[6lo] Stephen Farrell's Yes on draft-ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations-04: (with COMMENT)

"Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 29 November 2016 14:21 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148042927334.11690.8858697205903703490.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:21:13 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/kC8ODu7kpbsM6669ZnlTV8p8cdA>
Cc: 6lo-chairs@ietf.org, Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com, 6lo@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations@ietf.org
Subject: [6lo] Stephen Farrell's Yes on draft-ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations-04: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations-04: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


intro, 1st bullet: doesn't that same issue arise with
prefixes as well as IIDs? (At least if there are few hosts
per /48 or /56.) It may be worth making that point
somewhere separate from points about IIDs.

[6lo] Stephen Farrell's Yes on draft-ietf-6lo-pri… Stephen Farrell