Re: [6lowpan] Re: working group status?

I'm working on the answering the proto
(draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding-08) questions.

idnits came up with a few hits so I'm working with Grabriel to fix those
as necessary and I plan to send the publication request today, but
Monday at the latest.  This will be for both the format and problem
statement document.

	geoff

On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 15:38 +0100, Mark Townsley wrote:
> Let's do some calendar work here.
> 
> The last IESG telechat before Prague is March 8. So, I need to schedule 
> the document for review no later than March 1. Also, the documents have 
> to have exited IETF last call before then (2 weeks, assuming no issues 
> to resolve and immediate turnaround by the secretary when I request LC) 
> - that's Feb 15, best case. Also, I would like to have at least a few 
> days, preferably a week, to read over the drafts before issuing last 
> call and to give at least a small bit of wiggle room for the various 
> state changes I listed above - that's Feb 8.
> 
> So, between now and Feb 8 the chairs need to request publication by 
> sending an email to the iesg-secretary@ietf.org along with a completed 
> proto questionnaire (draft-ietf-shim6-proto-07.txt). I haven't seen the 
> publication request yet. If I don't before Feb 8, there will be no IESG 
> review comments to discuss, and no meeting.
> 
> - Mark
> 
> Geoff Mulligan wrote:
> > I agree with Gabriel.  We have 2.5 hours in Prague.  I think that there
> > is continued work for the WG, though we need to recharter to do anything
> > else.  If there are no issues that come back from the IESG (doubtful)
> > then we will use the time to hopefully finalize the rechartering
> > discussion, otherwise we will work on the IESG comments.
> >
> > 	geoff
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 15:38 -0800, gabriel montenegro wrote:
> >   
> >> Well, scheduling (or not) for Prague is orthogonal to progressing
> >> towards IESG (which I think is cool).
> >> Now, given that we have a slot in Prague, I imagine we will be able to
> >> use it to discuss comments
> >> arising from the IESG review. We're not done yet: I fully expect there
> >> will be issues brought up
> >> during IESG discussions. So going now to IESG will give the IESG time
> >> to review and provide comments,
> >> and us the time to prepare to have a meaningful f2f in Prague. 
> >>
> >> -gabriel
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>
> >> To: gabriel montenegro <gabriel_montenegro_2000@yahoo.com>
> >> Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>; Geoff Mulligan
> >> <geoff@mulligan.com>; Schumacher Christian Peter Pii
> >> <schumacher@danfoss.com>; Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>; Jari
> >> Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>; 6lowpan@ietf.org
> >> Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2007 3:31:42 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Re: working group status?
> >>
> >> not cool to me...:-(
> >>
> >> 6lowpan has been scheduled in Prague for 2.5 hours. What issue will be
> >> taken place in there ? Both 6lowpan documents are done well. What next
> >> and working group status ? Closing or rechartering ? At this stage, WG
> >> should shepherd these consideration for further discussion before f2f
> >> meeting.
> >>
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >> On 2/2/07, gabriel montenegro <gabriel_montenegro_2000@yahoo.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>     
> >>> ...and I just saw the response from Geoff.
> >>>
> >>> Cool, thanks!
> >>>
> >>> -gabriel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>> From: gabriel montenegro
> >>> <gabriel_montenegro_2000@yahoo.com>
> >>> To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>; Geoff Mulligan
> >>>       
> >> <geoff@mulligan.com>;
> >>     
> >>> Schumacher Christian Peter Pii <schumacher@danfoss.com>; Mark
> >>>       
> >> Townsley
> >>     
> >>> <townsley@cisco.com>; Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
> >>> Cc: 6lowpan@ietf.org
> >>> Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2007 1:57:38 PM
> >>> Subject: working group status?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Carsten, Geoff,
> >>>
> >>> Could you *PLEASE* respond on this list with some
> >>> indication of what the status is?
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>>
> >>> -gabriel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> 6lowpan mailing list
> >>> 6lowpan@ietf.org
> >>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>       
> >> -- 
> >>
> >>
> >> Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
> >> Mobile Convergence Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>     
> >
> >   

_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
6lowpan@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan