[6lo] TSV ART early review of draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac
Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Mon, 26 September 2016 21:35 UTC
Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05BC12B2FF; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.215
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.215 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ho6LTsHK0gnK; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BACB12B247; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.184.244] ([128.9.184.244]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u8QLYFiq001343 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
To: 6lo@ietf.org
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <9c8cc2ea-7f35-d6bb-8e48-b9050576eecd@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:34:15 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------71AC71DA188E7628639F720B"
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/z5QcUsPiK-LFTzBXtZlDZOfz3ow>
Cc: draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac.all@ietf.org
Subject: [6lo] TSV ART early review of draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 21:35:40 -0000
Hi, all, I've reviewed this document as part of the Transport Area Review Team's (TSVART) ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors for their information and to allow them to address any issues raised. When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this review together with any other last-call comments they receive. Please always CC tsv-art@ietf.org <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org> if you reply to or forward this review. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac Title: Transmission of IPv6 over MS/TP Networks Reviewer: J. Touch Review Date: Sept 26, 2016 IETF Last Call Date: TBD Summary: The document impacts transport protocols only indirectly through its need to support the minimum required IPv6 MTU. The protocol already supports1280-1500B payloads without fragmentation and uses its own link header. This is sufficient for IPv6 and there should be no new interaction with transports. Major issues: There are no major TSV issues. Minor issues: There are no minor TSV issues. ---