IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [6lowpan] 00 version of Goals and Assumptions submitted

Soohong Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com> Tue, 15 February 2005 10:52 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA16840; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 05:52:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D10f6-0000z7-EP; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:14:36 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D10Ih-00029i-Ls; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 05:51:27 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D10GC-0001cu-IK for 6lowpan@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 05:48:52 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA16548 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 05:48:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D10bA-0000sy-26 for 6lowpan@ietf.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:10:36 -0500
Received: from custom-daemon.mailout3.samsung.com by mailout3.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) id <0IBY00H018OFEL@mailout3.samsung.com> for 6lowpan@ietf.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:48:15 +0900 (KST)
Received: from ep_mmp2 (mailout3.samsung.com [203.254.224.33]) by mailout3.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IBY00HMS8OFKH@mailout3.samsung.com> for 6lowpan@ietf.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:48:15 +0900 (KST)
Received: from LocalHost ([168.219.198.109]) by mmp2.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) with ESMTPA id <0IBY004H68OFSI@mmp2.samsung.com> for 6lowpan@ietf.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:48:15 +0900 (KST)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:50:27 +0900
From: Soohong Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [6lowpan] 00 version of Goals and Assumptions submitted
In-reply-to: <42114136.9020805@sun.com>
To: gabriel montenegro <gab@sun.com>, 6lowpan@ietf.org
Message-id: <EDELKJDGPGNIPOAOHMNPAEICHBAA.soohong.park@SAMSUNG.COM>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 41c17b4b16d1eedaa8395c26e9a251c4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: 6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 25620135586de10c627e3628c432b04a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Nandakishore and Gabriel

Overall looks good for me and several comments are as below;

1. similar words make an unnecessary confusion, for example
LoWPAN, LoWPANs, LoWPAN network and LoWPAN networks
I guess all above term mentions the same meaning through this
document. Personally, LoWPAN is so preferable.

2. Prior to addressing the section 4.1, the related assumption
should be indicated in the section 3. For example,

Devices within LoWPAN have a IP function to discover, control,
manage and communicate with each other. Further, IPv6 is 
considered in this document to support the unique address to 
the large number of devices.

3. Regarding the section 4.2, I am not sure why topologies
including mesh and star of IEEE 802.15.4 is a problematic.

4. In section 6
Instead of TBD, I'd propose below mention simply,

No IANA considerations are required in this document.


Thanks.

     Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
     Mobile Platform Lab. Samsung Electronics.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 6lowpan-bounces@lists.ietf.org 
> [mailto:6lowpan-bounces@lists.ietf.org]On Behalf Of gabriel montenegro
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 9:24 AM
> To: 6lowpan@ietf.org
> Subject: [6lowpan] 00 version of Goals and Assumptions submitted
> 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> We've submitted the first *official* version of this draft 
> (previous ones had circulated
> on the alias, though).
> 
> The draft is available in anticipation of it appearing at the IETF
> repository in either html or txt formats:
> 
> 	draft-kushalnagar-lowpan-goals-assumptions-00.txt
> 	draft-kushalnagar-lowpan-goals-assumptions-00.html
> 
> To fetch it, please go here:
> 
> 	http://f2.pg.briefcase.yahoo.com/gabriel_montenegro_2000
> 
> [it's in the "lowpan" directory]
> 
> tnx,
> 
> -gabriel
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> 6lowpan@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
6lowpan@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email