe+p2KA4Y2TTvL3HCRDMbHPHFsqALMVL0XByRmxE+f vZgl/he/Hr6MFfjaDUDQKUaly4j/wJFChV3y7biFLY99RoLrABovalENFvSbdgWHxwiM 7Irg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkUr2E/59Iv98ksKII0vMXkO9Y9P4hNQhOJ6eAlP/N9exCGhv/XkUaFE2ruZmYqzY/kBVm7
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.234.228 with SMTP id uh4mr7621112vdc.34.1407517326710; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 10:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.70.196 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 10:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAK=bVC9Eb2Mk4+Xvu9b3-tuxX653E=C1pUagXo8CxT-iEzn+9Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK=bVC9Eb2Mk4+Xvu9b3-tuxX653E=C1pUagXo8CxT-iEzn+9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 10:02:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK=bVC_STeyB+fM0e5bogKWV=39JsGZvmzmmLXCJ54gSrgYopg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
To: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/RrXMiu-8aFGNZP80Snf9mLsdkCc
Subject: Re: [6lo] WGLC for draft-ietf-6lo-ghc-03
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 17:02:09 -0000

There have been no objections during the WGLC that ended yesterday. I
will proceed with drafting the write-up and then request publication
within the next few days.

Best regards
Ulrich

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name> wrote:
> This email initiates a two-week WGLC for draft-ietf-6lo-ghc-03. This
> document already went through a WGLC, which resulted in some technical
> changes. Please send comments by August 7.
>
> As Carsten pointed out, the best diff towards the previous revision is:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6lo-ghc-03.txt&url1=draft-ietf-6lo-ghc-01.txt
>
> Thanks
> Ulrich