IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] WG Call for adoption: draft-chairs-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Mon, 09 November 2015 08:50 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F1271B7A5A for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 00:50:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ydL0jMbb5daa for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 00:50:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DEC71A8A78 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 00:50:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1680; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1447059038; x=1448268638; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=S3z5rBs81coAQpr8jYeYZTLvsVXRnCv7w4MKFb09dxU=; b=We/xt3BL4VHq7QOG4pL8H4ymiov+2DVpaFtRGtY2qAxy4ZWvXSdanNza xbleTi3zRwRlnmHMkP8EeFq22IASdBVgDt1xP9z/9pohDUe4WKthOsFa2 11KFZsESGbg/ztK2hDw52chJE0rcRsmHzFVJDqRvsHdJ8aYCup1aFHtVa s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D3AQCaXUBW/5ldJa1egztTbwa+MwENgWEjhW0CHIEUOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqENQEBAQQdBhE6FwQCAQgRBAEBAwIjAwICAjAUAQgIAgQBEgiIJg2vFpAgAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFASBAYVThH6HdYFEBZZIAYUdiAKBYoRAkjiDcQEfAQFChARyhF+BBwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,265,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="205085980"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2015 08:50:37 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tA98obAU011273 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 9 Nov 2015 08:50:37 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 02:50:36 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 02:50:36 -0600
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6lo] WG Call for adoption: draft-chairs-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry
Thread-Index: AQHRF2Rkh5hB517ZJ0aDxbP30zxl3Z6TWLDw
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 08:50:23 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 08:06:49 +0000
Message-ID: <6b94334e86d54a2d87e8fd5e76647fff@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <563AA87E.1000205@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <563AA87E.1000205@innovationslab.net>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.55.22.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/TEdVUZ-rlTppa63Xf-g3mLmCDis>
Subject: Re: [6lo] WG Call for adoption: draft-chairs-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 08:50:40 -0000

I support the adoption. This is long-needed clarification to RFCs 4944 and 6282.

If we move forward, I suggest we discuss:
- cost: Ext requires 2 octets per header. When there are multiple such headers, the mechanism becomes more expensive than the page system.
- applicability: Ext is easy to use for non IETF activities. We can cut it in ranges and hand them out. C/Should we dedicate it for that?
- NALP: indicating that it is currently defined only as the first octet, meaning that non-6lowpan stuff is not expected in the middle of 6lowpan stuff.

Cheers,

Pascal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 6lo [mailto:6lo-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Haberman
> Sent: jeudi 5 novembre 2015 01:53
> To: 6lo@ietf.org
> Subject: [6lo] WG Call for adoption: draft-chairs-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry
> 
> All,
>      This starts a 6lo Working Group adoption call for draft-chairs-6lo-
> dispatch-iana-registry.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chairs-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry/
> 
>      Please send your opinion (for or against) to the mailing list on adopting
> this document as a 6lo WG document. This call will end at 00:00 UTC on
> November 20, 2015.
> 
> Regards,
> Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email