Re: [6tisch] Expiration impending: <draft-richardson-6tisch-join-enhanced-beacon-02.txt>
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 08 January 2018 19:10 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F252312D82D for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 11:10:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hZRSeXAnJf0I for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 11:10:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AAAC12D7F9 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 11:10:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451BD20091 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 14:15:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5883D83159 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 14:10:46 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: 6tisch@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <151541532873.27527.14083765733972543301.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <151541532873.27527.14083765733972543301.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7-RC3; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 14:10:46 -0500
Message-ID: <31240.1515438646@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/DXfQlvVeIhzcSGz-d66Bxg98wrE>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Expiration impending: <draft-richardson-6tisch-join-enhanced-beacon-02.txt>
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 19:10:50 -0000
So, we first talked about this document at IETF98 I think, and it was brought up again at IETF99, and at several virtual interims. There has not been, to my knowledge, much comment on it, or a WG Adoption call. There has been a few emails of support along with some recent discussion about how the documents interact. None have said it was silly or unneeded. I can renew the document, but it would be nice to know if the WG has any plans to consider adopting it. IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> wrote: > The following draft will expire soon: > Name: draft-richardson-6tisch-join-enhanced-beacon > Title: IEEE802.15.4 Informational Element encapsulation of 6tisch Join Information > State: I-D Exists > Expires: 2018-01-19 (in 1 week, 3 days) -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- Re: [6tisch] Expiration impending: <draft-richard… Michael Richardson