Re: [6lo] Working Group adoption call for draft-thubert-6lo-rfc6775-update

Hi,
my support to this document, the split was necessary as the BBR draft was
too long with two very differentiated parts.

regards,
Xavi

2016-12-05 16:30 GMT+01:00 Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>:

> As editor I support the adoption ;
>
>
>
> This draft is extracted from a WG document for a better separation of
> roles, updating RFC 6775 vs. new backbone router (6BBR) operations.
>
> There were discussions on the new text about the link model, these are now
> resolved by saying that the link model is not changed but the (positive)
> consequences are better understood.
>
> Also a backward compatibility section was added that was missing in the
> 6BBR WG doc from which this text is extracted.
>
>
>
> This split clarifies greatly the situation for the updates on ND that are
> being done at 6lo with backbone router and AP ND, and componentizes the
> work that is left to be done.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* 6lo [mailto:6lo-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Gabriel
> Montenegro
> *Sent:* samedi 3 décembre 2016 02:02
> *To:* 6lo@ietf.org
> *Cc:* Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
> *Subject:* [6lo] Working Group adoption call for
> draft-thubert-6lo-rfc6775-update
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> Following up on the WG hum for support in Seoul, this starts a 6lo Working
> Group adoption call for draft-thubert-6lo-rfc6775-update-01.
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thubert-6lo-rfc6775-update/
>
>
>
> Please send your opinion (for or against) to the mailing list on adopting
> this document as a 6lo WG document. This call will end at 00:00 UTC on
> December 16, 2016.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Gabriel
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>
>