Re: [6lowpan] HC-01 ready to advance to WG document?
"Chol Su Kang" <ckang@dustnetworks.com> Wed, 27 August 2008 17:24 UTC
Return-Path: <6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-6lowpan-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F33D3A681F; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4AB3A681D for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.086
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HOST_EQ_STATIC=1.172, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yRljBS+dnK4m for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.dustnetworks.com (cust-67-203-88-34.static.o1.com [67.203.88.34]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F55D3A635F for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:22:31 -0700
Message-ID: <16745BFFDEC5F64BBB094C931862B4951FE89D@dust-exch-01.dusthq.dust-inc.com>
In-Reply-To: <7892795E1A87F04CADFCCF41FADD00FC0625E93D@xmb-ams-337.emea.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [6lowpan] HC-01 ready to advance to WG document?
Thread-Index: AcjzLowi+0W+3Re8Tuq3ecNsa0EQEgUN2iMgAEAHMYA=
From: Chol Su Kang <ckang@dustnetworks.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: 6lowpan <6lowpan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] HC-01 ready to advance to WG document?
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org
Here are my comments on draft-hui-6lowpan-hc-01.txt. Figure 1. LOWPAN_IPHC is shown as 1 octet. But the text describes it is a two-octets field. Figure 1. It shows "Uncompressed fields follow" after LOWPAN_IPHC. But, Figure 5 shows differently. Sec 2.1 pg 5 "Next Hop" for NH bit? Next Hop and Next Header usages are confusing. Sec 2.1 pg 5 SAC(?) for Source Address Mode Sec 2.2 pg 6 Is this ID requiring upper-layer integrity checks? Are such checks used to detect out of sync, or prevent out of sync? Can you provide a reference for pseudo-header checksum? What is the reason for limiting the uni-cast address range to 15-bit range? Sec 2.3 pg 8 What is "well-known mapping"? Is it referring well-known multicast addresses? Sec 2.4 Is this intended Range order, i.e. Range 0, 2, 1, 3, 4? Sec 3 Figure 5: "In-line IP Fields"? Is this "In-line IPv6 header fields"? Sec 4 It states that another short address range is reserved in this document. However, Sec 2.4 shows the reservation/usage of three additional ranges. -----Original Message----- From: 6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pascal Thubert (pthubert) Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 3:30 AM To: Carsten Bormann Cc: 6lowpan Subject: Re: [6lowpan] HC-01 ready to advance to WG document? Hi Carsten: Resending your call. There were a number of votes in favor, so I suggest that those against should speak now or forever hold their peace. Pascal >-----Original Message----- >From: 6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carsten Bormann >Sent: jeudi 31 juillet 2008 18:56 >To: 6lowpan >Cc: Carsten Bormann >Subject: [6lowpan] HC-01 ready to advance to WG document? > >Lowpanners, > >we were so pressed for time at the WG meeting that the chairs forgot >to ask "the question": > >Do we believe that draft-hui-6lowpan-hc-01.txt is now ready to become >the WG document for charter item 2, "6LoWPAN Improved Header >Compression"? > >Note that moving the document to WG document status does not mean we >have to agree with every detail in there. >We just need to agree that it is a good basis for the remaining work. >(Moving to WG document status also means that all further changes >should be the result of work in the WG, so it also removes a little >flexibility that the authors of an individual draft have.) >I believe there was tacit agreement in the room in Dublin, and I now >want to make the agreement explicit on the mailing list. > >As the document has been pretty non-contentious, I'm looking forward >to comments until Monday 1800 UTC. >If there are no objections by this time, I'll ask Jonathan to resubmit >the draft as a WG document (possibly with the changes resulting from >this meeting). > >Gruesse, Carsten > >_______________________________________________ >6lowpan mailing list >6lowpan@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list 6lowpan@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list 6lowpan@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
- [6lowpan] HC-01 ready to advance to WG document? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [6lowpan] HC-01 ready to advance to WG docume… JP Vasseur
- Re: [6lowpan] HC-01 ready to advance to WG docume… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6lowpan] HC-01 ready to advance to WG docume… Philip Levis
- Re: [6lowpan] HC-01 ready to advance to WG docume… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6lowpan] HC-01 ready to advance to WG docume… Chol Su Kang
- Re: [6lowpan] HC-01 ready to advance to WG docume… Jonathan Hui
- Re: [6lowpan] HC-01 ready to advance to WG docume… Laurent Toutain