Re: [6lowapp] Is 6lowap now core?
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 12 March 2010 16:44 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: 6lowapp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowapp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FA43A6BD4 for <6lowapp@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:44:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.564
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.564 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.035, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id efG0OQpzA8CA for <6lowapp@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:44:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B233A6BD6 for <6lowapp@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:34:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-245.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-245.cisco.com [64.101.72.245]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0357B40E14 for <6lowapp@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:34:27 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4B9A6D13.1050207@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:34:27 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 6lowapp@ietf.org
References: <E4DBD8AB11D2E54F89B23D7CD1065D8CD5185B@onzosbs2k3.ONZO.local> <6f60db82b1ecfde34dc6e5b35e72b36a@mailserver13.nebula.fi> <4B981D28.7080408@stpeter.im> <AE18501E-F445-4586-BE7E-66A171F4DA0D@nokia.com> <4B9A5A93.5050104@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4B9A5A93.5050104@stpeter.im>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms060804080908090206080200"
Subject: Re: [6lowapp] Is 6lowap now core?
X-BeenThere: 6lowapp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Application protocols for constrained nodes and networks <6lowapp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowapp>, <mailto:6lowapp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowapp>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowapp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowapp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowapp>, <mailto:6lowapp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:44:55 -0000
On 3/12/10 8:15 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 3/12/10 2:54 AM, Lars Eggert wrote: >> Could we also close this list then? (Ask the secretariat to subscribe everyone to core.) > > I've requested this of the Secretariat. Expect the Secretariat to shut down this list soon and redirect people to the core list... Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- [6lowapp] Is 6lowap now core? Charles Palmer
- Re: [6lowapp] Is 6lowap now core? zach@sensinode.com
- Re: [6lowapp] Is 6lowap now core? Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [6lowapp] Is 6lowap now core? Lars Eggert
- Re: [6lowapp] Is 6lowap now core? Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [6lowapp] Is 6lowap now core? Peter Saint-Andre