IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] about 6lo-ra-in-ie

Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 14 November 2016 08:31 UTC

Return-Path: <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFBF1296C0; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:31:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uep1TA15gPf9; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:31:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x231.google.com (mail-ua0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDA9B1296D3; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:31:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 12so57447351uas.2; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:31:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hl5uvnwTkP+aUntmyNBVH5JNTj3KIyLG2cKIxGkEbMo=; b=GifqDnZjxqE7A0InCrfL7IW5SGxikMXAtLGgPNsOsk2hzZ88v9zBv/RvoT0k3GQQZi 8bhf4ncQBCa81IEMcr991YZECeVvrn5vbHqEc5nmQaNkff+r0qDQKkpcTef5ibsALGEN Ogk2MIkWbP4fpFSIwPmAUpg4Vl/8bymHr4Onf2C5gGuANlTicRMjI6E95LNGugczdMU0 RkEz94Z4wXFs1eRaOk+y4keUPcYuIea3B8Q3Cq8SXYKjpCi4BOnPSbnVnk6f5cjPSEqr FDfg7FVIi91zHGoVShCrU45iNvwZZfWCB2qlvakQ9xvS8P6vZ+xoD8+KMle6B+xu83qt TQFQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hl5uvnwTkP+aUntmyNBVH5JNTj3KIyLG2cKIxGkEbMo=; b=OCCAgWscQDt3c5uigPuQ8iSGjlTC3fZMUvtgYH3xRLNzlfOgra+WBS61kvvO5JGflf CWqG14c3PBbX0ONQP6K+bm8wTxBt/+KIu39SzU6bZ4mWo96oufofWSifZzdtiOiXCeSC Sybhvc3y9NondIcTmj9aOEm/yJhi3xKVBnrDMHIcWM080MOTu/Gv48CqYzzoc90KWMyY R1FACUXhpwj+7VY6oafOW4Tzcie9+RGY5NJlyScfAK2nGni0zJJnwCUYbamQA5t0QjnB aKqN1YB/8pDNlqFtQO47ZNF0nJ+sQ7izFAXd0mN8i7pi2bXI21XTEmDcBrgZ5fUTX2pT myNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcpYANaAbl/4j2wYKBTm5OHcfjhLjHqi7+COLcsHzzKkFoRirWZpcHusFZ1E4lsBim85hW//2jOIhpnSQ==
X-Received: by 10.176.66.227 with SMTP id j90mr9163741uaj.105.1479112296024; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:31:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.177.197 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:31:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <31816.1478984092@dooku.sandelman.ca>
References: <BN1PR03MB0728AFF8BC45FF37DCC927995BB0@BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <31816.1478984092@dooku.sandelman.ca>
From: Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:31:35 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKmdBpe1H2DdyG+qzrZMYxHjyxJStM6UVKu34LsQaa+znAB6gw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0675e6fcd18d05413eaaa1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/zkJIX9lcEUh7wiXDwdOh6H11FKs>
Cc: 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lo] about 6lo-ra-in-ie
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 08:31:39 -0000

Hi Michael,

Are you proposing that draft-richardson-6lo-ra-in-ie to be discussed and
standardized at 6tisch only?

If this document deals with sending RA over 6loRH, we would like to
understand its relationship with 6lowpan-ND behavior and whether it is
moving away from 6lowpan base requirements.

Thanks,
-Samita




On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> A few weeks ago I posted about draft-ietf-richardson-6lo-ra-in-ie, which
> was
> a method for storing 6loRH compressed Routing Advertisements in 802.15.4
> Information Elements.  The mechanism described would have permitted
> arbitrary
> IPv6 packets to be stored there (it was a general mechanism).
>
> The subsequent discussion in the 6tisch-security design team and with the
> 6tisch chairs was that:
>   1) we would make it very specific to storing Routing Advertisements
> Options
>      only.
>   2) as a result, we can do this work entirely in the 6tisch WG.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email