Re: [6lowpan] Use Cases Draft ready as WG document?

"Dominik Kaspar" <dokaspar.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 23 September 2008 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-6lowpan-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6671928C20F; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08C428C20F for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GGHlG3w6uZq3 for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.184]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02FE28C20D for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w1so1837422mue.9 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=6ng81/9pj56FNUrh6eEAAKrkq63bl+++GOPk6S3mQdA=; b=UrZw3GXdfRJOKTmSxNZX5cHJTGn3XTDQHh1/92Q3kaHWO5yW32aTD8AOPdTn1qjvJ4 GwEg3Iou2AeX1fT96QIuAezx+JWrZcXw6Y6Cv8ybKcENE6K6jVLlN0HA9u/5TrF7MmkZ M5PysSqLFXaR5B3jhJ85hWqtnLEovuDZjEZJk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Qb/nuuWOGauZd3axiIzs4VmRNE/ncSpODOtEDw8TSMo/SRm/WnHAEDdFeYlbLu9kg2 VYmTxX5GhHH6rTzS10EOjipkv8WBH6H5y78LYRLFFkQ7mvdn7G6Q68jwHm1wKtBG3kZx 49jEqzfCS/ku5HV0id6K17Z4D8N73rgKpEmU4=
Received: by 10.180.223.8 with SMTP id v8mr3990462bkg.53.1222188978883; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.181.31.16 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2a3692de0809230956k6f5f8386k601a98c5bf1bdd21@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:56:18 +0200
From: Dominik Kaspar <dokaspar.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Geoff Mulligan <geoff@mulligan.com>
In-Reply-To: <99e1f5cb0809222202s1dd7ca36n7353a1bbda2353c6@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <99e1f5cb0809212052x66487ec4rf8f5b628fb3b2c10@mail.gmail.com> <C4FD5754.52550%jvasseur@cisco.com> <99e1f5cb0809222202s1dd7ca36n7353a1bbda2353c6@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: 6lowpan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Use Cases Draft ready as WG document?
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Geoff,

As you mentioned, the Use Cases document has been stable for quite
some time, and it has sparked a lot of interest.
I am therefore "in favor of" Working Group adoption.

Greetings,
Dominik

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Geoff Mulligan <geoff@mulligan.com> wrote:
> JP,
>   That was a mistake.  I followed it up with a message to the list asking
> for responses on whether the document should become a WG doc.
>
> Please folks on the 6lowpan list respond and let us know if you think the
> Use Case document is ready to become a WG draft.
>
>       geoff
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:08 AM, JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Geoff,
>>
>> In another email you wrote:
>>
>> "
>> Jonathan please submit your draft draft-hui-6lowpan-hc-01
>> Eunsook please also submit your draft draft-ekim-6lowpan-scenarios-03"
>>
>> Is the second ID adopted as a WG (since below you asked for feed-back) ?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> JP.
>>
>> On 9/22/08 5:52 AM, "Geoff Mulligan" <geoff@mulligan.com> wrote:
>>
>> The document draft-ekim-6lowpan-scenarios-03 has been stable for some
>> time now and this is a chartered item.
>>
>> Are you "in favor of" or "opposed to" adopting
>> draft-ekim-6lowpan-scenarios-03
>> (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ekim-6lowpan-scenarios-03.txt)
>> as a 6lowpan Working Group Document?
>>
>>         Thanks,
>>                 geoff
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> _______________________________________________
>> 6lowpan mailing list
>> 6lowpan@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> 6lowpan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>
>
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
6lowpan@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan