Re: [6lo] Sketch of an IPv6-over-Bluetooth4.0 Internet Draft

Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com> Mon, 15 June 2015 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434E91A8977 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 13:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0lJdwRb2DLsA for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 13:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0144.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFCEF1A89A5 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 13:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.225.156) by BN1PR03MB169.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.200.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.190.14; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:28:55 +0000
Received: from BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.225.156) by BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.225.156) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.190.14; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:28:54 +0000
Received: from BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.9.18]) by BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.9.18]) with mapi id 15.01.0190.013; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:28:54 +0000
From: Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6lo] Sketch of an IPv6-over-Bluetooth4.0 Internet Draft
Thread-Index: AQHQpQ8ghT4ZEeTO3U6vehchLT3T5Z2uCMAw
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:28:54 +0000
Message-ID: <BN1PR03MB0728805FC6C4B06D21DC96E95B80@BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <55798F4D.1090100@tzi.org> <5579AA65.2010804@gmail.com> <BN1PR03MB072C8E81F9987B64CD0DFF695BC0@BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <5579C664.2020902@gmail.com> <ECA43DA70480A3498E43C3471FB2E1F01C35DDF1@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <557ACF54.1020206@gmail.com> <557AD6CF.1030701@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <557AD6CF.1030701@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:ed31::2]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN1PR03MB072; 3:0ZDI7fZwGiVzp/7XkDhxyKyDX1wvp+cDlME90a5V3ijy4So5exG33usYL+L3QzUb9TNW6VBB1nnOBY5PpRQ4tXiCTES9YwAS+IpPKSW0EYczUap3yGTwqzdMUxlgUeFsh2OayEJGDipla39o5faivg==; 10:yJHm29+tOie+4rcnkfj4vJc30xZkUOL79nR2J09F0FYgK/vWDPMgs1b5n3YB9hM6YyjthQ7aen5ua0QLPpEKpE+3VOdj1NrcrW6UTKq84WE=; 6:jF3RWkOteG/Umo7iGm0nJHjvjhzzkHTUSjtNE5jAiytQp9qN2nWTUGYa4kV+JDxO
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN1PR03MB072; UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN1PR03MB169;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN1PR03MB072357A7C43902B4A0CF7A395B80@BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401001)(5005006)(520003)(3002001); SRVR:BN1PR03MB072; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN1PR03MB072;
x-forefront-prvs: 0608DEDB67
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(13464003)(69234005)(164054003)(51704005)(2900100001)(2950100001)(102836002)(15975445007)(230783001)(50986999)(74316001)(5001770100001)(54356999)(76576001)(5003600100002)(92566002)(46102003)(2501003)(19580405001)(19580395003)(122556002)(106116001)(40100003)(86612001)(5002640100001)(2656002)(107886002)(77156002)(87936001)(5001960100002)(86362001)(76176999)(62966003)(99286002)(33656002)(189998001)(93886004)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1PR03MB072; H:BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Jun 2015 20:28:54.3997 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN1PR03MB072
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; BN1PR03MB169; 2:SXqyHOsMHWkKZHvpRg3akEXFjbZPoOuDmj+hOAMgU+K7h2Ntrjrs+m3yDKT8qLnE; 2:8HSz4+kzjMG35dZ3ix+2bWar3TamTTMe9TMpukJRh2f336xpfCUvhu1JaYRpKEwdNviYKwJLAeKyMiRaMDDUYoKXaIfwb8YtKPijpdunYY/tNNa/a96WsAN8Fxad0l2qi923Cg+RP1JDQZ3wo3ArsQ==; 9:MhiIlHiIgebapqGpfcz1GPr+u6cgBVWlawXXUjzXD2pBUx31SxXqmDnaEnC1OY4MI2zXyfnFlBVmPnX0wUCIiooOzhl3RzXCtaroOrs5TtOzokJ91jsC8RF6poN+XPCDxECxDDDHa8a6IHHaHLzPKg==
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/tjzbY6zfqf9gW4jxnDwRz1XOpUI>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Sketch of an IPv6-over-Bluetooth4.0 Internet Draft
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:29:04 -0000

According to how you've described this work it would have little (no?) relation to 6lo working group. If so, why would this be the appropriate list to discuss?

Thanks,

Gabriel
Ps - FYI, it is not the case that nobody has tried to develop an IP-over-BT document at the IETF. It was tried a long time ago, and it was the subject of its own BoF. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 6lo [mailto:6lo-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 5:56
> To: 6lo@ietf.org
> Subject: [6lo] Sketch of an IPv6-over-Bluetooth4.0 Internet Draft
> 
> Hello members of group 6lo,
> 
> I propose to write the following Internet Draft.  Would you be
> interested to contribute?
> 
> "IPv6 over Bluetooth 4.0"
> Stds Track
> 
> MTU: the IPv6 ICMPv6 Echo Request packet on Bluetooth4.0 is of size
> 118bytes.
> 
> Frame format: an IPv6 packet over a Bluetooth 4.0 interface is
> containing the following fields:
> 
>    Ethernet II:
>      Destination: IEEE MAC address on 48 bits
>      Source: IEEE MAC address on 48 bits
>      Type: IPv6 (0x86DD)
>    IPv6:
>      Base Header (RFC2460)
>    ICMPv6:
>      RFC443
> 
> Stateless Autoconfiguration: the MAC address is used to form an IID, as
> in RFC2464.
> 
> Link-local addresses: the IPv6 over Bluetooth4.0 link-local address is
> formed by appending fe80::/64 to the IID formed earler.
> 
> Address mapping -- unicast: The Source and Target ll addresses are
> formed from the MAC address.
> 
> Address mapping -- multicast:.
> 
> Security considerations: supports IPsec end-to-end security.
> 
> Referenes: RFC2464.
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo