Re: [6lowpan] hc-01
"Julien Abeille (jabeille)" <jabeille@cisco.com> Thu, 09 October 2008 12:45 UTC
Return-Path: <6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-6lowpan-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E243A692B; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 05:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B933A68C3 for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 05:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.288, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5twgiATkYPV0 for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 05:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596443A68F9 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 05:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,382,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="22096542"
Received: from ams-dkim-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.138]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Oct 2008 12:45:36 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m99CjaMb006133; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:45:36 +0200
Received: from xbh-ams-332.emea.cisco.com (xbh-ams-332.cisco.com [144.254.231.87]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m99Cjaa5005621; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:45:36 GMT
Received: from xmb-ams-33d.emea.cisco.com ([144.254.231.92]) by xbh-ams-332.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:45:36 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:45:29 +0200
Message-ID: <38F26F36EAA981478A49D1F37F474A86020D05FC@xmb-ams-33d.emea.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <179B90FC-33BF-4FF1-908C-9B539E6AE82A@archrock.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: hc-01
Thread-Index: AckpoIywmdeEPdl6SZiMY2WljdNRlwAZoGrg
References: <38F26F36EAA981478A49D1F37F474A86020D01F8@xmb-ams-33d.emea.cisco.com> <7892795E1A87F04CADFCCF41FADD00FC06577440@xmb-ams-337.emea.cisco.com> <179B90FC-33BF-4FF1-908C-9B539E6AE82A@archrock.com>
From: "Julien Abeille (jabeille)" <jabeille@cisco.com>
To: Jonathan Hui <jhui@archrock.com>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Oct 2008 12:45:36.0507 (UTC) FILETIME=[ED3EF4B0:01C92A0C]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=9919; t=1223556336; x=1224420336; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jabeille@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Julien=20Abeille=20(jabeille)=22=20<jabeille@ci sco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20hc-01 |Sender:=20; bh=yxLQupqLntDzY8SLxpSNQAj5oFsJpnSEUTt/2VYP+ko=; b=qacsErZDbYOEuHxQy6H7Eb06bk2q1KHVsUOy8o3vRRdKGeAeO6bAUM6mV0 YQ2t7aNGsTMc9hgUNZ7y7sujbMZxkT44pQrm37oukHn54dMy2x2KKXt7s6LX TScsLfd8ku;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-1; header.From=jabeille@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim1002 verified; );
Cc: 6lowpan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] hc-01
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Pascal, Jonathan, For addresses I see an issue with a few scenarios: - dest multicast, source global non compressable (SAM does not define 128 bits format) - some dest multicast are not in either of the 4 DAM cases, e.g FF3E:0040:aaaa:a:a:a:1:1 (address based on prefix aaaa:a:a:a::/64, with 32 bit group id = 1:1) Pascal, can you clarify the DDF = 01 case I tried to make my ideas clear by listing all current multicast scenarios , based on http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-multicast-addresses and RFC 3306 + 3956 (unicast prefix based multicast addresses) A 128, not compressed B FF02::XX 1 byte needed C FF0X::00XX:XXXX 4 bytes needed D FF0X::00XX:XXXX:XXXX 6 bytes needed E unicast prefix based address, not embedding rendez vous point: 5 bytes needed F unicast prefix based address, embedding rendez vous point: 6 bytes needed A covers unicast prefix based multicast addresses with prefix not in context B covers most useful link local cases (see IANA) e.g. LL all nodes, FF02::1 C covers longer well known cases (see IANA) e.g. all-dhcp-servers FF05::1:3 D covers solicited node and node information queries FF02::1:FFXX:XXXX and FF02::2:FFXX:XXXX E covers format defined in RFC3306, when the prefix used is in the default context. | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 64 | 32 | +--------+----+----+--------+----+----------------+----------+ |11111111|flgs|scop|reserved|plen| network prefix | group ID | +--------+----+----+--------+----+----------------+----------+ Here flags are 0011 (e.g. not embedding rendez vous point, unicast prefix based, non permanently assigned) We only need to send flags, scope, group ID (5 bytes) F covers format defined in RFC3956, when the prefix used is in the default context. | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 64 | 32 | +--------+----+----+----+----+----+----------------+----------+ |11111111|flgs|scop|rsvd|RIID|plen| network prefix | group ID | +--------+----+----+----+----+----+----------------+----------+ Here flags are 0111 (e.g. embedding rendez vous point, unicast prefix based, non permanently assigned) We only need flags, scope, reserved + RIID, group ID (6bytes) Questions: - do we want to support all this? - do we want to group some cases: we could group C and D, E and F, then we have 4 cases only - what do we do for dest multicast, source non compressable. - Do we keep unspecified support? - do we afford one more bit (this would be 7 bits for addresses) and use dispatch e.g. 1101xxxx? - do we keep src and dest encoding linked. For now we have 2 bits common to src and dest (DDF), plus SAM and DAM. This makes 16 cases for both src and dest, 32 in total. Cheers, Julien -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Hui [mailto:jhui@archrock.com] Sent: jeudi 9 octobre 2008 01:50 To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) Cc: Julien Abeille (jabeille); 6lowpan@ietf.org Subject: Re: hc-01 Hi Pascal, I think this looks great. It covers the cases we care about (unicast and multicast) without using any extra bits that my initial proposal. The small thing I would change is moving the "DDF" field to bits 10-11 (shifting TF and NH 2 bits to the left). Then TF would not span a byte boundary. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | TF |NH | HLIM | DDF | SAM | DAM | +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ -- Jonathan Hui On Oct 8, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote: > Hi Julien: > > I think you're right, we need to dig a little bit more. > > So starting from Jonathan's encoding, maybe we can refine was was CTX > > > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 > +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ > | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | DDF | TF |NH | HLIM | SAM | DAM | > +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ > > - Dispatch: 8-15 > - DDF: Destination dependant fiels > - 00: Destination is global (or ULA), no context byte after the HC > field > - 01: Destination is global (or ULA), one byte context byte after the > HC field > - 10: Destination is Link local > - 11: Destination is multicast scoped address > > - TF: Traffic Class, Flow Label > - 00: 4-bit Pad + Traffic Class + Flow Label (4 bytes) > - 01: ECN + 2-bit Pad + Flow Label (3 bytes) > - 10: Traffic Class (1 byte) > - 11: No Traffic Class and Flow Label > > - NH: Next Header compression > > - HLIM: Hop Limit > - 00: uncompressed > - 01: 1 > - 10: 64 > - 11: 255 > > When destination is link local: > ------------------------------- > prefix is FC80::/64 when compressed > > - SAM: Source Address Mode - prefix is link-local, when compressed > - 00: 128 bits > - 01: 64 bits > - 10: 16 bits > - 11: 0 bits > - DAM: Destination Address Mode - prefix is link-local, when > compressed > - 00: 128 bits > - 01: 64 bits > - 10: 16 bits > - 11: 0 bits > > When destination is multicast: > ------------------------------- > prefix is FF02::/64 when compressed > > - SAM: Source Address Mode > - 00: 0 bits, unspecified address > - 01: 64 bits, prefix is link local > - 10: 16 bits, prefix is link local > - 11: 0 bits, derived from the IID, prefix is link local > - DAM: Destination Address Mode - prefix is link-local, when > compressed > - 00: 8 bits, prefix is compressed, suffix is 7 octets of zeroes, > then this octet > - 01: 24 bits, prefix is compressed, suffix is 4 octets of zeroes, > then one octet 0xFF then this octet > - 10: 16 bits. 4 bits flags, 4 bits scope, 1 byte suffix. > Prefix as defined in RFC 4291, suffix is 7 octets of zeroes, then this > suffix octet > - 11: 24 bits 4 bits flags, 4 bits scope, 2 bytes suffix Prefix as > defined in RFC 4291, suffix is 6 octets of zeroes, then those suffix > octets > > When destination is ULA or global: > ------------------------------- > The prefix is found from the context table. > If there is no context octet after the HC field then this is the > default prefix. > > - SAM: Source Address Mode > - 00: 128 bits > - 01: 64 bits > - 10: 16 bits > - 11: 0 bits > - DAM: Destination Address Mode > - 00: 128 bits > - 01: 64 bits > - 10: 16 bits > - 11: 0 bits > > Notes: > > With this change, the 16 bits format of Link local and ULA and global > really means the last 16 bits ( apposed to 15 in > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-00 > 2.2. IPv6 Unicast Address Compression. > > With this change, we have the most useful mcast cases covered: > DAM of 00 compresses FF02::XX, so you get all routers on link, etc... > DAM of 01 compresses FF02::FFXX:YYZZ, sollicited node mcast address > DAM of 10 and 11 compress all permanently-assigned multicast addresses > defined today for all scopes > > What do you think? > > Pascal > ________________________________________ > From: Julien Abeille (jabeille) > Sent: mercredi 8 octobre 2008 17:51 > To: Jonathan Hui > Cc: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) > Subject: hc-01 > > Hi Jonathan, > > I send unicast because my thought will not be clear, and to make a > quick presentation and bind it to "cisco sensor team". > I did my master thesis in 2005 at Cisco in Sophia Antipolis. My > project manager was Patrick Wetterwald (IPSO president) and I worked > with Pascal on tree discovery and bubbles protocols. I joined Cisco as > employee in july last year, and have been working on sensors with > Patrick as project manager, Pascal and a few others as engineers. I > met JP Vasseur a year ago and we have frequent calls and meetings, as > he recently moved 150km from switzerland where my office is. I work > most closely with Mathilde Durvy whom you met for IPSO interop calls. > > after discussion with Pascal about address compression, I try to > clarify my thoughts: > - 64 last bits compression in unicast address compression is only > feasible if last 64 bits are based on IID (either 64 bit MAC address > or PAN ID+0+16bit address). I thought it would be nice to be able to > compress as well addresses with bytes 8 to 13 = 0. (e.g. a::1) > - could be nice as well to compress the IID only when the prefix is > not compressable? > - for multicast address compression, i thought stateless compression > could be nice. This works well with permanently assigned addresses > (Pascal, the link i promissed: > http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-multicast-addresses) > , as many bytes are 0 after the two first ones > - for multicast again, it would be nice to be able to compress > addresses with more than 9-bit non 0 (a few permanently assigned ones > apply there, like all-dhcp-agents) > - regarding the 16-bit compressed format, i would prefer not having > one bit or more in the compressed field with a special meaning (first > bit 0 = unicast, 3 first bits 101 = multicast), but keep all these > bits in the encoding > - I was wondering if assuming flags are 0 cannot be an issue. > > These are just thoughts, as i am not extremely clear on the important > scenarios where we want to compress (e.g. solicited node multicast > compression might not be needed as with ND optimizations, there will > not be many NS), and am not clear either about multicast addresses > except permanently assigned ones. More preciely i do not know if we > want to support unicast prefix based multicast addresses or rendez > vous point addresses, and what they look like. > > hope this helps in the discussion, > regards, > Julien > _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list 6lowpan@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
- Re: [6lowpan] hc-01 Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6lowpan] hc-01 Jonathan Hui
- Re: [6lowpan] hc-01 Julien Abeille (jabeille)
- Re: [6lowpan] hc-01 Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6lowpan] hc-01 Jonathan Hui
- Re: [6lowpan] hc-01 Jonathan Hui
- Re: [6lowpan] hc-01 Pascal Thubert (pthubert)