Re: [6tisch] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-14: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Thu, 05 December 2019 14:58 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C5C12002E; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 06:58:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r-BTYT7nYHFo; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 06:58:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 628A1120013; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 06:58:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 200116b82cc7ef0034996fbfb45dc371.dip.versatel-1u1.de ([2001:16b8:2cc7:ef00:3499:6fbf:b45d:c371]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1icsZt-0008FY-9A; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 15:58:01 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <D16376C9-1302-41CF-938D-3AC0B13030D1@inria.fr>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 15:58:00 +0100
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, 6tisch-chairs@ietf.org, pthubert@cisco.com, draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security@ietf.org, 6tisch@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <189BD0B2-1F1D-4434-A73A-3532F2E53D1F@kuehlewind.net>
References: <157555620387.16491.2371215288094382714.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D16376C9-1302-41CF-938D-3AC0B13030D1@inria.fr>
To: Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1575557885;93e634ff;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1icsZt-0008FY-9A
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/eQioJRcRB3bkJpsn9-J5UOYvtg0>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 14:58:08 -0000
Ah, great, missed that edit. That makes sense! Thanks! > On 5. Dec 2019, at 15:37, Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr> wrote: > > Dear Mirja, > > Thank you for the prompt reaction! The Parameter Update Response message has been removed in the latest version as it was indeed redundant given that the Parameter Update Message is a CoAP CON. Thank you for that remark! > > Regards, > Mališa > >> On 5 Dec 2019, at 15:30, Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: >> >> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-14: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Thanks for addressing my discuss points and also other editorial comments! >> >> Also great that you clarified/introduced COJP_MAX_JOIN_ATTEMPTS; I think that >> also a really good change! >> >> ----------------- >> I only leave this old comment in here because it wasn't further discussed: >> >> I'm putting this one question in the comments section because there is no >> concern that it does not work as specified but I wonder about the design of the >> Parameter Update Response Message. Given the Parameter Update Message is a >> confirmable CoAP message that is transmitted reliable and the content of the >> Parameter Update Response Message is empty, why do you need to send the >> Parameter Update Response Message at all? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 6tisch mailing list >> 6tisch@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > >
- [6tisch] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-… Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
- Re: [6tisch] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Mališa Vučinić
- Re: [6tisch] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Mirja Kuehlewind