Re: [6lowpan] 6lowpan hallway pre-meeting

[Tiago Camilo <[e-mail]>]

Hi,
Unfortunately I wasn’t able to attend the yesterday meeting, did you get to a
consensus, about the discuss list?

Cheers,
Tiago Camilo


Quoting Geoff Mulligan <[e-mail]>:

> We expect it to possible last 1 hour but at a minimum 30 minutes.  We
> can't do it tomorrow night becuase of the social.
> 
> I hope that you can make it.
> 
> 	geoff
> 
> On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 16:21 +0900, Soohong Daniel Park wrote:
> > Carsten
> > 
> > How long do you suppose to have this meeting ?
> > Because of duplicated previous meeting, I'd check it out.
> > 
> > What about tomorrow night ?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
> > Mobile Platform Lab., SAMSUNG Electronics.
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Carsten Bormann" <[e-mail]>
> > To: <[e-mail]>
> > Cc: "Carsten Bormann" <[e-mail]>
> > Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 2:29 AM
> > Subject: [6lowpan] 6lowpan hallway pre-meeting
> > 
> > 
> > > Lowpanners,
> > >
> > > there are 9 drafts that are relevant to this week's meeting at the IETF.
> > >
> > > Two working group drafts:
> > >
> > > draft-ietf-6lowpan-format-00.txt
> > > draft-ietf-6lowpan-problem-00.txt
> > >
> > > Seven independent submissions:
> > >
> > > draft-chakrabarti-lowpan-ipv6-nd-00.txt
> > > draft-chakrabarti-mobopts-lowpan-req-00.txt
> > > draft-daniel-6lowpan-hilow-hierarchical-routing-00.txt
> > > draft-daniel-6lowpan-interoperability-01.txt
> > > draft-daniel-6lowpan-load-adhoc-routing-01.txt
> > > draft-daniel-6lowpan-sslp-00.txt
> > > draft-montenegro-lowpan-aodv-00.txt
> > >
> > > It is pretty clear that we can't cover this ground in the one-hour 
> > > meeting we have on the official agenda.
> > > Since most of the authors and other interested people are here in  Paris,
> 
> > > I'm proposing that we have an off-line meeting
> > >
> > >     Monday, 18:30, at the corner of the terminal room to the right  of
> the 
> > > entrance (where the L-shaped table arrangement is).
> > >
> > > We need to discuss:
> > >
> > > What is the impact of each of the seven independent submissions on  the 
> > > probable course of action?
> > > Is the charter's assumption that we'll finish the encapsulation/ format 
> > > first and then tackle security/routing the right way forward?
> > > Are the additional proposals going to require changes in our current 
> > > standards track document (draft-ietf-6lowpan-format-00.txt)?
> > > What do the authors want to have happen to the additional submissions?
> > >
> > > Of course, no decisions are made in smoke-filled rooms; this is just 
> > > about maximizing use of the face time.
> > > We will summarize the discussion to the list.
> > >
> > > Gruesse, Carsten
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > 6lowpan mailing list
> > > [e-mail]
> > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
> > >
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > 6lowpan mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
> 



_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan