[6lowpan] making progress on fragmentation
Richard Kelsey <richard.kelsey@ember.com> Tue, 18 August 2009 13:00 UTC
Return-Path: <richard.kelsey@ember.com>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035353A68F3 for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 06:00:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JOGoBUPSHUmd for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 06:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EMPIRE.hq.ember.com (mail.ember.com [74.10.175.227]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0213928C15A for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 06:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kelsey-ws.hq.ember.com ([192.168.81.60]) by EMPIRE.hq.ember.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:26:26 -0400
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:26:50 -0400
Message-Id: <87ljlh2tpx.fsf@kelsey-ws.hq.ember.com>
To: 6lowpan@ietf.org
From: Richard Kelsey <richard.kelsey@ember.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Aug 2009 12:26:26.0633 (UTC) FILETIME=[1B29DB90:01CA1FFF]
Subject: [6lowpan] making progress on fragmentation
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:00:58 -0000
I would like to work towards the adoption of Pascal's fragmentation draft (draft-thubert-6lowpan-simple-fragment- recovery) as a working group document. Partly for the reason giving in the draft, that retries are needed to make delivery of large packets reliable, but also because retries are needed to make delivery of *small* packets reliable. With Ember's earlier, non-IP stacks, we have found that customers expect IP-like reliability even from non-IP protocols. We have gotten reliable delivery (as reliable as UDP packets in the Internet, say) on a radio mesh only by repairing routes without dropping data packets. The hard part of route repair is knowing when to do it. The most reliabile way is to use end-to-end ACKs within the mesh. Using NACKs would be more efficient that ACKs, but these are lossy networks and NACKs are even less reliable than data packets, because they only get sent when something is already broken. When a route breaks, we get the following sequence of events: 1. send a packet 2. fail to receive an ACK 3. update the route 4. resend the packet This has allowed us to get end-to-end mesh reliability approaching that expected from IP links. The usual higher-level IP retry mechanisms can take over from there. (Sending fragments multiple hops in a route-over network will require some kind of label switching. That will need to be discussed over in ROLL.) How close are we to consensus on Pascal's draft? What needs to be fixed/improved/removed? -Richard Kelsey
- [6lowpan] making progress on fragmentation Richard Kelsey
- [6lowpan] Call for working group adoption (Re: ma… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [6lowpan] Call for working group adoption (Re… Ralph Droms
- Re: [6lowpan] making progress on fragmentation Carsten Bormann
- Re: [6lowpan] making progress on fragmentation Richard Kelsey
- Re: [6lowpan] making progress on fragmentation Richard Kelsey
- Re: [6lowpan] making progress on fragmentation Carsten Bormann
- Re: [6lowpan] making progress on fragmentation Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6lowpan] Call for working group adoption (Re… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [6lowpan] Call for working group adoption (Re… Richard Kelsey
- Re: [6lowpan] making progress on fragmentation Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6lowpan] making progress on fragmentation Richard Kelsey
- Re: [6lowpan] making progress on fragmentation Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6lowpan] making progress on fragmentation Richard Kelsey
- Re: [6lowpan] making progress on fragmentation Pascal Thubert (pthubert)