IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Working Group call for adoption on draft-lijo-6lo-expiration-time

sajjad akbar <sajjad.akr1@gmail.com> Thu, 26 October 2017 23:46 UTC

Return-Path: <sajjad.akr1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0E81389AC; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D9eXAv7bBMx7; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x236.google.com (mail-yw0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89521139F44; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x236.google.com with SMTP id l32so4352873ywh.13; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tH1N2em5O3ZeSccweH4KQOzuMxSs6EDcICabBBN6zp4=; b=FRXlyhwkX5WQbxHVSPzkSF+96Clc6smjHzTDswOEoi5uZMxJWEGixj4NllOS3f88Fq 0f4muBwR+it6xEoyQg5eqIuM172PKr71a/1S9//MY/aN+6k4ZQYGX8p/hl6zLRqy9hct pM4IzwaI913VZoZm/DpwxIV3Gqt/KltdkUWpu2Us7xwNy0wl5MRiQXft6V3TyGZRhb9D +JsEmxQi517G47e+Plm3iv7jstuhfOeR+heQxNYTDhTC/yi8HTayd3URYtHqU5cxc2vU nj5xMPFqHtzVAQfg1nQqk0OCZvtgk6BLM/Ak5vIolfPcdylbkA8KzmNSOG7OSEjSGF6o r8Gw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tH1N2em5O3ZeSccweH4KQOzuMxSs6EDcICabBBN6zp4=; b=YC3fVg7PEQcrqYMZkQsYZEyALG4SMR+x4bVdxGMQld3gxbL2/26OPR5fpX6+q0YSq5 WY9GmVzmC4Lly0a0TbPsSBwpIIskIDs4b0VD9P/NiL7Mux2BTfmORQzZZS/vDjWp4aeu Vca1UvgcshWOjMZwI+5cDnQusob1R8iQzaORAeMYATOIeoxP0M2SJhIQ/a+w7oF16W4D yt6qzVVjUc3CqlxC14HwGVv5f4YaoLs5r/PLpFEzgLhlSwOs7f1G9b/DGdnOpl2jSN/W riyAGzFdF/6uixVD+HmeRHbCpchuNcphKeYKeanlxGtRot8lSZ/079JP0COC6DqVkgqJ vcWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVLrIKhladCIiVrjZomyCIPDHvuu9lCdqOQjgRGfUsVsfPCK4Pc Wmz2jPB7bpbxWQ1EHLQ7RyBD2IGslzgvhhlNAq0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Tu1Diq2mhGQfEiIRAUCF2iQHjayyJzN0zn782gsvVdwGBBO4wz0prS91DvauKHH1GwxEAE8IZVsrQGzWlnaho=
X-Received: by 10.129.169.68 with SMTP id g65mr17057799ywh.134.1509061572859; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.99.86 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E7AAEC603A@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <BY2PR21MB00817D3CC9BBE891BAC14F8595470@BY2PR21MB0081.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E7AAEC603A@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
From: sajjad akbar <sajjad.akr1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:46:12 +0100
Message-ID: <CAByBar_LPH1PDgxpUZ_URpM8pOMci0kmv3oS+N2ihEaNgVH2Wg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Zhangmingui (Martin)" <zhangmingui@huawei.com>
Cc: Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>, Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>, "draft-lijo-6lo-expiration-time@ietf.org" <draft-lijo-6lo-expiration-time@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c146206fe9ef1055c7bc666"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/klNQ_eys6IHtijrdgcmxsy89n5I>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Working Group call for adoption on draft-lijo-6lo-expiration-time
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 23:46:15 -0000

Hi

The work is useful and I support this work to be adopted.

Regards
Sajjad





On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Zhangmingui (Martin) <
zhangmingui@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> I read the draft and found the new 6LoRH Type is useful. Support for
> adoption.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> *From:* 6lo [mailto:6lo-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Gabriel
> Montenegro
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 24, 2017 8:40 AM
> *To:* 6lo@ietf.org; Samita Chakrabarti
> *Cc:* draft-lijo-6lo-expiration-time@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [6lo] Working Group call for adoption on
> draft-lijo-6lo-expiration-time
>
>
>
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> This document has been discussed at face to face meetings as well as on
> the list.
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lijo-6lo-expiration-time/
>
>
>
> There is some reasonable interest and an implementation in OpenWSN. Per
> the last meeting, after a revision we would issue a call for adoption, and
> are pursuing now.
>
>
>
> Please send your opinion (for or against) to the mailing list on adopting
> this document as a 6lo WG document. This call for adoption will end at
> 00:00 UTC on November 6, 2017.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Chairs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email