Re: [6lowpan] #77: Improve relation to R01
"6lowpan issue tracker" <trac@tools.ietf.org> Tue, 27 July 2010 13:52 UTC
Return-Path: <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85443A6994 for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.576
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N+epIeyE7RbA for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2a]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E181C3A6B90 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <trac@tools.ietf.org>) id 1OdkaU-0004XT-Ac; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:52:54 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: 6lowpan issue tracker <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.11.7
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.11.7, by Edgewall Software
To: cabo@tzi.org
X-Trac-Project: 6lowpan
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:52:54 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/6lowpan/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/6lowpan/trac/ticket/77#comment:1
Message-ID: <074.58d1b4c862d299ac2bc9c007e388b00c@tools.ietf.org>
References: <065.f34edb65ffd36dd97b36aaac710125ad@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 77
In-Reply-To: <065.f34edb65ffd36dd97b36aaac710125ad@tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: cabo@tzi.org, 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: 6lowpan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] #77: Improve relation to R01
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Reply-To: 6lowpan@ietf.org
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:52:46 -0000
#77: Improve relation to R01
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: dokaspar.ietf@… | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: routing-requirements | Version:
Severity: Active WG Document | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Changes (by cabo@…):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Old description:
> R01: The requirement of making routing state number and size independent
> of the number of hosts is perfectly valid; however, the goal toward
> "routing protocol of low computational complexity in time and resources"
> combined with R10 "scalability in terms of number of reachable end-
> points" shall be better taken into account when specifying requirements
> such as R04, R05, R06, and R09.
New description:
R01: The requirement of making routing state number and size independent
of the number of hosts is perfectly valid; however, the goal toward
"routing protocol of low computational complexity in time and resources"
combined with R10 "scalability in terms of number of reachable end-points"
shall be better taken into account when specifying requirements such as
R04, R05, R06, and R09.
(From Routing Directorate Review of draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-
requirements-06.txt, May 20, 2010)
--
Comment:
In -07, we are calling out the tradeoffs more explicitly in R05, R06, R09
(SVN-195).
(However, the text probably would become unreadable if we actually
mentioned every tradeoff in every place.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/6lowpan/trac/ticket/77#comment:1>
6lowpan <http://tools.ietf.org/6lowpan/>
- [6lowpan] #77: Improve relation to R01 6lowpan issue tracker
- Re: [6lowpan] #77: Improve relation to R01 6lowpan issue tracker