Re: [6tisch] downstream traffic adaptation

Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com> Tue, 08 October 2019 11:35 UTC

Return-Path: <tengfei.chang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE661200FE; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 04:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eq9H24Fp-CjI; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 04:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F90712002E; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 04:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id a2so10600254pfo.10; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0/RFZwfzXBy0IcrwlX0G+8TeXza+tbcLYG06V3M37Nk=; b=jkG5l2CUvnvhq5o2JPTPemoqMB+DCKtOzFZVYI3s+r+uDCTdVdcXFpimR5IZF4BSAW 1otidT8E4HyBlTw5Pt2nQLYWHUfSCigAdYVWOLvppr2IB3gGEIm2H+O2t6HSrcgu5vyE Y+MT/PWhd3cCxZ8k5oPDqjqNFtKq3CP/KsToy53ugFV9KRTdR8ZAJTgBAntl4SLPsG9Z bKz57n0AIgicUAJuaIruvrfQ9p5MiK39rbUDQocFRjwbpM1xWTJ1zY8MyoD9VCeGIJ2H Ku6QLnrFyokKVXCNWHWN4SqPFbM7npZiW2bkxoLOSGY3LUBRLMB0KDo2cmqIjjitUtQO spjw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0/RFZwfzXBy0IcrwlX0G+8TeXza+tbcLYG06V3M37Nk=; b=O/KW7MLrOBUsTEB+2CZwmBAWH9WdJxpyDdRwicnvJGU1GmB8b0+A8XuK9T/8l8vE5I 4EPl3NosL+3oSgxcsMj+W+gSNGeAQpsEo3ST4GChY5LtuHiu6RvMiaBlS5N5Cd6hchgi +MR0P//EKlM7OHMBtUbT/vAa5Ef8cpSJpjzwTjaEdukK4M+glDt+ZlqdSX+bMoZCutJD jFC8y3ZB1xckoZi+ztYc6N8opq1ckOm+mA25J2Jw4CCHKF4k/TjsjAfJJwn3CeE9L26I vpnkoMUmcbyMcEIxU47Eu4oxf9VcFgqoL6DlRqwgR5xOKpllX/XvJsBDvZwAZepYbGft NSqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVEp0uElQKxFqtP76AXRxz6EAAq5sAm8xjtoraToIUxe2PIeDEK vPVudyaa4KYrJvUDYRI/v7XAodTFa1sgMBtvjhs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx8rODs0OxqiMZefMhkmBURGUQpaN2x86vnoavaAw9Leur5RH5LV6FZ44L3r6B20vSi/S0gXSIV5zLnVTHacoY=
X-Received: by 2002:a62:1955:: with SMTP id 82mr38347413pfz.256.1570534537883; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAdgstTrkiBHykPqVv6EnGAxKyVHzc4EHFSH4Z0xGF2nOqvJHg@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB35652FA7DEE598BDA8579AFFD8A40@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAAdgstT-Oq-_aYq+Nq+yeyZOkbGuDDkVbFOnFbG_PBiSuKOuqw@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB35651B251F960AC970015C99D89B0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB35651B251F960AC970015C99D89B0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 13:35:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAdgstT_Z2jDmbEn0QGw6epN7misRx1wgYiTjgxkMpxtPTd6tQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-6tisch-msf@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6tisch-msf@ietf.org>, 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003cf6590594649164"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/Iq7MzT9Hoi8pmW6TAxBBxMRndGY>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] downstream traffic adaptation
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 11:35:43 -0000

Yes, I have talked with all the authors and we agreed that the current
version is ready for WGLC!

Tengfei

On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 3:03 PM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Hello Tengfei and all
>
>
>
> I see that the 2 issues of IETF 105
>
>    - Rules for CellList
>    - Downward traffic adaptation
>
> Were discussed and there was no objection. Do you fell ready for WGLC now?
>
>
>
> All the best
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
> *From:* 6tisch <6tisch-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Tengfei Chang
> *Sent:* vendredi 4 octobre 2019 07:25
> *To:* Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>
> *Cc:* 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [6tisch] downstream traffic adaptation
>
>
>
> Hi Pascal,
>
>
>
> Yes, it is implemented and tested, the result is shown in the (long) email
> "[6tisch] validating the downstream traffic adaptation in
> draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-06".
>
> I attached the figure here as well.
>
>
>
> Though that email is long, all the information is the explaination of the
> result figure, trying to make it clear.
>
> You can check the figure directly, I think is understandable for people
> following the msf well.
>
>
>
> Tengfei
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 4:23 PM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
> pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Looks good Tengfei. Did you already implement and test?
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
> *From:* 6tisch <6tisch-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Tengfei Chang
> *Sent:* vendredi 23 août 2019 14:28
> *To:* 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* [6tisch] downstream traffic adaptation
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> As discussed in IETF 105, we are going to support adapting downstream
> traffic.
>
> And now this feature is added in draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-06 published one
> weeks ago.
>
>
>
> Some main changes related to this feature are:
>
>    1. After joined the network and got Rank, the node will only add one
>    Tx Cell to its parent (NOT add Rx Cell)
>    2. When adapting downstream traffic, the mote will check the cell
>    usage on the Rx Cells.
>    3. At each Rx cell to parent, the NUMCELLELAPSE increments
>    4. If there is any frames received on the Rx cell, the NUMCELLUSED
>    increments
>    5. If NUMCELLELAPSE reaches MAX_NUMCELLS, check the percentage of cell
>    usage, if higher than the high threshold, add one Rx cell to parent, if
>    lower than the low threshold, remove one Rx cell to parent.
>    6. The AutoRx cell is used for downstream as well and will never be
>    removed.
>
> Those changes are integrated into version 06 content.. You can read it to
> check exactly how we did the changes.
>
> Please let me know if you have comments on them.. Thanks!
>
>
>
> Tengfei
>
>
>
> --
>
> Chang Tengfei,
>
> Postdoctoral Research Engineer, Inria
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ——————————————————————————————————————
>
>
>
> Dr. Tengfei, Chang
>
> Postdoctoral Research Engineer, Inria
>
>
>
> www.tcahng.org
>
> ——————————————————————————————————————
>


-- 
——————————————————————————————————————

Dr. Tengfei, Chang
Postdoctoral Research Engineer, Inria

www.tcahng.org
——————————————————————————————————————