[6lo] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-dect-ule-08: (with COMMENT)

"Kathleen Moriarty" <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 14 December 2016 03:09 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148168494326.10835.6716748527683497271.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 19:09:03 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/plsxkOBga-CatPyoCyML5go1phY>
Cc: draft-ietf-6lo-dect-ule@ietf.org, 6lo-chairs@ietf.org, samitac.ietf@gmail.com, 6lo@ietf.org
Subject: [6lo] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-dect-ule-08: (with COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6lo-dect-ule-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-dect-ule/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support Alissa's comment on privacy 

The SecDir review didn't get a response as far as I can tell.  Simon had
a question and a nit.  I think the draft is okay on those points, but a
response for the review would be good.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/3E1g-Ccfeq6U0fWcxc5kQ3FL_3w

[6lo] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-i… Kathleen Moriarty
Re: [6lo] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dra… Jens Toftgaard Petersen