[6lowpan] FW: New Version Notification for draft-thubert-6lowpan-simple-fragment-recovery-06
"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Tue, 30 June 2009 16:50 UTC
Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640303A6CF1 for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.867
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.867 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.732, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AT-VJFl2aK-h for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:50:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7DA3A6BFA for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,317,1243814400"; d="scan'208";a="44025044"
Received: from ams-dkim-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.138]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Jun 2009 16:49:28 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n5UGnSBO018283 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:49:28 +0200
Received: from xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com (xbh-ams-331.cisco.com [144.254.231.71]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5UGnShI015270 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:49:28 GMT
Received: from xmb-ams-337.cisco.com ([144.254.231.82]) by xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:49:28 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:49:23 +0200
Message-ID: <7892795E1A87F04CADFCCF41FADD00FC07B24324@xmb-ams-337.emea.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-thubert-6lowpan-simple-fragment-recovery-06
Thread-Index: Acn5okDGb/3MAthpQv+Vd1BHaoamOAAAAfrw
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jun 2009 16:49:28.0303 (UTC) FILETIME=[BB87D7F0:01C9F9A2]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2374; t=1246380568; x=1247244568; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=pthubert@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Pascal=20Thubert=20(pthubert)=22=20<pthubert@ci sco.com> |Subject:=20FW=3A=20New=20Version=20Notification=20for=20dr aft-thubert-6lowpan-simple-fragment-recovery-06=20 |Sender:=20; bh=9x4XjlEDS32+qORvamZC/fy8lw1LztdOtrKqV/vmH8Q=; b=EOTMUWIDfAhXvoe60CnwvZD8oB5Vc8dNr5kPjGeUeLz1szDSl2LCSXShCj z9L144LsfcPPLAHZXQPtX6vqx52e7//r6raHklF3j+NoQxKbnlsEYgPXQ26S DFUKBSY3QD;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-1; header.From=pthubert@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim1002 verified; );
Subject: [6lowpan] FW: New Version Notification for draft-thubert-6lowpan-simple-fragment-recovery-06
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:50:24 -0000
Hi: The version proposes a compressed fragment Ack. This is still under debate on this ML but the authors thought that I made sense to publish the proposal at least once so it is readily available to all. If the WG decide we can easily fall back to the uncompressed version. We still need to clarify whether the current charter lets us take fragment recovery and flow control as work items though. Pascal -----Original Message----- From: IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto:idsubmission@ietf.org] Sent: mardi 30 juin 2009 18:46 To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) Cc: jhui@archrock.com Subject: New Version Notification for draft-thubert-6lowpan-simple-fragment-recovery-06 A new version of I-D, draft-thubert-6lowpan-simple-fragment-recovery-06.txt has been successfuly submitted by Pascal Thubert and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-thubert-6lowpan-simple-fragment-recovery Revision: 06 Title: LoWPAN simple fragment Recovery Creation_date: 2009-06-30 WG ID: Independent Submission Number_of_pages: 14 Abstract: Considering that the IPv6 minimum MTU is 1280 bytes and that an an 802.15.4 frame can have a payload limited to 74 bytes in the worst case, a packet might end up fragmented into as many as 18 fragments at the 6LoWPAN shim layer. If a single one of those fragments is lost in transmission, all fragments must be resent, further contributing to the congestion that might have caused the initial packet loss. This draft introduces a simple protocol to recover individual fragments that might be lost over multiple hops between 6LoWPAN endpoints. The IETF Secretariat.
- [6lowpan] FW: New Version Notification for draft-… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)