Re: [6tisch] [6lo] Thomas' review of draft-richardson-6lo-ra-in-ie-00

sajjad akbar <sajjad.akr1@gmail.com> Mon, 28 November 2016 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <sajjad.akr1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780B51295BF; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 05:42:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rtRc1iaFnPyR; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 05:42:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BEAE129578; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 05:42:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id b14so96512152lfg.2; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 05:42:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pUD4ImAAuy0+bNf1am5XbqdjoZ33+VFZiFV/Gq1tA5I=; b=GEQx5C6AUC0c0rP37LO17bR7QfCuOWM+p+HfIWWqHme7IH2/J4RrOGbtrivWPthcIO GJrVEBTVAn2sEw+CYOkKbo1RLgImwxXonJC8V3VLzN4BtRxW5zjgb2ygA29HJEGZr61m 4h5K8HCQNrTZ1Jr1W8fwTrTl36F4616atL2QD2+FKUFUYTcMQ6SEu+3e3NOnncI5+YoE 7WpCUEEjmuWUS++qSgp7prxtPF76u3DfDpklbCE9Ne8JixTzSBp1Eu4fbcGX2u3+6drY S8sVCNJ+bc9jkj3eXZysIwF+mugrxadKnTqxZjJVbtk1K0uaYm37qtBEDDEbIdnbPw2t hQwA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pUD4ImAAuy0+bNf1am5XbqdjoZ33+VFZiFV/Gq1tA5I=; b=XA1t30PVDRa5VFvv3xMafdvDoSHleSBkhvDSHPA+gcDpaX0tPOLJXpHOSw7YEIehbE L9NxW9fW82HvClbImryisZ7BoaNmMhK/Fpvi2vNQMsGSzPOZDIukOnHtOfvLHAW5PtUc iBVnJige/EowWCJNJNFgSmes02TT7IRHDazmXUQPAq1CSDyHFdZGVEjci+D5Mr5QtcWO XMmv51tbirEMvfVZDL5BIEKcdvDvFujOlF3x7TIUZs9mEGsWIVCAaTKoh9AaKypbOu2l s9501Pz40hiKh0sXomOg5ttQ+jlzbqB3D51k34YAZu3MVu/HRHbWIUAA05VAadZ9O8Bz mcrg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02S9zpKdaE06/qe9sQTa+IxMO788EuTzMa8Q9Vhkuc1fEbEixcxdoPdpNdAo7TdFYroaFUUpVli00bpBg==
X-Received: by 10.25.72.215 with SMTP id v206mr8423484lfa.12.1480340566727; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 05:42:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.196.210 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 05:42:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87wpfoyerc.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
References: <CAByBar_hF=RVsgMA7KvqZb_NoEQuNmzBw7thgpe1eqZz28mmrQ@mail.gmail.com> <87wpfoyerc.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
From: sajjad akbar <sajjad.akr1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:42:45 +0000
Message-ID: <CAByBar_8sXLu04g7Q3b5fZLv10dKOWAm-Ocua4LqzhxfkFSstg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="94eb2c1a1f5ea0882505425ca5e5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/0MrbMg9rU5IfIsbQh3pKd9zCkuA>
Cc: 6tisch@ietf.org, lo <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] [6lo] Thomas' review of draft-richardson-6lo-ra-in-ie-00
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:42:51 -0000

Hi

As I am doing my PhD thesis on patient monitoring systems which are based
on lower power radio like IEEE 802.15.4. I will just share a part of this
to elaborate the scenario in context of patient monitoring systems.

In patient monitoring systems where life critical data requires limited
delay, high throughput and energy efficient communication simultaneously. it
is observed that wireless biomedical sensors generate a large number of
small packets in a limited time period which poses challenges for the MAC
layer, especially on channel access process.  Therefore, for mentioned
challenges TSCH proves to be expensive in terms of management and
resources, however simple hybrid channel access mechanism of IEEE is more
suitable. In the following , the traffic patterns analysis mechanism is
developed to understand the requirements of the sensor nodes in patient
monitoring systems.




[image: Inline image 1]




Regards



On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com> wrote:

> sajjad akbar <sajjad.akr1@gmail.com> writes:
> > As per my research experiments if we consider patient monitoring, I
> found TSCH
> > is considered as a new efficient MAC protocol that incorporates
> > time-slotted access with multiple channel and channel hopping. It is
> > popular mainly due to its interoperability with Internet of things (IoTs)
> > with appropriate support to mesh networks.  As TSCH more suitable for
> high
> > coverage scenarios and particularly node-coordinator scenarios like
> patient
> > monitoring systems are ignored, however slotted CSMA/CA proved to be more
> > efficient for patient monitoring. What you guys think?
>
> Can you give us more details about your experiments and their results?
>
> Dale
>