IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6tisch] moving on with MSF

Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com> Fri, 23 August 2019 12:07 UTC

Return-Path: <tengfei.chang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A0912004F; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 05:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6MKjlzWbJhNv; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 05:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9B1312004E; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 05:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id e11so5690388pga.5; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 05:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uBP8hLV71gbQXY0eVvpqtFwTAUljDXdNslb/t1JsoRM=; b=PCDwE2VPoks9HFs3ES/EzoPxFytgM4eoytiQOtw2ExrviVLbcRnKPGcW5G8AqWwLA5 tVQR656CHgeZSqvxmAFmhIVsgXRXdcfZTF5dhTAccFlONn0sdOEYbt3XW/a89/xJYbOj cJMQjBuZueNjCrgnArnuJaoIUTARaLq25jj51D0vD4MQEujFIoar5JmdG9h103itEZwn dD91vvIvylSVZclIVokv48EnNMHWTMKjC3J49GPyr6VXfNkz8priYiRVU8N2scvE00ZU jgTI4vrP4OI4y0DzBmMINrapVXHDWpnauFDu/bNNXGe/xzleoDUn354esGbTamLABDMh /4TQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uBP8hLV71gbQXY0eVvpqtFwTAUljDXdNslb/t1JsoRM=; b=Nmnet5GelL+utvtpar1nv0tN2ANvh2r2Fz8TnhLu2924mij7aJCYRrEiVOFW7VdZSH bR9vhTernHi+fPoRaEWhq/T88h7LiYv65Fp6lxicRv2UL02wC1HG6zR17iRs5NxwOvpG llH5R3LzPLRkYNlPER8rgfk0zZfuNjEpDnFkg3pHLlf1w00UUgrqBr3UHRXlMHGSrmyl YIBaYjRcOMHYJV8NZyjrae6sEVV/JOp//HNHKBQ5wc2ST2CnxXMJFWFHb+S0/snioSFw dWNq79Gv+HOGCGfZ6FEluOj7IDpYyc2RwYjCkejlJtU39p4W+a2MAj4h9P/MxDng+6/s 5SRw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVVY/3IoysQsQcZyfoG1P2PQT+onjZ/9UCFVGpShwAJNXeaEy55 tpDJHYaMonOYf+tLgYKM7lMnri+9ZsO4Rd8aS7A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzXACODZ5rFbSCIwRictih6E3O4rcqLxKQpz+778i/GJMj8/gp5AEs3Z4OpIrRkOgS+BZ12F7l5oZ2QeTxC1pE=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:5d12:: with SMTP id s18mr4685054pji.112.1566562058233; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 05:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MN2PR11MB35651CB873B89B9076275C56D8A40@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB35651CB873B89B9076275C56D8A40@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:07:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAdgstRTh3H9esX=MbuNUQLmBx2rBYFt85dczpTuzzOeL5MROg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-6tisch-msf@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6tisch-msf@ietf.org>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ffef590590c7a601"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/O-M4eZtKXHBxv_pHIXSnje33QBU>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] moving on with MSF
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 12:07:44 -0000

Hi Pascal,

The two issues mentioned in the IETF 105 meeting are

   - Rules for CellList
   - Downward traffic adaptation

Those two issues are resolved in new version published msf-06.
I will create threads for those issues to clear how they are resolved.
Thanks for reminder!

Tengfei


On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:35 AM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:

> Dear authors
>
>
>
> At IETF 105, we mentioned that 2 issues were remaining and that we’d last
> call by fall. Which is soon.
>
> I’d like to restart the discussion and I’m asking you to start a thread
> for each of these issues so we can solve them and move forward.
>
>
>
> The ball is in you camp.
>
>
>
> Many thanks : )
>
>
>
> Pascal
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch mailing list
> 6tisch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>


-- 
Chang Tengfei,
Postdoctoral Research Engineer, Inria

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email