Re: [6tisch-security] meeting times

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Wed, 17 January 2018 08:12 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: 6tisch-security@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch-security@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83B712F3D3 for <6tisch-security@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:12:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0WgxWcBaJuXa for <6tisch-security@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:12:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud9.xs4all.net (lb3-smtp-cloud9.xs4all.net [194.109.24.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA0B3124234 for <6tisch-security@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:12:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([IPv6:2001:888:0:22:194:109:20:199]) by smtp-cloud9.xs4all.net with ESMTPA id bipxeyrDW6VzTbipxeQSqy; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:12:47 +0100
Received: from AMontpellier-654-1-233-55.w92-145.abo.wanadoo.fr ([92.145.176.55]) by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:12:45 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:12:45 +0100
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: 6tisch-security@ietf.org, "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com>, sandeep kumar <sandeep.kumar@philips.com>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <16387.1516137308@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
References: <ec0dc702a4cb72aeba948c2284736f82@xs4all.nl> <499916683ba341268848f31b46ce2e3f@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com> <22011.1511821577@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <c64f69f2bebe906e196e08e466f13e6f@xs4all.nl> <40fd399ef8264e3ebe1cba74c5af6bac@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com> <b7b1bc59ed9de89f0c6cc523925cde71@xs4all.nl> <07de0548d9954c2df2b6ad1a247785b1@xs4all.nl> <23861.1511974106@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <e99d662cd20cba53846877a56b9e4c7f@xs4all.nl> <13418.1512586584@dooku.sandelman.ca> <ca8c00d9fea462d6e057b951e261e775@xs4all.nl> <24079.1515518266@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <36205600728426ff473158f58cffcc35@xs4all.nl> <16387.1516137308@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID: <952ea900c9f815996601298f9e32a8e2@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfHqhyiT6UWP+ZjEUUMdWAp+m8ZTqfkjf9RD+T1VXComZo88VsqZJEc/UDZJABtgpMCMoZ90On0UFy67PET6+BL0r9TU5rwcTxeGX50jkrlDFaFgzwgx9 jrXr+CRBWoZycBYAaMHSmwUDcy5ToLbs0xO460ZMsXD4ij4+B+s5yP2MYuBAYKiyshsTFAdj53E9OBaUMK9oXUkwXgtqSXp2WhVPQn59mBI8WaF3s3uPjUyB iqOcCQDoW+1RA5LBnHEIL5z2LGn30WL4wkaMrmWVBG7gXbMMMgtKq8Yo2oXuAHeUtc0cZSO92H20f+eWnjSn+F/8huWC88HiD9af5IfgdzU=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch-security/t4H8MET5KSWsCZV1lnmYa1cXJCA>
Subject: Re: [6tisch-security] meeting times
X-BeenThere: 6tisch-security@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Extended Design Team for 6TiSCH security architecture <6tisch-security.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch-security>, <mailto:6tisch-security-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch-security/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch-security@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-security-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch-security>, <mailto:6tisch-security-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 08:12:52 -0000

Hi Michael,

I just printed a version.
I was confused by the difference between
(1) Voucher request artifacts, and
(2) Voucher artifacts

I assumed that (1) related to the voucher request extensions to EST 
which had been removed from est-coaps.
I certainly like to have a section (will write it) that describes the 
EST extensions removed from est-coaps.

Concerning the proxy text: where else do you want to put that?

Anyone any suggestions?

Peter

Michael Richardson schreef op 2018-01-16 22:15:
> Peter commented on the document:
> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-anima-ace-constrained-voucher/
> 
> He said that the TOC looked okay.
> He wonders if we were going to include the proxy text in this document.
> I don't know.
> 
> Peter asked:
>> Concerning SIDs. I doubt that there is IANA involved, but some info on 
>> the
>> authoritative server is certainly wanted
>> plus a reference to the SID I-D.
> 
> okay, I think we'll be testing the waters here.
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch-security mailing list
> 6tisch-security@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch-security